You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In practice, being able to use monotonic constraints in "black boxes" is very useful and a small step towards interpretability.
While quite common in gradient boosting implementations (e.g. your https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/ensemble.html#monotonic-cst-gbdt, XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM), I am not aware of any random forest implementation offering such option. I would love to see this feature in the scikit-learn random forest.
Describe your proposed solution
Same logic as for gradient boosting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the workflow you want to enable
In practice, being able to use monotonic constraints in "black boxes" is very useful and a small step towards interpretability.
While quite common in gradient boosting implementations (e.g. your https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/ensemble.html#monotonic-cst-gbdt, XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM), I am not aware of any random forest implementation offering such option. I would love to see this feature in the scikit-learn random forest.
Describe your proposed solution
Same logic as for gradient boosting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: