-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c11843.xml
217 lines (217 loc) · 10.7 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c11843.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 6</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 6</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="62"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c11843"><!-- l1d28a6 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c11843-Hd1e99">Articulus 6</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c11843-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Utrum innascibilitas potest praedicari de
paternitate ? et, Utrum paternitas est
innascibilis? et, An essentia est
innascibilis ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="73"/>ARTICULUS VI.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="74"/>Utrum innascibilitas potest praedicari de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="75"/>paternitate ? et, Utrum paternitas est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="76"/>innascibilis? et, An essentia est
inna<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="77"/>scibilis ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e117">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="78"/>Deinde queritur de hoc quod dicit,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="79"/>ibi, A, sub finem : <quote xml:id="alalal-c11843-Qd1e123"> Steut filius ad
pa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="80"/>trem, et non filius ad non patrem
refer<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="81"/>tur: ita genitus ad genitorem, et non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="82"/>genitus ad non genitorem referatur
ne<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="83"/>cesse est. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e135">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="84"/>1. Videtur enim, quod licet paternitas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="85"/>non sit eadem notio, quae est
innascibi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="86"/>litas, ut dicit Augustinus hic, eo quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="87"/>paternitate refertur Pater ad Filium, in-
<pb ed="#Bb" n="63"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>genito autem ad non patrem: tamen
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>videtur, quod una praedicetur de alia,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>ut dicatur, paternitas est innascibilitas.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="4"/>Quecumque enim uniuntur in eodem in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>divinis, de se habere non possunt
oppo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="6"/>sitionem : paternitas et innascibilitas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>uniuntur in una hypostasi: ergo non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="8"/>habent oppositionem : ergo unum
pot<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="9"/>est praedicari de altero, ut dicatur,
pa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="10"/>ternitas est innascibilitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e173">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="11"/>2. Item, Licet attributa divine
natu<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="12"/>re differant secundum rationem
intelli<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="13"/>gendi, cum dicitur bonitas, et divina
sa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="14"/>pientia : tamen propter simplicitatem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>ejus in quo sunt, unum praedicatur de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="16"/>alio : et dicimus, divina sapientia est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="17"/>divina bonitas : ergo a simili cum
pa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="18"/>ternitas et innascibilitas uniantur in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="19"/>Patre, non ut diverse res, sed secundum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="20"/>modum intelligendi, videtur quod
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="21"/>pter persone simplicitatem unum
pre<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="22"/>dicetur de alio : et possumus dicere,
pa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="23"/>ternitas-est innascibilitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e204">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>3. Item, Bene sequitur, Pater non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>est Filius: ergo paternitas non est
filia<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="26"/>tio : ergo a simili per oppositum,
inna<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="27"/>scibilis est Pater : ergo. innascibilitas est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>paternitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e217">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>Irem queritur ulterius, Utrum posset
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>dici, Paternitas est innascibilis ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e224">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>Videtur quod sic: quia paternitas est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>Pater : et Pater est innascibilis: ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>paternitas est innascibilis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e233">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>Item, Pater est non nascibilis ;: et non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="35"/>nascibilis est idem quod innascibilis, ut
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>patet haberi ex Littera : ergo paternitas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>est innascibilis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e244">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>Irem queritur, Utruin posset dici
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>essentia innascibilis ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e252">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>Videtur quod sic: quia essentia est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="41"/>non nata, nec abalio : ergo est
innasci<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="42"/>bilis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e261">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>Solutio. Dicendum, quod una
ista<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="44"/>rum notionum praedicatur de alia : et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>non potest dici, Paternitas est
innasci<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="46"/>bilitas : sicut non potest dici, ratio co-
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>enoscendi Patrem in quantum non est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>de principio, est ratio cognoscendi in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="49"/>quantum est principium Filii : et sicut
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>non potest dici, relatio qua refertur
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>Pater in quantum Pater non est de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>principio, est relatio qua Pater refertur
<lb ed="#Bb" n="53"/>ad Filium : notio enim accipit esse
no<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="54"/>tionis a ratione innotescendi, et relatio
<lb ed="#Bb" n="55"/>accipit esse relationis a ratione
refe<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="56"/>rendi.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e296">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="57"/>DicenpuM ergo ad primum, quod
pa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="58"/>ternitas et innascibilitas non habent
op<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="59"/>positionem aliquam secundum aliquod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="60"/>genus oppositionis, sed disparationem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="61"/>habent, secundum quod accipiuntur ut
<lb ed="#Bb" n="62"/>notiones et relationes, non secundum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="63"/>quod accipiuntur utres quae est res Pater,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="64"/>vel persona Patris, vel essentia divina :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="65"/>hoc enim quod uniuntur in persona una,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="66"/>non confert eis rationem notionis unam,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="67"/>nec ratio relationis unam : sicut in
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="68"/>ferioribus ex hoc quod albedo et musica
<lb ed="#Bb" n="69"/>uniuntur in Socrate, non confertur eis
<lb ed="#Bb" n="70"/>esse qualitatem unam, sed quale unum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e329">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="71"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod aliud est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="72"/>de attributis : quia illa non retinent
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="73"/>prium modum praedicandi, sed accipiunt
<lb ed="#Bb" n="74"/>predicationem substantie: relationes
<lb ed="#Bb" n="75"/>autem retinent proprium modum
pra<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="76"/>dicandi, et ideo per illos proprios modos
<lb ed="#Bb" n="77"/>referendi et preedicandi differunt ab
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="78"/>vicem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e349">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="79"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod bene
sequi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="80"/>tur : sed duplex est causa : non enim
tan<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="81"/>tum hujus causa est distinctio
supposito<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="82"/>rum, sed etiam diversitas relationum : et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="83"/>altera illarum causarum salvatur in
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="84"/>prietatibus quae sunt in eadem persona :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="85"/>non enim sequitur, si concretum de
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="86"/>creto praedicatur gratia subjecti, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="87"/>abstractum praedicetur de abstracto:
<lb ed="#Bb" n="88"/>unde non sequitur, album est musicum :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="89"/>ergo albedo est musica.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c11843-d1e375">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="90"/>Av soc quod ulterius queritur, Utrum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="91"/>paternitas sit innascibilis, et essentia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="92"/>innascibilis ? Dicendum quod utraque
<lb ed="#Bb" n="93"/>duplex est, ex eo quod ly innascibilis
<lb ed="#Bb" n="94"/>potest teneri adjective, et sie non est
<pb ed="#Bb" n="64"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>concedendum, quia sic inherenter
pre<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="2"/>dicaretur innascibilis de utroque : vel
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>potest teneri substantive, hoc est, in-
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="4"/>nascibilis est Pater: et sic utraque est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>concedenda.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>