-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b25_alalal-b05202.xml
130 lines (130 loc) · 5.89 KB
/
cod-al7b25_alalal-b05202.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 18</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 18</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Ba" n="cod-al7b25">Paris 1894, v. 25</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Ba" n="542"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-b05202"><!-- l1d19a18 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-b05202-Hd1e99">Articulus 18</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-b05202-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An potest concedi, quod Deus sit triplex ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e104">
<cb ed="#Ba" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="13"/>ARTICULUS XVIII.
<lb ed="#Ba" n="14"/>An potest concedi, quod Deus sit triplex ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="15"/>Deinde quaeritur de hoc quod dicit in
<lb ed="#Ba" n="16"/>ultima parte, in qua repetit ut addat in
<lb ed="#Ba" n="17"/>in illo capitulo T, <quote xml:id="alalal-b05202-Qd1e121"> Praeterea, cum Deus
<lb ed="#Ba" n="18"/>dicatur trinus, non tamen debet dici
tri<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="19"/>plex.</quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e129">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="20"/>1. Contra hoc enim esse videtur quod
<lb ed="#Ba" n="21"/>dicit Isidorus, Deum esse multiplicem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e137">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="22"/>2. Item, Sapient. vir, 22, dicitur
Spi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="23"/>ritus multiples °.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e144">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="24"/>Item, Deus multipliciter significari in
<lb ed="#Ba" n="25"/>attributis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e151">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="26"/>3. Praeterea, Quare non conceditur
<lb ed="#Ba" n="27"/>Deus esse triplex? Triplex enim potest
<lb ed="#Ba" n="28"/>esse, ubi est unitas : unus enim pannus
<lb ed="#Ba" n="29"/>triplex esse potest : ergo illa non videtur
<lb ed="#Ba" n="30"/>esse causa quam tangit in Littera.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e164">
<cb ed="#Ba" n="c"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="31"/>Ad hoc leve est respondere : quia é
r7<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="32"/>plex dicit multiplicationem per excessum
<lb ed="#Ba" n="33"/>partium ter, et hoc in discretis : in
conti<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="34"/>nuis dicit plicationem partis super partem
<lb ed="#Ba" n="35"/>ter: et neutrum horum convenit divinis
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e180">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="36"/>Ap opjecruM primum dicendum, quod
<lb ed="#Ba" n="37"/>improprissime locutus est Isidorus, et
vo<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="38"/>cat multiplicem vel triplicem idem quod
<lb ed="#Ba" n="39"/>trinum,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e191">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="40"/>Ap aLiup dicendum, quod illa
refe<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="41"/>runtur ad Spiritum in effectibus qui
mul<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="42"/>tiplices sunt.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e201">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="43"/>Et si objicias: ergo quoad effectum
<lb ed="#Ba" n="44"/>potest etiam dici triplex. Dicendum quod
<lb ed="#Ba" n="45"/>non: quia sic poneretur limitatio suis
<lb ed="#Ba" n="46"/>effectibus, qui in nullo numero
determi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="47"/>nato poni possunt, propter nimiam
Spi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="48"/>ritus Jargitatem et bonitatem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b05202-d1e217">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="49"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod causa bona
<lb ed="#Ba" n="50"/>est : quia vere unum est, ut dicit Boetius,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="51"/>in quo nullus est numerus, et non est
<lb ed="#Ba" n="52"/>hoc, et hoc: et hoc est, quia vere
sim<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="53"/>plex, et huic hujusmodi trinitas
conve<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="54"/>nire non potest.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>