Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

This looks interesting... #1

Open
ZKing1000 opened this issue Feb 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

This looks interesting... #1

ZKing1000 opened this issue Feb 21, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@ZKing1000
Copy link

I didn't know you were working on this... Looks pretty interesting... I think I'll give might give it a try... And you implemented different acceleration s for G0 and G1 moves, which is useful. How does the efficiency compare to teacup? What type of step rate can you achieve?,

@ryannining
Copy link
Owner

yes we have that.

mine is not efficient now, because its not using hardware timer, but if you have a 32bit processor, then it will be very fast (ESP8266,STM32).

Step rate, i cannot measure, dont have simulavr yet.

but from rough calculation, each step need at least 50-60us on Nano 328p and less than 10us in STM32

But since its not using timer, then its not trigger timer on exact time.

It use a loop and micros() to check if time to do the stepping.

If you want to try, i will be very happy help

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants