Skip to content

satoterin/Oxo3d

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

18 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Oxo3d

This is a suite of Go programs for playing and testing 3D noughts and crosses / tic tac toe.

Or try it in your terminal in old school ASCII:

go get -u github.com/ncw/oxo3d
oxo3d
+-------------+-------------+
| .  .  .  .  |  0  1  2  3 |
| .  .  .  .  |  4  5  6  7 |
| .  .  .  .  |  8  9 10 11 |
| .  .  .  .  | 12 13 14 15 |
+-------------+-------------+
| .  .  .  .  | 16 17 18 19 |
| .  .  .  .  | 20 21 22 23 |
| .  .  .  .  | 24 25 26 27 |
| .  .  .  X* | 28 29 30 31 |
+-------------+-------------+
| .  .  .  .  | 32 33 34 35 |
| .  .  .  .  | 36 37 38 39 |
| .  .  .  .  | 40 41 42 43 |
| .  .  .  .  | 44 45 46 47 |
+-------------+-------------+
| .  .  .  .  | 48 49 50 51 |
| .  .  .  .  | 52 53 54 55 |
| .  .  .  .  | 56 57 58 59 |
| .  .  .  .  | 60 61 62 63 |
Go (0..63) 

Playing the game

Oxo 3D is a 3 dimensional (4x4x4) noughts-and-crosses / tic-tac-toe game. This is a game with considerably more strategy than the traditional 3x3 version.

You're O and you have to get 4 in a row. The board is a cube viewed in slices. Imagine the 4 slices piled on top of each other.

Watch out for tricky diagonal lines!

Good luck!

How to play 3D Noughts-and-Crosses

Each group of 4x4 positions represents one plane on the cube.

On each layer there are 10 possible winning lines, 4 horizontal, 4 vertical and two diagonal.

However lines may run from layer to layer also.

There are 76 lines in total possible, these are 4x4 = north-south lines, 16 east-west lines, 16 vertical lines, 2x4x3 = 24 diagonal lines from one edge to another, and 4 diagonal ines from corner to corner.

Levels

There are 6 carefully graduated levels with interesting names.

The levels get increasingly hard. Easy and Simple use the same simple heuristic player, but Easy makes random mistakes. Sneaky uses a two level lookahead player. It is called Sneaky for good reason as you'll see when you play it. Relentless plays very slightly better than Sneaky but with a completely different style. Hard is exactly that and Very Hard plays so well that I haven't beaten it yet.

Level name Internal name Description Rank
Easy Heuristic0 1 level lookahead heuristic player with random errors 1
Simple Heuristic1 1 level lookahead heuristic player 2
Sneaky Heuristic2 2 level lookahead heuristic player 3
Relentless AlphaBeta2 2 level lookahead minimax player 4
Hard AlphaBeta3 3 level lookahead minimax player 5
Very Hard AlphaBeta4 4 level lookahead minimax player 6

If you play 2,500 rounds of each one against the other this is what the scores look like. A Random player is included too as a control. There are some interesting reversals of form in the table

Player 1 Player 2 Wins Draws Losses Player 1 time per go Player 2 time per go
Heuristic0 Random 2500 0 0 182041 ns 3506 ns
Heuristic1 Random 2500 0 0 17193 ns 1502 ns
Heuristic2 Random 2500 0 0 24100 ns 789 ns
AlphaBeta1 Random 2500 0 0 18244 ns 1320 ns
AlphaBeta2 Random 2500 0 0 220337 ns 307 ns
AlphaBeta3 Random 2500 0 0 6296231 ns 318 ns
AlphaBeta4 Random 2500 0 0 88652221 ns 413 ns
Heuristic1 Heuristic0 2470 0 30 10722 ns 145330 ns
Heuristic2 Heuristic0 2274 22 204 17717 ns 120008 ns
AlphaBeta1 Heuristic0 2185 0 315 14914 ns 146380 ns
AlphaBeta2 Heuristic0 2465 1 34 248772 ns 51983 ns
AlphaBeta3 Heuristic0 2470 0 30 6134420 ns 19663 ns
AlphaBeta4 Heuristic0 2489 1 10 133985769 ns 15304 ns
Heuristic2 Heuristic1 1002 642 856 16801 ns 8780 ns
AlphaBeta1 Heuristic1 242 2 2256 15445 ns 10625 ns
AlphaBeta2 Heuristic1 1187 486 827 184999 ns 8261 ns
AlphaBeta3 Heuristic1 1470 124 906 4577929 ns 8403 ns
AlphaBeta4 Heuristic1 1775 216 509 93224450 ns 8681 ns
AlphaBeta1 Heuristic2 864 45 1591 13980 ns 20328 ns
AlphaBeta2 Heuristic2 1326 621 553 156175 ns 16215 ns
AlphaBeta3 Heuristic2 1848 81 571 4485952 ns 19077 ns
AlphaBeta4 Heuristic2 1599 660 241 49535585 ns 16807 ns
AlphaBeta2 AlphaBeta1 2220 1 279 234968 ns 13948 ns
AlphaBeta3 AlphaBeta1 2095 9 396 6054260 ns 13851 ns
AlphaBeta4 AlphaBeta1 2388 0 112 151574104 ns 14706 ns
AlphaBeta3 AlphaBeta2 1266 59 1175 4487537 ns 237976 ns
AlphaBeta4 AlphaBeta2 1319 193 988 86538385 ns 223163 ns
AlphaBeta4 AlphaBeta3 1740 85 675 82880581 ns 4723343 ns

...and here is the league table summary of the above

Player Score CPU Time
Random -17500 72ms
Heuristic0 -11230 11.56s
AlphaBeta1 -4287 1.98s
Heuristic2 2035 4.54s
Heuristic1 4618 2.04s
AlphaBeta3 7506 15m51.07s
AlphaBeta2 7583 45.25s
AlphaBeta4 11275 5h19m56.46s

Interestingly the Heuristic1 player beats the Heuristic2 player overall, however you'll see in the detailed breakdown that the Heuristic2 player beats the Heuristic1 player.

History

  • Converted to Web with Gopherjs (2018)
  • Converted to Go (2013)
  • Converted to Java on Android (2010)
  • Converted to Python (2004)
  • Converted to Perl (2000)
  • Converted to C (1996)
  • Converted to Psion 3a OPL (1994)
  • Converted to BBC Basic (1985)
  • Converted to QL BASIC(1985)
  • Writen in ZX81 BASIC (1983)
  • 35 Years in the Making!

I used to play this game with my father when I was a boy. We always used to play on squared paper while sitting round the kitchen table. When I was old enough (and the home computer had been invented) this inspired me to write a computer player for the game.

The very first version of this game was written in 1983 on a Sinclair ZX81 in BASIC. It used to take 60 seconds to think of a move, and it used to beat the author nearly all of the time. It used the Heuristic1 player. However computing has moved on, and the current version plays at a much higher strength almost instantly. The author has improved too!

About

Oxo3d - 3D noughts and crosses / tic tac toe

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published