Kill this repo

[dwijnand]

and move it's pieces in whatever downstream sbt module requires them.

[jvican]

Another suggestion: use better-files where possible.

[dwijnand]

• In-source the modules of sbt/util required in sbt/lm librarymanagement#118
• In-source the modules of sbt/util required in sbt/zinc zinc#321
• In-source the modules of sbt/util required in sbt/sbt sbt#3290

[dwijnand]

OK, instead of partitioning various bits of sbt/util in the downstream repos I'll do just the changes necessary to move the sbt-only modules back into sbt/sbt (util-collection, util-complete and util-logic).

In sbt 1.x (maybe sbt 1.1) I'll make whatever changes I can get away with, without breaking compatibility in our public API to move more modules back into sbt.

And finally in sbt 2.x I hope to be able to have all sbt's internal modules back into sbt, and anything shared between sbt and zinc be proper self-standing projects (like sjsonnew/contraband/simulacrum/machinist).

In terms of "Kill this repo", this issue can be closed.