Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consistent naming scheme in result files #39

Open
3 tasks
sam81 opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks

consistent naming scheme in result files #39

sam81 opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@sam81
Copy link
Owner

sam81 commented Feb 22, 2016

Several points:

  • the name "condition" should be reserved to the experimental condition labels assigned by the user to the experimental conditions. For example result files should peraphs use "trial type" for differentiating between a "same" and a "different" trial in a same-different experiment. Likewise, in experiment with multiple constant stimuli, the "conditions" within a block should be consistently referred to as sub-conditions (this is already done for some paradigms).
  • use of underscore or camel case should be consistent
  • the nDifferences parameter should be renamed nSubconditions (this works for both number of adaptive tracks, and number of constant differences)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant