-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c13464.xml
119 lines (119 loc) · 5.44 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c13464.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 11</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 11</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="72"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c13464"><!-- l1d28a11 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c13464-Hd1e99">Articulus 11</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c13464-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Utrum sicut dicitur, Verbum est idem
quod nata sapientia : ita dicit possit,
quod Spiritus sanctus est procedens
bonitas ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c13464-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>ARTICULUS XI.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="26"/>Utrum sicut dicitur, Verbum est idem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>quod nata sapientia : ita dicit possit,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>quod Spiritus sanctus est procedens
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>bonitas ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c13464-d1e117">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>Deinde queritur de hoc quod dicit,
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>ibidem, F, <quote xml:id="alalal-c13464-Qd1e125"> Filius verbum est idem quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>nata sapientia, etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c13464-d1e131">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>4. Eadem enim ratione videtur posse
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>dici, quod Spiritus sanctus est procedens
<lb ed="#Bb" n="35"/>bonitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c13464-d1e141">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>2. Item, Si ly rata dicit notionem, ut
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>dicit Augustinus, et sapientia essentiam,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>sicut Pater est essentia quam habet
Fi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="39"/>lius natus, ita videtur Pater esse sapiens
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>sapientia nata vel genita, cum sapientia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="41"/>essentiam notat, ut dicit Augustinus: et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>hoc falsum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c13464-d1e159">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>Soxutio. De hoc infra tractatus
habe<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="44"/>tur in Littera : et ideo hic breviter
po<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="45"/>test dici ad primum, quod non est eadem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="46"/>ratio de bonitate et de sapientia : quia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>bonitas non dicit nisi objectum charitatis,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>sed sapientia dicit aliquo modo
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="49"/>dum rationem nominis id quod est
Ver<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="50"/>bum, ut est dicens Patrem, et omnia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>creata : et ideo sapientia magis potest
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>recipere notionem Verbi, quam bonitas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="53"/>Spiritus sancti.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c13464-d1e185">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="54"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod licet
sapien<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="55"/>tia sit essentialis, tamen nata sapientia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="56"/>simul, est tractum ad notionale : sicut
<lb ed="#Bb" n="57"/>etiam Magister exponit in Litera, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="58"/>idem est nata sapientia et natus sapiens :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="59"/>et ideo Pater non potest dici sapiens
sa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="60"/>pientia genita : nec hoc sequitur: est
sa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="61"/>piens sapientia quae est Filius : ergo
sa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="62"/>piens est sapientia genita : quia mutatur
<lb ed="#Bb" n="63"/>quid in ad aliquid.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>