Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement lwc:dom="synthetic-portal" #1530

Closed
ravijayaramappa opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Implement lwc:dom="synthetic-portal" #1530

ravijayaramappa opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@ravijayaramappa
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Allow legacy features that were built before shadow dom semantics existed and hence do not respect those semantics, to be manually injected to a portal of an lwc component.

Describe the solution you'd like
Similar to lw:dom="manual", we can have a lwc:dom="synthetic-portal" feature.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
This is in context of lwc usage on the salesforce platform. The previous generation of lightning components may have to embedded inside an lwc component. In additional, such components can be using third party libraries that were designed without shadow semantics in mind.

@ravijayaramappa ravijayaramappa added this to the 224 milestone Sep 23, 2019
@ekashida
Copy link
Member

Could we be explicit about what this directive would do?

@caridy
Copy link
Contributor

caridy commented Oct 16, 2019

RFC is needed for this... so I suspect we will have a lot more info there. Who is doing the RFC?

@jbleyleSF
Copy link
Member

@ravijayaramappa what is a "a portal of an lwc component"?
Regarding this statement, I thought Aura components weren't allowed to be nested in an LWC:

The previous generation of lightning components may have to embedded inside an lwc component.

@nolanlawson
Copy link
Contributor

Closing for now, please reopen if this is still planned.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants