-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b25_alalal-b19406.xml
161 lines (161 loc) · 7.67 KB
/
cod-al7b25_alalal-b19406.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 5</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 5</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Ba" n="cod-al7b25">Paris 1894, v. 25</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Ba" n="617"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-b19406"><!-- l1d24a5 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-b19406-Hd1e99">Articulus 5</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-b19406-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Utrum unitas sive termini numerales
univoce praedicentur de essentia,
persona, et notione ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="23"/>ARTICULUS V.
<lb ed="#Ba" n="24"/>Utrum unitas sive termini numerales
<lb ed="#Ba" n="25"/>univoce praedicentur de essentia,
per<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="26"/>sona, et notione ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e115">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="27"/>Deinde quaeritur, Utrum univoce
di<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="28"/>cilur unum de essentia et de persona?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e122">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="29"/>Videtur quod sic : quia
<lb ed="#Ba" n="30"/>1. Non aequivoce simpliciter, sed per
<cb ed="#Ba" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="31"/>prius et posterius dicitur de Creatore et
<lb ed="#Ba" n="32"/>creatura : sed inter essentiam et
perso<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="33"/>nam non est prius et posterius : ergo
di<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="34"/>citur in utroque ex @quo : ergo univoce.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e141">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="35"/>2. Item, Aut una est unitas essentia et
<lb ed="#Ba" n="36"/>persone, aut due. Si due : ergo essentia
<lb ed="#Ba" n="37"/>et persona sunt duo, quod falsum est:
<lb ed="#Ba" n="38"/>ergo relinquitur, quod sit una.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e152">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="39"/>SED CONTRA :
<lb ed="#Ba" n="40"/>1. Cum dicitur, Pater est unus,-sensus
<lb ed="#Ba" n="41"/>est, id est, notione distinctus : cum
au<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="42"/>tem dicitur, essentia una, sensus est, id
<lb ed="#Ba" n="43"/>est, in se indivisa, et ab aliis divisa : er-
<pb ed="#Ba" n="618"/>
<cb ed="#Ba" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="1"/>go non una ratione dicitur essentia una,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="2"/>et persona una.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e174">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="3"/>2. Item, Unum est indivisum in se, et
<lb ed="#Ba" n="4"/>divisum ab aliis : ergo si Pater est unus,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="5"/>ipse erit divisus ab aliis, quod falsum
<lb ed="#Ba" n="6"/>est : quia Filius est in Patre, et e
con<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="7"/>verso.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e187">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="8"/>3. Item, Unum et ens converltuntur :
<lb ed="#Ba" n="9"/>ergo eodem Pater est unus quo Pater est
<lb ed="#Ba" n="10"/>pater : ergo paternitate est unus :
essen<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="11"/>tia autem divina non est una paternitate,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="12"/>sed seipsa : ergo non dicitur secundum
<lb ed="#Ba" n="13"/>unam rationem, sed aequivoce, ut
vide<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="14"/>tur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e205">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="15"/>Ad hoc dicendum, quod una ratione, et
<lb ed="#Ba" n="16"/>non zquivoce dicitur: est enim unitas
<lb ed="#Ba" n="17"/>abstrahens ab hoc uno et illo, et illa est
<lb ed="#Ba" n="18"/>unius ralionis in quohbet uno : quia licet
<lb ed="#Ba" n="19"/>sit a diversis formis, tamen abstrahitur
<lb ed="#Ba" n="20"/>ab eis per unum actum secundum
ratio<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="21"/>nem qui est determinare, et finire, et
<lb ed="#Ba" n="22"/>distinguere : et ideo lapis est unus
lapi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="23"/>ditate sua, et ignum est unum non
lapi<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="24"/>ditate : et tamen unum non dicitur aqui-
<cb ed="#Ba" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Ba" n="25"/>voce : quia sicut lapiditas distinguit
la<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="26"/>pidem, ita ligneitas lignum, et ideo
uni<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="27"/>tas ab utroque est unius rationis: et ideo
<lb ed="#Ba" n="28"/>quoad hoc posset dici, quod unitas cum
<lb ed="#Ba" n="29"/>dicitur de essentia, dicit unitatem
essen<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="30"/>tiae . et cum dicitur de persona, dicit
uni<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="31"/>tatem persone : et licet essentia seipsa
<lb ed="#Ba" n="32"/>distinguatur, persona autem proprietate,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="33"/>tamen unitas non erit diverse rationis.
<lb ed="#Ba" n="34"/>Si autem consideretur unitas secundum
<lb ed="#Ba" n="35"/>suppositum, tunc erit omnino unius
ra<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="36"/>tionis, sed dicta per prius et posterius in
<lb ed="#Ba" n="37"/>essentia et persona.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e260">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="38"/>Et secundum hoc dicendum ad
pri<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="39"/>mum, quod licet non sit prius et
poste<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="40"/>rius secundum rem inter essentiam et
<lb ed="#Ba" n="41"/>personam, tamen est ibi prius et
poste<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="42"/>rius secundum rationem intelligendi.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e274">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="43"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod est una
uni<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="44"/>tas re, et non ratione intelligendi, si
uni<lb break="no" ed="#Ba" n="45"/>tas accipitur in esse ejus quod est unum,
<lb ed="#Ba" n="46"/>et non abstracta ab ipso : et ideo aliquid
<lb ed="#Ba" n="47"/>convenit uni quod non convenit alti.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-b19406-d1e287">
<lb ed="#Ba" n="48"/>Ap alia patet solutio per ante dicta. ad object
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>