-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c15409.xml
166 lines (166 loc) · 7.93 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c15409.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 6</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 6</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="82"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c15409"><!-- l1d29a6 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c15409-Hd1e99">Articulus 6</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c15409-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An Pater et Filius sint idem principium
Spiritus sancti ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e104">
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>ARTICULUS VI.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="26"/>An Pater et Filius sint idem principium
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>Spiritus sancti ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e115">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>Deinde queritur de hoc quod dicit in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>tertia parte, ibi in medio cap. C, <quote xml:id="alalal-c15409-Qd1e121">
Relati<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="30"/>vead Spiritum sanctum unum
princi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="31"/>plum sunt. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e129">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>Queritur enim hic juxta hoc, Utrum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>Pater et Filius sint idem principium
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>Spiritus sancti ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e139">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="35"/>Videtur autem, quod sic: quia
<cb ed="#Bb" n="c"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>1. Unum in substantialibus facit idem :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>cum ergo principium Patri et Filio non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>conveniat accidentaliter, ut supra se@-
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>pe probatur , videtur quod cum Pater
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>et Filius sint unum principium, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="41"/>sint idem principium Spiritus sancti.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e159">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>2. Item, Unitas non multiplicata facit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>idem: sed hic non multiplicatur unitas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>principii in Patre et Filio: ergo facit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>idem : ergo sunt idem principium
Spi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="46"/>ritus sancti.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e172">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>3. Item, Idem et diversum divi-~
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>dunt ens: aut igitur sunt idem
prin<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="49"/>cipium, aut diversum: constat autem,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>quod non diversum : ergo idem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e183">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="83"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>SED CONTRA:
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>Illa identitas aut erit substantialis, aut
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>notionalis, aut personalis. Constat, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="4"/>non notionalis : quia si faceret
identita<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="5"/>tem in personis distinctis, tunc etiam
<lb ed="#Bb" n="6"/>diversitas notionalis faceret diversitatem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>in eadem persona, et sic Pater esset
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="8"/>versus a Patre tribus modis, et Filius
<lb ed="#Bb" n="9"/>esset diversus a se propter duas
notio<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="10"/>nes quas habet : quorum utrumque
fal<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="11"/>sum est. Si autem notat identitatem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="12"/>personalem : tunc principium poneret
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>personas : et non possemus dicere, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="14"/>Pater et Filius essent unum principium,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>quod negatur in Liffera : quia secundum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="16"/>hoc Pater et Filius essent eadem
perso<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="17"/>na. Si autem notat identitatem essentia,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>tunc etiam Spiritui sancto conveniret.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e229">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="19"/>Solutio. Dicendum, quod non
conce<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="20"/>ditur a Magistris, quod Pater et Filius
<lb ed="#Bb" n="21"/>sint idem principium Spiritus sancti: quia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="22"/>hoe nomen zdem propter articulum
inclu<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="23"/>sum, discretivum est suppositi, et notaret
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>identitatem suppositi in Patre et Filio.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e245">
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>AD PRIMUM ergo dicendum, quod in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="26"/>substantialibus in quibus per omnia est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>unitas in supposito, et essentia, et
no<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="28"/>tione, unitas illa causat idem, sed non in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>illis in quibus non per omnia est unitas.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e262">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>Ad aliud dicendum eodem modo,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>quod licet illa unitas non multiplicetur
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>ratione notionis, tamen supponit plura
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>in suppositis : et ideo non potest
causa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="34"/>re idem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15409-d1e275">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="35"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod idem et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>diversum ens sequuntur, et dividunt ubi
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>gratia ejusdem attribuuntur : sed hic
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>non est ita : idem enim respicit
supposi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="39"/>tum, et ideo non convenit : et in hoc
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>sensu bene esset diversum : sed
diver<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="41"/>sum respicit essentiam proprie: et ideo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>iterum non convenit, ut habitum est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>supra ‘. Sed in inferioribus in quibus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>unitatem suppositi sequitur unitas
essen<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="45"/>tia, et e converso, et diversitatem
essen<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="46"/>tiae diversitas suppositorum, et e
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="47"/>verso, in respectu ejusdem possunt
attri<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="48"/>bui : et ideo ibi dividunt ens.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>