Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend golr pattern to include subj/obj equivalents and xrefs #26

Open
cmungall opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Extend golr pattern to include subj/obj equivalents and xrefs #26

cmungall opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor

In addition sub/obj_closure, it would be useful to have

  • sub/obj_equivalents - all members of equivalence clique (reflexive: includes self)
  • sub/obj_xrefs- all xrefs annotations for all members of clique (reflexive: includes self.curie)

These would be useful for query purposes. Currently in biolink we take the input ID and use subject_closure, which includes equivalence, but also allows parents which we don't want.

xrefs are useful for near-equivalence. E.g. when querying for gene-disease, we want to allow input of uniprot protein xref

@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmungall commented Mar 7, 2017

cc @kltm, this would be useful for GO too. Currently we don't really have a good way of keeping the schemas in sync. I think we may want a master yaml, from which to derive individual views

@kltm
Copy link

kltm commented Mar 7, 2017

@cmungall not sure I'm following here. Are you talking about keeping the uber schema in sync (to maximize widget reuse, etc.) or about individual views (e.g. the very specific yaml used to autogenerate settings on a particular page, e.g. http://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/dd_browse and https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/blob/master/metadata/ann-config.browse.yaml)? And if there was an uber schema, how would I keep my dozen or so app-level views in sync?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants