-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
function convert_8term_2_12term only returns 10 terms #122
Comments
so i think 8-term should have been called 10-term, and isolation should have been include-able. we might consider adding isolation terms into the |
None of the EightTerm calibrations use the isolation terms. EightTerm model can be extended to include them, but using them would require some changes in the code. For example switch correction is calculated in a different way if the isolation terms aren't zero. I don't think that including the zero isolation terms in the convert_8term_2_12term as you suggested will break anything. In fact I think it's a bug that they are not initialized to zero because 12-Term calibrations do initialize them to zero if isolation calibration is not done. |
ok, sounds like maybe we should make a new issue for adding isolation to the 8term class of calibrations, and close this one. |
This came up as I was fiddling with an Agilent PNA calibration. Performing a standard TRL calibration resulted in the following error terms being set on the VNA:
in the convert_8term_2_12term function, only terms 1-5 are return.
Also, internally skrf calls term 6 "isolation" instead of "crosstalk".
Can we just add in the following two lines at the end of convert_8term_2_12term:
or would this cause any problems?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: