Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider revisiting "Add async-await to default-features" #2308

Open
taiki-e opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Consider revisiting "Add async-await to default-features" #2308

taiki-e opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
S-needs-decision Status: A decision on whether or not to do this is needed.

Comments

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Jan 8, 2021

Disabling the default features is usually more verbose and easier to forget than enabling a feature.

Given that many libraries seem to disable this feature due to compile times, it may be preferable to disable this feature by default.

Related: #1904

@taiki-e taiki-e added this to the futures-0.4 milestone Jan 8, 2021
@taiki-e
Copy link
Member Author

taiki-e commented Feb 13, 2021

Another idea on this is to remove the async-await feature and add the macro feature that enables proc-macro instead.

@taiki-e taiki-e added the S-needs-decision Status: A decision on whether or not to do this is needed. label Jul 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-needs-decision Status: A decision on whether or not to do this is needed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant