Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bottom up top down support #14

Closed
plc opened this issue Nov 14, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #21
Closed

bottom up top down support #14

plc opened this issue Nov 14, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #21

Comments

@plc
Copy link

plc commented Nov 14, 2021

Hello!

I am hoping to convince someone to add support for bottom up top down (BUTD) support for this plugin. (a number of users have requested this over the years/months)

I am able to manipulate the BUTD shade by simply adjusting the position, for example this sets the shade to cover the bottom 50% of a window:

{
    "shade": {
        "positions": {
            "posKind1": 1,
            "posKind2": 2,
            "position1": 0,
            "position2": 32000
        }
    }
}

whereas if i invert those numbers, the top 50% of a window is covered:

    "shade": {
        "positions": {
            "posKind1": 1,
            "posKind2": 2,
            "position1": 0,
            "position2": 32000
        }
    }
}

it seems like right now the plugin simply adjusts the position2 variable. if we were able to change the current position slider for simply two text fields with BUTD blinds, allowing the user to input the top and bottom rail position — we'd have support.

I'm curious if anyone would be interested in doing this work? I am very happy to pay and hourly rate and provide QA, obviously.

@kingy444
Copy link
Collaborator

This api has the top down functionality already - its just not built into HA - i will have a commit in the next couple weeks hopefully

i would suggest closing this issue as it is already supported

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants