Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Founding Platinum vs. Platinum members #102

Closed
cuviper opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #188
Closed

Founding Platinum vs. Platinum members #102

cuviper opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #188

Comments

@cuviper
Copy link
Contributor

cuviper commented Oct 7, 2021

On the members page, I think it's misleading to list "Founding Platinum" and "Platinum" members separately, as if they have some ongoing distinction in the foundation. Maybe instead we could list them together, but with some sort of "founding" badge?

@tmandry
Copy link
Collaborator

tmandry commented Oct 12, 2021

I like the badge idea!

@abibroom
Copy link
Contributor

I'm thinking I might try a rollover effect like with people's Ferris drawings, to reveal:
founding-member-f46623
founding-member-ffa83d
The darker orange is probably my preference? Not sure. Might change my mind in situ.

@cuviper
Copy link
Contributor Author

cuviper commented Mar 18, 2022

A rollover sounds nice too. That could also be adapted for other members to show something like "Since DATE". (by month?)

@tmandry
Copy link
Collaborator

tmandry commented Mar 18, 2022

Venturing pretty far outside my expertise here, personally I favor a simpler "static" approach which makes the content more accessible. Something like this can work too, but aesthetically I'm not sure I like the idea of replacing non-rectangle logos with orange rectangles on mouseover.

(Only posting this because I interpreted your comment as soliciting feedback, don't let me get in your way :) )

@abibroom
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @tylermandry and of course I wouldn't have left a comment if I wasn't inviting feedback :)

I also don't think this is the best solution for accessibility, but the thing I wasn't sure about with adding a badge to the logos themselves is whether we'd need to run that past members' marketing/comms departments to gain approval - big corporates tend to be a little touchy about that kind of thing and have strict logo usage policies.

I also also might go off the orange background idea entirely, if it looks awful in practice. White/transparent may be better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants