-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Import missing data (and possibly history?) from old repository #16
Comments
Of course I forgot one important point: |
@oberstet - If you have an opinion on any of the bullet points above (no matter whether positive or negative) just let us now. The most important decision probably would be history since it might influence how we deal with the rest. |
Thanks for the extensive list and useful structuring into separate issues! Awesome. Regarding the concrete list above: this all makes sense, however (given limited resources) I'd probably pick #15 as top prio. This really allows us to demonstrate continuity in scour development as we are adding more features. Compared to this, the rest of the points on the list seems "nice to have" to me .. |
I found a possible solution for the history import, see #23. |
@Ede123 now that the unit tests are migrated, my personal next one on your list would be: bugs. Regarding the others:
I also think the project README deserves some love. Plus: do we want some user docs? More cookbook/recipe like probably .. FWIW, we have a 3 part blog post about SVG, also using scour http://tavendo.com/blog/post/preprocessing-svgs-for-the-web/ |
|
While we're in the process of migrating data from the old repository, it might be a good time to check what else might be worth to keep. Personally I'd say the following should be considered:
The full commit history of the relevant script files could be most useful when trying to figure out the idea behind parts of old code. However there are some issues:
Do we want to transfer the bugs currently on launchpad to GitHub?
We should probably start to create release notes for new releases, too?
It's surely nothing fancy, but we might want to keep it?
There are some more things I'm less sure about (and therefore would probably drop, at least at this point; we can still bring them back in one way or another in the future if needed):
For earlier versions there were some "fancy" statistics being made (see e.g.
statistics.html
andstatistics.xls
as well as the test files in thefulltests
folder). They're surely nice to have and show what Scour actually does, but without somebody to maintain them they're of little use.scra.py
andwebscour.py
)Feel free to comment on the above and add others if I missed something!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: