-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b25_alalal-a34196.xml
160 lines (160 loc) · 7.66 KB
/
cod-al7b25_alalal-a34196.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 8</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 8</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Ba" n="cod-al7b25">Paris 1894, v. 25</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Ba" n="169"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-a34196"><!-- l1d4a8 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-a34196-Hd1e99">Articulus 8</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-a34196-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An de Deo potest formari propositio ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e104">
<cb ed="#Ba" n="c"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="30"/>ARTICULUS VIII.
<lb ed="#Ba" n="31"/>An de Deo potest formari propositio ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="32"/>Incidit autem hic duplex dubium.
<lb ed="#Ba" n="33"/>Unum est, si de Deo possit formari
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="34"/>positio ? Secundum, si aliquo modo
pot<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="35"/>est formari, utrum essentia debet subjici,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="36"/>vel pradicari tantum, vel possit 1ecte in
<lb ed="#Ba" n="37"/>divinis fieri utrumque ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e129">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="38"/>Circa primum objicitur sic:
<lb ed="#Ba" n="39"/>1. Simplicissimum non habet
composi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="40"/>tionem : ergo si ipsum ut compositum
<lb ed="#Ba" n="41"/>significatur, significatur falso: sed
om<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="42"/>nis compositio significat ut compositum :
<pb ed="#Ba" n="170"/>
<cb ed="#Ba" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="1"/>ergo non potest fieri propositio habens
<lb ed="#Ba" n="2"/>compositionem de Deo: et omnis
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="3"/>positio habet compositionem : etgo nulla
<lb ed="#Ba" n="4"/>propositio est vera de Deo si sit
affirma<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="5"/>tiva.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e159">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="6"/>2. Item, Dionysius dicit, quod
affirma<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="7"/>tiones in divinis sunt false, et negative
<lb ed="#Ba" n="8"/>omnes vere ; ergo videtur, quod omnes
<lb ed="#Ba" n="9"/>propositiones affirmative de Deo false
<lb ed="#Ba" n="10"/>sint,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e172">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="11"/>3. Si forte dicatur, quod compositio
<lb ed="#Ba" n="12"/>est in Deo secundum modum significandi
<lb ed="#Ba" n="13"/>propter nostri intellectus infirmitatem.
<lb ed="#Ba" n="14"/>Contra : Intellectus per errorem non
cu<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="15"/>rat suam infirmitatem : sed cum
compo<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="16"/>nit aliquid in divinis, errat: ergo talibus
<lb ed="#Ba" n="17"/>propositionibus sua infirmitas non
cura<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="18"/>tur : ergo non debet uti eis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e192">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="19"/>4. Item, Cassus est intellectus qui
<lb ed="#Ba" n="20"/>nullo modo potest attribui rei: ergo
vi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="21"/>detur, quod talium propositionum sit
in<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="22"/>tellectus cassus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e203">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="23"/>Solutio. Sicut dicit Augustinus : Deus
<lb ed="#Ba" n="24"/>admisit humane vocis obsequium, de
<lb ed="#Ba" n="25"/>quo tamen nihil digne dici potest. Unde
<lb ed="#Ba" n="26"/>sicut de Deo in temporali loquentes,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="27"/>verbis cujuslibet temporis utitur : ita de
<lb ed="#Ba" n="28"/>Deo simplicissimo loquentes, utimur
mo<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="29"/>do compositionis et modo divisionis in
<lb ed="#Ba" n="30"/>locutionibus: sed cum in talibus, nota
<lb ed="#Ba" n="31"/>compositionis quae significatur in verbo,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="32"/>est, significat identitatem secundum rem,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="33"/>et non modum inherentie, sicut
inhe<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="34"/>rentis per se, vel substantialiter, vel per
<lb ed="#Ba" n="35"/>accidens.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e234">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="36"/>Dicendum igitur ad primum, quod licet
<lb ed="#Ba" n="37"/>Deus sit simplicissimus, tamen multis
<lb ed="#Ba" n="38"/>modis significatur, sicut supra, in tertia
<lb ed="#Ba" n="39"/>distinctione, habitum est : et ex illis
pot<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="40"/>est fieri compositio notans rei identita~
<lb ed="#Ba" n="41"/>tem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e250">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="42"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod Dionysius
<lb ed="#Ba" n="43"/>intelligit de affirmativa significatione
in<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="44"/>complexorum, quae per nomen plene non
<lb ed="#Ba" n="45"/>ostendunt quae conveniunt Deo, et non
<lb ed="#Ba" n="46"/>intelligit de affirmatione compositionis
<lb ed="#Ba" n="47"/>que nota est identitatis praedicati cum
<lb ed="#Ba" n="48"/>subjecto.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a34196-d1e269">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="49"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod intellectus aas es
<lb ed="#Ba" n="50"/>salvatur (alias, significatur) in re
quan<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="51"/>tum ad hoc quod multis modis Deus
sig<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="52"/>nificatur. Unde invenit in Deo ea que
<lb ed="#Ba" n="53"/>multa sunt in rationibus nominum, licet
<lb ed="#Ba" n="54"/>unum sint in rebus: et quia ratio
homi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="55"/>num est vera, est enim ipse vere sapiens,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="56"/>et potens, et hujusmodi: et ideo non
<lb ed="#Ba" n="57"/>est cassus, et curatur ab ignorantia, eo
<lb ed="#Ba" n="58"/>quod non refert in Deum illas
composi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="59"/>tiones per modum inherentiae, sed potius
<lb ed="#Ba" n="60"/>per modum identitatis.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>