-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c38361.xml
236 lines (236 loc) · 11.6 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c38361.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 1</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 1</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="205"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c38361"><!-- l1d36a1 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c38361-Hd1e99">Articulus 1</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c38361-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An omnia esse in Deo, conveniat
potentiae vel sapientiae vel voluntati, vel
omnibus his ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="21"/>ARTICULUS I.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="22"/>An omnia esse in Deo, conveniat
poten<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="23"/>tiae vel sapientiae vel voluntati, vel
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>omnibus his ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e115">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>Ad intellectum autem solutionis
Magi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="26"/>stri quam ponit in primo capitulo quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>continet primam partem, oportet
inqui<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="28"/>rere duo, scilicet utrum-—omnia esse in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>Deo conveniat potentiae, vel sapientiae,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>vel voluntati, vel omnibus his ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e131">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>Secundo, In quo differant hac tria,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>esse in Dei scientia, et esse in Deo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>cognoscente, et esse in Deo ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e141">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>Ad pRIMuM proceditur sic :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="35"/>1. Nihil est in Deo secundum naturam
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>propriam nisi ipse Deus. Aut ergo
re<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="37"/>linquitur, quod nihil sit in Deo
abso<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="38"/>lute, aut quod secundum potentiam
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="39"/>sit: non autem secundum potentiam
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>materi#, quia ipse non est materia
ali<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="41"/>cujus : ergo secundum potentiam cause
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>efficientis inerit ei omne quod inesse
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>dicitur : ergo non secundum sapientiam,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>et voluntatem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e170">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>2. Item, Est accipere causam actu
<lb ed="#Bb" n="46"/>agentem, et illi respondet effectus in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>actu : et est accipere causam potentem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>agere, et illi respondet posse fieri
cau<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="49"/>satum. Cum igitur ab aeterno res fuerint
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>in Deo, non secundum actuale esse,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>sed secundum hoc quod poterant fieri,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>fuerunt in Deo : sed illi respondet
po<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="53"/>tentia cause : ergo quoad potentiam res
<lb ed="#Bb" n="54"/>in Deo sunt, ut videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e194">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="55"/>SED coNTRA videtur, quod quoad
sa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="56"/>pientiam : quia
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e201">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="57"/>1. Res in Deo sunt per ideam et
ra<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="58"/>tiones : idee autem et rationes ad
sa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="59"/>pientiam et intellectum ordinantur :
er<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="60"/>go res sunt in Deo secundum
sapien<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="61"/>tiam.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e214">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="62"/>2. Item, Augustinus supra ‘ dixit, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="63"/>Filius est verbum Patris, et ars plena
<lb ed="#Bb" n="64"/>rationum omnium viventium. Cum
igi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="65"/>tur rationes vive et quae vita sunt et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="66"/>lux, ordinem habeant ad intellectum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="67"/>et ad sapientiam, videtur quod res sint
<lb ed="#Bb" n="68"/>in Deo quoad sapientiam.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e232">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="69"/>3. Item, hoc videtur ex intentione
<lb ed="#Bb" n="70"/>Magistri : quia hic in tractatu de scientia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="71"/>divina, ipse determinat qualiter res sunt
<lb ed="#Bb" n="72"/>in Deo : ergo videtur, quod gratia
scien<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="73"/>tiae sintin Deo.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e246">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="74"/>Sed videtur iterum, quod ratione
<lb ed="#Bb" n="75"/>voluntatis :
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e253">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="76"/>1. Dicit enim Damascenus, quod
crea<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="77"/>tio est opus voluntatis: cum igitur
<lb ed="#Bb" n="78"/>illius sit producere creaturam, in quo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="79"/>ipsa est creatura, videtur quod
creatu<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="80"/>ra sit in voluntate.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e266">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="206"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>2. Item, In omni motu voluntario
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>et opere principium est voluntas : cum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>igitur res sintin Deo sicut in suo
prin<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="4"/>cipio, videtur quod magis sint in Deo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>ratione voluntatis, quam sapientiae, vel
<lb ed="#Bb" n="6"/>potentiae.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e286">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>Solutio. Dicendum,. quod cum res
<lb ed="#Bb" n="8"/>sint in Deo vita, et lux, et hoc
ratio<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="9"/>ne intellectus practici, necessario
sup<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="10"/>ponuntur tria, scilicet scientia
operabi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="11"/>lium, et potentia ordinata ad opus, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="12"/>voluntas operis. Et ideo dicendum, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>proprie loquendo res sunt in Deo
scien<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="14"/>te, potente, et volente productionem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>earum : formalem tamen respectum non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="16"/>ponunt nisiad scientiam : et ideo Ma~
<lb ed="#Bb" n="17"/>gister innuit, quod sunt in Deo quoad
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>scientiam. Sunt enim tria in re
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="19"/>dum quod exit ab artifice, scilicet
ope<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="20"/>ratio sive. productio rei, et esse, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="21"/>ratio rei operate vel operande. Et cum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="22"/>res quoad operationem referatur in
ar<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="23"/>tificem, refertur tunc proximus
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="24"/>dum rationem ad potentiam, et quoad
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>esse rei proxime refertur ad
volunta<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="26"/>tem quae contentiva est esse et dativa,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>quia ut dicit Dionysius in libro de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>Divinis nominibus : Bonum est
diffusi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="29"/>vum sui et esse . Si autem
conside<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="30"/>ratur quoad rationem, tunc ipsum est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>exemplatum ab arte artificis, et relatio
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>ejus erit ad sapientiam. Magister ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>videns, quod operatio rei et esse nec
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>sunt in Deo, nec ab aeterno, sed.
ra<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="35"/>tio tantum : dicit in Deo esse res quoad
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>sapientiam, quae respondet rationi rei.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>Si tamen totum consideretur quod
exi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="38"/>gitur ad rei productionem, et esse, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>rationem, tunc res sunt in Deo
cogno<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="40"/>scente, et potente, et volente: et sic
pla<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="41"/>num est respondere objectis salvando
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>intentionem Magistri.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e367">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod cum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>dicimus Deum non actu agere, sed
po<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="45"/>tentia ab a&terno, non intelligitur de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="46"/>potentia quae dividitur contra scientiam
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>et voluntatem, sed de potentia in
com<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="48"/>muni : et ideo illa objectio soluta est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e385">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="49"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod potentia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>respondet ei -quod -potest esse quantum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>ad fieri rei : sed non quoad rationem
se<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="52"/>cundum quam creatura fuit ab aeterno
<lb ed="#Bb" n="53"/>in Creatore.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e399">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="54"/>Ad EA quae objiciuntur de sapientia,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="55"/>concedendum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e406">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="56"/>Ad id quod objicitur de voluntate,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="57"/>dicendum quod voluntas secundum
ra<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="58"/>tionem intelligendi, primus motor est:
<lb ed="#Bb" n="59"/>non tamen in ipsa voluntate est ratio
<lb ed="#Bb" n="60"/>operis secundum quam creatura dicitur
<lb ed="#Bb" n="61"/>esse in Deo. Unde Damascenus intendit,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="62"/>quod creatio sit opus voluntatis, ad
<lb ed="#Bb" n="63"/>quam movet voluntas, et non natura
<lb ed="#Bb" n="64"/>sicut ad generationem Filii.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c38361-d1e428">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="65"/>Ad aliud dicendum eodem modo,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="66"/>quod creatura potest referri ad
volun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="67"/>tatem sicut ad principium motivum ad
<lb ed="#Bb" n="68"/>hoe ut educatur et sit: sed non sicut
<lb ed="#Bb" n="69"/>ad id in quo sit proprie ratio
exem<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="70"/>plaris creature.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>