You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been thinking on this for quite some time, and it isn't really a decision being made lightly. But I think with tools, features shouldn't be taken away unless you provide something in return. I don't think this is being done in this case.
I wanted lynt to be a zero config, easy to use tool. However, I think it can remain this way while still allowing some customization on top of it. It should work similar to Webpack v4 – Zero config by default, but the user can still customize if they want to.
This won't make it the same thing as xo though - it will still have the additional benefit of having both TSLint and ESLint support. Also, to further encourage the use of Prettier, style-only rules would not be allowed.
Curious to hear the thoughts of others on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have been thinking on this for quite some time, and it isn't really a decision being made lightly. But I think with tools, features shouldn't be taken away unless you provide something in return. I don't think this is being done in this case.
I wanted
lynt
to be a zero config, easy to use tool. However, I think it can remain this way while still allowing some customization on top of it. It should work similar to Webpack v4 – Zero config by default, but the user can still customize if they want to.This won't make it the same thing as
xo
though - it will still have the additional benefit of having both TSLint and ESLint support. Also, to further encourage the use of Prettier, style-only rules would not be allowed.Curious to hear the thoughts of others on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: