Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug: msize opcode does not have the same behavior as ethereum. #99

Open
laizy opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Bug: msize opcode does not have the same behavior as ethereum. #99

laizy opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@laizy
Copy link

laizy commented Feb 18, 2022 •
edited
Loading

The current Memory implementation has a effective_len field (which seems unnecessary #31 ), and it will be updated unexpectedly by mload. so msize called before/after mload may have different value.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@laizy