-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b25_alalal-a71839.xml
149 lines (149 loc) · 7.07 KB
/
cod-al7b25_alalal-a71839.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 7</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 7</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Ba" n="cod-al7b25">Paris 1894, v. 25</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Ba" n="361"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-a71839"><!-- l1d12a7 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-a71839-Hd1e99">Articulus 7</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-a71839-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An quidquid habet Filius, habet a Patre
per generationem ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-a71839-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="26"/>ARTICULUS VII.
<lb ed="#Ba" n="27"/>An quidquid habet Filius, habet a Patre
<lb ed="#Ba" n="28"/>per generationem ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a71839-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="29"/>Deinde quaeritur de hoc quod dicit:
<lb ed="#Ba" n="30"/>
<quote xml:id="alalal-a71839-Qd1e119"> Quidquid habet, de Patre habet Filius,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="31"/>etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a71839-d1e125">
<cb ed="#Ba" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="32"/>1. Sed non habet nisiper generationem:
<lb ed="#Ba" n="33"/>ergo per generationem habet quidquid
<lb ed="#Ba" n="34"/>habet : sed habet processionem Spiritus
<lb ed="#Ba" n="35"/>sancti a se: ergo per generationem
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="36"/>bet illam : ergo processio est per
gene<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="37"/>rationem, quod falsum est, cum dicant
di<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="38"/>versos fluxus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a71839-d1e146">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="39"/>2. Item, Si quidquid habet Filius,
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="40"/>bet a Patre : ergo quidquid habet
Spiri<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="41"/>tus sanctus, habet ab utroque : ergo quod
<lb ed="#Ba" n="42"/>procedit ab utroque, habet ab utroque:
<lb ed="#Ba" n="43"/>ergo quod procedit a Patre, habet ab
<lb ed="#Ba" n="44"/>utroque: ergo quod procedat a Patre,
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="45"/>bet aFilio, quod falsum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a71839-d1e164">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="46"/>Ad uacet hujusmodi sophismata
di<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="47"/>cendum, quod quidquid habet Filius,
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="48"/>bet a Patre per generationem: sed non
<lb ed="#Ba" n="49"/>sequitur, quod totum sit natum quod
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="50"/>bet, sicut supra est determinatum: quia
<lb ed="#Ba" n="51"/>Filius natus est, et generatione est, et alia
<lb ed="#Ba" n="52"/>sunt in ipso per identitatem ad natum :
<lb ed="#Ba" n="53"/>et sic vis processiva est in ipso, sive
spi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="54"/>ratio activa.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a71839-d1e186">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="55"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod quidquid
<lb ed="#Ba" n="56"/>habet Spiritus sanctus, habet ab utroque
<lb ed="#Ba" n="57"/>divisim et conjunctim: quia totum
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="58"/>bet a Filio, et totum habet a Patre: quod
<lb ed="#Ba" n="59"/>autem infertur: ergo quod procedit ab
<lb ed="#Ba" n="60"/>utroque, etc., possumus dicere sicut
com<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="61"/>uniter solvitur, quod est commutatio
<lb ed="#Ba" n="62"/>predicamenti: quia procedere non est
<lb ed="#Ba" n="63"/>quid, sed ad aliquid.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a71839-d1e208">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="64"/>Sed quia posset opponi quod secundum
<lb ed="#Ba" n="65"/>hoc non valeret ratio Augustini
proban<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="66"/>tis quod Filius habet a Patre quod ab
<lb ed="#Ba" n="67"/>ipso procedat Spiritus: quia quidquid
<lb ed="#Ba" n="68"/>habet, habet a Patre. Concedatur hec,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="69"/>quod quidquid habet, habet ab utroque,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="70"/>et concedatur conjunctim tantum : et si
<lb ed="#Ba" n="71"/>postea infertur: ergo habet a Filio quod
<lb ed="#Ba" n="72"/>procedit a Patre, patet quod non
sequi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="73"/>tur: quia ab immobili suppositione
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="74"/>cedit ad mobilem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-a71839-d1e234">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="75"/>Si autem objicitur, quod hoc est
con<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="76"/>trarium hujus quod dictum est, scilicet
<lb ed="#Ba" n="77"/>quidquid habet, habet ab utroque divisim
<lb ed="#Ba" n="78"/>et conjunctim, Dicendum, quod non:
<lb ed="#Ba" n="79"/>quia prima suppositio non est nisi pro
<pb ed="#Ba" n="362"/>
<cb ed="#Ba" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="1"/>substantialibus : cum autem assumitur
<lb ed="#Ba" n="2"/>secunda, in distributione termini claudi-~
<lb ed="#Ba" n="3"/>tur, etiam notionaliter conveniens: et
<lb ed="#Ba" n="4"/>quia notionale est in utroque conjunctim,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="5"/>ideo non est mirum si variatur supposi-
<cb ed="#Ba" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="6"/>tionis modus. Vel potest dici, quod etiam
<lb ed="#Ba" n="7"/>ratio Augustini non tenet de Filio nisi
<lb ed="#Ba" n="8"/>gratia materie: in forma enim peccat
<lb ed="#Ba" n="9"/>mutando quid in ad aliquid.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>