Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(components-styles): rectify broken styles #1058

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 8, 2023
Merged

fix(components-styles): rectify broken styles #1058

merged 9 commits into from
Mar 8, 2023

Conversation

sabertazimi
Copy link
Owner

Pull Request

This PR Contains

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

Rectify broken styles due to antd v5 upgrading.

Test-Case

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

Breaking Changes

Additional Info

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 8, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated
blog ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add your feedback Mar 8, 2023 at 7:41AM (UTC)

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 177 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Medium
Size       : +87 -90
Percentile : 55.4%

Total files changed: 44

Change summary by file extension:
.css : +71 -67
.snap : +0 -0
.tsx : +12 -22
.js : +4 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 8, 2023

Lighthouse Report

https://blog-6mwtkdblc-sabertaz.vercel.app/

🚀 Vercel preview deployment
Lighthouse report

Category Score
🟢 performance 96
🟢 accessibility 100
🟢 best-practices 100
🟢 seo 100
🟢 pwa 100

https://blog-6mwtkdblc-sabertaz.vercel.app/posts

🚀 Vercel preview deployment
Lighthouse report

Category Score
🟢 performance 98
🟢 accessibility 100
🟢 best-practices 100
🟢 seo 100
🟢 pwa 100

https://blog-6mwtkdblc-sabertaz.vercel.app/tags

🚀 Vercel preview deployment
Lighthouse report

Category Score
🟢 performance 99
🟢 accessibility 100
🟢 best-practices 100
🟢 seo 100
🟢 pwa 100

https://blog-6mwtkdblc-sabertaz.vercel.app/books

🚀 Vercel preview deployment
Lighthouse report

Category Score
🟢 performance 99
🟢 accessibility 100
🟢 best-practices 100
🟢 seo 100
🟢 pwa 100

https://blog-6mwtkdblc-sabertaz.vercel.app/about

🚀 Vercel preview deployment
Lighthouse report

Category Score
🟢 performance 100
🟢 accessibility 100
🟢 best-practices 100
🟢 seo 100
🟢 pwa 100

@sabertazimi sabertazimi changed the title Fix/styles fix(components-styles): rectify broken styles Mar 8, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1058 (46fe1c2) into main (6fcbd8d) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1058   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.30%   99.30%           
=======================================
  Files         176      176           
  Lines         865      866    +1     
  Branches       87       87           
=======================================
+ Hits          859      860    +1     
  Misses          5        5           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
components/Button/Button.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
components/Divider/Divider.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
components/Footer/Footer.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
components/Header/DesktopNav.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
components/ImageCard/ImageCard.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
components/MDX/MDXDivider.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
components/Tags/IconTag.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
components/Tags/LinkTag.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@sabertazimi sabertazimi merged commit a7bb3ce into main Mar 8, 2023
@sabertazimi sabertazimi deleted the fix/styles branch March 8, 2023 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant