You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue started as an informal conversation between @matthewfeickert and myself on Twitter.
If I am not mistaken, GitHub recently extended the possible values for the type field, when describing workflow parameters. Possible values for this field are: string, choice, environment and boolean (this is the blog post where the list was extended).
Therefore, any choice marked input, whose only options are true and false, can be simplified by stating type: boolean. I personally did this in a couple of projects, and this is how it looks like:
I suggest you simplify the syntax of the following workflows:
This issue started as an informal conversation between @matthewfeickert and myself on Twitter.
If I am not mistaken, GitHub recently extended the possible values for the
type
field, when describing workflow parameters. Possible values for this field are: string, choice, environment and boolean (this is the blog post where the list was extended).Therefore, any choice marked input, whose only options are
true
andfalse
, can be simplified by statingtype: boolean
. I personally did this in a couple of projects, and this is how it looks like:I suggest you simplify the syntax of the following workflows:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: