You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We can currently compare numbers based on greater than or less than, but no way to compare equal to (or gteq/lteq).
The = character is off limits since KSP uses it to parse. ≈ is available but hard to type on Windows (OSX makes it easy with modifiers, not sure about Linux). ~ would also work but is used elsewhere in MM making this possibly confusing. Any other characters make sense?
One option for absolute equality would be to look for a sign at the beginning and if present, use that to check absolute equality (e.g. @PART:HAS[#mass[+0.2]])
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like the sign idea but it may be confusing for users.
We nearly used all the ASCII operator that would be safe to use with KSP so at that point we ll have to use obscure operators that needs ALT codes.
":" may do as an operator. Or ≈ and we explain how to type it (ALT 247). Or ≡ (ALT 240)
We can currently compare numbers based on greater than or less than, but no way to compare equal to (or gteq/lteq).
The
=
character is off limits since KSP uses it to parse.≈
is available but hard to type on Windows (OSX makes it easy with modifiers, not sure about Linux).~
would also work but is used elsewhere in MM making this possibly confusing. Any other characters make sense?One option for absolute equality would be to look for a sign at the beginning and if present, use that to check absolute equality (e.g.
@PART:HAS[#mass[+0.2]]
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: