New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About the train/val splits for SUN RGB-D dataset #49
Comments
Hi @Harvey-Mei , For SUN RGB-D we support 3 benchmarks: sunrgbd, perspective_sunrgbd, total_sunrgbd. As for |
Hi @filaPro |
Hi @filaPro , Specifically, I use the IM3D code, which divides the data set in the same way as total3d. I modified the code of their data processing part to save the image path, and then counted these image paths with the sunrgbd_total3d* used in ImVoxelNet.
Below is the python script I used:
I'm not sure if I'm missing anything or if there's something wrong with the configuration, can you give me some advice? |
Unfortunately I can not reproduce our preprocessing for total sun rgb-d. If this difference really exists it may be a bug on our side. Hope it has not much affect on metrics. |
Yes, I think so. From my statistics, only a very small number of samples are different, so I also think that it has not much affect on metrics. Thanks anyway! |
Hello @filaPro, I modify this line to Although the number of samples is still less than Total3D, the final result is equal to the number of test samples. |
Hello,
Thanks for your excellent work!
I noticed that you have processed the annotation for SUN RGB-D to coco format, could you please tell me your data processing method and the basis of splits.
I have generated the visiualzation for val part, but I cannnot find the samples showed in the paper of Total3D, Is it because you divided the data set differently?
Best,
Harvey
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: