Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

please handle connection problems gracefully #206

Closed
aviau opened this issue Jul 25, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

please handle connection problems gracefully #206

aviau opened this issue Jul 25, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@aviau
Copy link
Contributor

aviau commented Jul 25, 2017

From Debian bug #869510

dhtnode defaults to connecting to bootstrap.ring.cx, which has both an
IPv4 and an IPv6 address. However, it apparently insists on trying to
connect to the IPv6 address, even from systems like mine that still
lack v6 connectivity, and the resulting frequent retries lead to a lot
of syslog spam.

Although I agree that my ISP should get with the times ;-), dhtnode
should meanwhile handle connection problems more gracefully.
Specifically, it should fall back on IPv4 if it can't get IPv6 to
work, and if neither works, it should pause for longer between
retries, perhaps with an exponential backoff.

Could you please look into it?

Cheers,

@aberaud aberaud self-assigned this Jul 26, 2017
@petterreinholdtsen
Copy link

Is this hard to implement?

@terrytw
Copy link

terrytw commented Apr 5, 2021

I ran into the same problem. The log file is humongous after a few hours.

@ghenry
Copy link
Collaborator

ghenry commented May 6, 2022

Still a requirement?

Thanks.

@petterreinholdtsen
Copy link

petterreinholdtsen commented May 6, 2022 via email

@ghenry
Copy link
Collaborator

ghenry commented May 6, 2022

I mean to politely ask if you've tried or tested again since 2019 :-)

@petterreinholdtsen
Copy link

petterreinholdtsen commented May 6, 2022 via email

@ghenry ghenry closed this as completed May 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants