Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose parallelism parameters to users + define reasonable defaults #72

Open
aawsome opened this issue Jul 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
A-commands Area: Related to commands in `rustic` C-enhancement Category: New feature or request P-low Priority: low, not on current prio list perf Performance: Tuning issue

Comments

@aawsome
Copy link
Member

aawsome commented Jul 15, 2022

ATM they are hardcoded at several places and kind of arbitrarily chosen.

See also #61

@aawsome aawsome added C-enhancement Category: New feature or request perf Performance: Tuning issue labels Jul 15, 2022
@aawsome
Copy link
Member Author

aawsome commented Jul 15, 2022

Is also related to #51. Other pack sizes may need other parallelism parameters to work optimal.

@aawsome aawsome added the P-low Priority: low, not on current prio list label Jul 20, 2022
@simonsan simonsan added the A-commands Area: Related to commands in `rustic` label Jul 16, 2023
@simonsan simonsan added this to the Road to v1 milestone Aug 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-commands Area: Related to commands in `rustic` C-enhancement Category: New feature or request P-low Priority: low, not on current prio list perf Performance: Tuning issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants