Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Se om TEI är vägen framåt att hantera strukturerade dokument #84

Open
Tracked by #47
salgo60 opened this issue Nov 2, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #47

Se om TEI är vägen framåt att hantera strukturerade dokument #84

salgo60 opened this issue Nov 2, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
DIGGbacklog Metadatadebt Metadata som borde vara bättre https://twitter.com/hashtag/MetadataDebt?src=hashtag_click

Comments

@salgo60
Copy link
Owner

salgo60 commented Nov 2, 2022 •
edited

Se hur Riksdagstrycket jobbas med, samma borde vara självklart att göra med statens utredningar dokument. Idag kan vi inte ens hitta författningar som refereras från ett dokument om myndigheten är nedlagd...

En tanke liknande med det Ekosystem skapat av Riksdagens Corpus i TEI-Parla-Clarin format och samma som Wikidata jmf welfare-state-analytics/riksdagen-corpus

Se mer info
image
@salgo60 salgo60 mentioned this issue Nov 2, 2022
Open
12 tasks
@salgo60 salgo60 added Metadatadebt Metadata som borde vara bättre https://twitter.com/hashtag/MetadataDebt?src=hashtag_click DIGGbacklog labels Nov 2, 2022
@salgo60 salgo60 mentioned this issue Dec 4, 2022
Open
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
DIGGbacklog Metadatadebt Metadata som borde vara bättre https://twitter.com/hashtag/MetadataDebt?src=hashtag_click
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@salgo60