Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

XPM add new image will fail when having CID active #12

Open
NiclasCedermalm opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

XPM add new image will fail when having CID active #12

NiclasCedermalm opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
bug

Comments

@NiclasCedermalm
Copy link
Contributor

No image is shown when having the CID module active and adding a new image through XPM (not published before to the site). CID is probably not able to handle images published through the preview web service. I have seen this issue on the .NET version as well.
@rpannekoek rpannekoek added the bug label Feb 16, 2016
@rpannekoek rpannekoek added this to the v1.4 milestone Feb 16, 2016
@rpannekoek rpannekoek modified the milestones: v1.5, v1.4 Feb 24, 2016
rpannekoek pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2016
@bkoopman
Merge pull request #12 in TSI/dxa-modules from feature/TSI-112 to dev…
9f09750 
…elop

* commit '2c3a33a1e090522389f8bce91a15002ae3b5cd17':
  TSI-112 adjusted view to show usage of available properties and added support for css classes in the ToHtml method
@rpannekoek rpannekoek modified the milestones: v1.6, v1.5 Jun 21, 2016
@rpannekoek
Copy link
Contributor

TSI-1316 (internal issue ID for tracking purposes)

@rpannekoek
Copy link
Contributor

This indeed seems to be a compatibility issue with CID and XPM Session Preview; there is not much we can do about that in DXA.

@rpannekoek rpannekoek removed this from the v1.6 milestone Sep 21, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@NiclasCedermalm @rpannekoek