-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c15889.xml
171 lines (171 loc) · 8.32 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c15889.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 9</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 9</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="85"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c15889"><!-- l1d29a9 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c15889-Hd1e99">Articulus 9</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c15889-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Quare a quinario notionum Deus non
dicitur quinus ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>ARTICULUS IX.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="8"/>Quare a quinario notionum Deus non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="9"/>dicitur quinus ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="10"/>Secundo queritur, Quare a quinario
<lb ed="#Bb" n="11"/>notionum Deus non dicatur guinus ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e120">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="12"/>Videtur, quod sic esse debeat : quia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>1. Sicut se habet
numerus_persona<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="14"/>rum ad essentiam, ita numerus
notio<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="15"/>num ad personam : sed unitas essentia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="16"/>non excludit quin dicatur Deus trinus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="17"/>propter tres personas : ergo unitas
per<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="18"/>sone Patris non excludit quin persona
<lb ed="#Bb" n="19"/>Patris dicatur trina, et persona Filii
bi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="20"/>na, et Deus quinus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e143">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="21"/>2. Item, Quinque notiones sunt : ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="22"/>quinarius notionum est: et est etiam
<lb ed="#Bb" n="23"/>unitas essentiae. Cum igitur unitas
essen<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="24"/>tiw et ternarius personarum sufficiant
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>ad rationem trini, unitas eadem cum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="26"/>quinario notionum sufficiet ad
ratio<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="27"/>nem quini.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e161">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>3. Item, Bene sequitur, quinarius
lapi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="29"/>dum est: ergo quinque lapides sunt.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>Ergo similiter sequi videtur, quinarius
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>notionum in divinis est : ergo quinque
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>noti sunt : sed quinque noti sunt
quin<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="33"/>que persone: ergo quinque persone
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>sunt in divinis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e179">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="35"/>4. Item, Nihil est numerabile in
divi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="36"/>nis, nisi quod consistit in pluralitate :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>sed id quod est absolutum, non
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="38"/>sistit in pluralitate : ergo solum
numera<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="39"/>tur quod est ad alterum : hoc autem sola
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>notio est : ergo sole notiones
numeran<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="41"/>tur : ergo videtur, quod magis dici
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>debeat quinus, quam trinus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e199">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>Solutio. Dicendum, quod in nulla
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>natura numerum simpliciter qui est
sup<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="45"/>positorum, facit proprietas ut proprietas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="46"/>est, nisi effective constituendo personas :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>et hoc non facit nisi proprietas
persona<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="48"/>lis: et ideo tres proprietates in divinis
<lb ed="#Bb" n="49"/>tantum faciunt numerum : et tres
hy<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="50"/>postases sunt numeratae eo modo quo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>numerus potest esse in divinis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e221">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>Ad PRIMUM autem respondent quidam,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="53"/>quod innascibilitas et principium sunt
<lb ed="#Bb" n="54"/>quasi paternitatis partes, et sunt unum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="55"/>in Patre. Et hoc absurdum est, quod una
<lb ed="#Bb" n="56"/>notio sit alterius pars, cum mnumerus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="57"/>earum accipiatur a modis innotescendi,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="58"/>vel referendi, ut supra est habitum.
Li<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="59"/>cet autem omnes quinque notiones in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="60"/>essentia unum sint quod est essentia,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="61"/>non tamen sunt una notio: unde hoc
<lb ed="#Bb" n="62"/>nihil est. Sed dicendum, quod distincte
<lb ed="#Bb" n="63"/>sunt notiones : tamen non ab eis dicitur
<lb ed="#Bb" n="64"/>persona trina, vel bina: quia notio
<lb ed="#Bb" n="65"/>non facit numerum nisi sit personalis,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="66"/>et non numeratur, sed potius hypostasis :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="67"/>et ideo numerus notionis minus habet de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="68"/>ratione numeri, quam personarum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e260">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="69"/>Av aLiup dicendum, quod quinque
no<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="70"/>tiones non faciunt quinque personas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="71"/>quas competit numerari sub essentia :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="72"/>quia notio non dicit existens per se
perfe<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="73"/>ctum, et in se distinctum, sicut persona,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="74"/>sed potius dicit existens in alio
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="75"/>dum modum, quo illud in quo est,
inno<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="76"/>nescit : et tales multi modi possunt
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="77"/>venire uni supposito.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e283">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="78"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod non
sequi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="79"/>tur : sicut non sequitur, quinarius
mo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="80"/>dorum innotescendi lapides est : ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="81"/>quinque lapides sunt. Nec sequitur,
quin<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="82"/>que sunt modi quibus iste innotescit vel
<lb ed="#Bb" n="83"/>refertur : ergo quinque noti sunt: quia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="84"/>multis modis potest unum et idem
co<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="85"/>gnosci et referri.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c15889-d1e303">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="86"/>Ad uLTimum dicendum, quod procedit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="87"/>ex falsis : quia hypostasis quae non est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="88"/>absolutum, enumeratur in divinis : et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="89"/>huic numerus attribuitur proprie, et non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="90"/>proprietati, vel notioni,
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>