Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Section 4.1.1 - How Known #18

Closed
jimsch opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Section 4.1.1 - How Known #18

jimsch opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@jimsch
Copy link
Contributor

jimsch commented Jul 9, 2015

Version -02

As part of the missing considerations - are consumers expected to mark with multiple tags or is there going to be some type of - "I deduced this based on other data in the attributes." This does not match either observation (it was not seen in network traffic) or authority (it was not external source of data).

@djhaynes
Copy link
Contributor

djhaynes commented Nov 3, 2016

Examples given in this section were: self, authority, observation, and verification.

The current information model defines a collectionTaskType which includes values like: network-observation, remote-acquisition, self-reported.

We probably need to make a more generic type that captures this information beyond just collection such as the case if the information was retrieved from a repository.

To your point Jim, maybe we need a "derived" value that covers the case where an attribute was deduced based on other data.

Thanks,

Danny

@djhaynes djhaynes modified the milestone: draft-ietf-sacm-information-model-08 Nov 3, 2016
@jimsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

jimsch commented Jan 9, 2017

This has changed a lot since the original comment. I think that adding derived would be fine

@djhaynes
Copy link
Contributor

We should also add "authority" and "verified" to collectionTaskType. It looks like they were not carried over along with the other values (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model-02#section-4.1.1)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants