Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: added functionality for jest custom ruleset #630

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

jaig-0911
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (c5a9571) 96.41% compared to head (8e9734c) 96.32%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #630      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.41%   96.32%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines         418      435      +17     
  Branches       84       88       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          403      419      +16     
- Misses         15       16       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
packages/common/src/helpers.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/common/src/index.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/jest/src/automatic.ts 84.78% <100.00%> (+1.06%) ⬆️
packages/test-utils/src/test-data.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/jest/src/setup.ts 86.95% <50.00%> (-1.14%) ⬇️

@navateja-alagam navateja-alagam merged commit 3e96398 into master Jan 22, 2024
8 of 10 checks passed
@navateja-alagam navateja-alagam deleted the jest-custom-rules branch January 22, 2024 05:22
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 6.3.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants