Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inline code #26

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed

Inline code #26

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

stijnvanhoey and others added 13 commits June 6, 2016 13:58
@stijnvanhoey
add GBIF download predicate building class
0869595
@stijnvanhoey
adapt formatting and pep8 settings of download file
6975b4e
@stijnvanhoey
restructure name and password handling
e47ae7e
@stijnvanhoey
add support for a main predicate combiner
9c7fc58
@stijnvanhoey
add logical symbol usage support for single predicative types as well
322adea
@stijnvanhoey
explain usage of predicate types in docstring iterative predicate
0f914aa
@stijnvanhoey
update download function relying on the GBIFDownload class
17dd2ec
@stijnvanhoey
clean remarks of pep8 violations
09b5efc
@stijnvanhoey
add support to retrieve the download key from the request
a9efae5
@stijnvanhoey
add handling of download key
348f3bc
@peterdesmet
Add occurrences.download to documentation
99a2112
@peterdesmet
Use ... in documentation for inline code and use for every litera…
4dac500 
…l value reference

- Current `…` got translated to <cite> rather than code
- There was no consistent use of `…`, ‘…’ or “…”  for value references
- I occasionally corrected some other syntax issues
@peterdesmet
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/downloads' into downloads
1a950d8 
# Conflicts:
#	pygbif/occurrences/__init__.py
@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member Author

Too early, I meant to include this https://github.com/stijnvanhoey/pygbif 😊

@peterdesmet peterdesmet closed this Jun 7, 2016
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 7, 2016 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-6.5%) to 57.105% when pulling 1a950d8 on stijnvanhoey:inline-code into bfb9ca1 on sckott:master.

@peterdesmet peterdesmet deleted the inline-code branch June 7, 2016 06:26
@sckott
Copy link
Collaborator

sckott commented Jun 7, 2016

@peterdesmet so forgot about this PR?

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, forget about this one. Everything is included in #27

@sckott
Copy link
Collaborator

sckott commented Jun 8, 2016

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@peterdesmet @coveralls @sckott @stijnvanhoey