-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c42123.xml
144 lines (144 loc) · 6.95 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c42123.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 11</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 11</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="223"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c42123"><!-- l1d36a11 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c42123-Hd1e99">Articulus 11</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c42123-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An res sunt in Deo ratione persone, et
non essentiae, vel notionis ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="14"/>ARTICULUS XI.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>An res sunt in Deo ratione persone, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="16"/>non essentiae, vel notionis ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="17"/>Deinde queritur de hoc quod dicit :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>
<quote xml:id="alalal-c42123-Qd1e119"> Praeterea sciendum est, quod licet ibi
<lb ed="#Bb" n="19"/>indicetur distinctio personarum, etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e125">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="20"/>Ex hoc enim videtur accipi, quod res
<lb ed="#Bb" n="21"/>sunt in Deo ratione persone, et non
ra<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="22"/>tione essentiae, vel notionis. Hoc etiam
<lb ed="#Bb" n="23"/>alia ratione probatur : quia illud est in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>Deo, cujus ipse est auctor : auctoritas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>autem et opus non convenit nisi
perso<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="26"/>ne, quia omnes actus particularium sunt,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>et non nature.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e146">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>SED CONTRA :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>1. Ponamus personas non esse, adhuc
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>Deus erit auctor creature : ergo cum
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>cognoscat omnia quae operatur, in ipso
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>erunt omnes rationes operum suorum :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>ergo hoc convenit ratione nature, et non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>ratione persone.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e166">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="35"/>2. Ulterius videtur, quod hoc
conve<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="36"/>niat ratione notionis : quia Augustinus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>et Anselmus dicunt, quod suo verbo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>omnia dicit quae facit..Verbum autem est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>solus Filius. Ergo cum in verbo sint
ra<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="40"/>tiones creaturarum. videtur hoc esse
ra<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="41"/>tione notionis, et non nature.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e184">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>Solutio. Dicendum, quod ratione
na<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="43"/>ture insunt rationes rerum in Deo.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e191">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>Ad primum autem dicendum, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>creare persone actus est, prout persona
<lb ed="#Bb" n="46"/>est rationalis naturae individua
substan<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="47"/>tia: et haec persona adhuc esset Deus,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>etiamsi non esset Pater et Filius et
Spi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="49"/>ritus sanctus. Unde illa objectio non
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="50"/>bat, quod conveniat personis sic
distin<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="51"/>ctis ut fides distinguit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e211">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>Ad uLTimuM dicendum, quod hoc con-
<pb ed="#Bb" n="224"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>venit Filio appropriate, et non proprie,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>sicut esse sapientiam et artem Patris, ut
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>supra ostensum est: et ideo non
remo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="4"/>vet quin conveniat substantiae per se.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e231">
<cb ed="#Bb" n="c"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>F. Quod non omnia quae ex Deo sunt, etiam de ipso sunt: sed e converso.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c42123-d1e239">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="6"/>Illud etiam hic annectendum est, quod non omnia quae dicuntur esse ex
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>Deo, etiam de ipso esse dici debeant. Quia, ut ait Augustinus in libro de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="8"/>Natura bont: Non hoc significat penitus ex ipso, quod de ipso. Quod enim
<lb ed="#Bb" n="9"/>de ipso est, potest dici esse ex ipso: sed non omne quod ex ipso est,
pot<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="10"/>est dici esse de ipso, quia non est de sua substantia. Ex ipso enim sunt
<lb ed="#Bb" n="11"/>coelum et terra, quia ipse fecit ea: non autem de ipso, quia non de
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="12"/>stantia sua. Sicut aliquis homo si generat filium, et faciat domum, ex ipso
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>est filius, ex ipso est et domus: sed filius de ipso, domus vero de terra et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="14"/>ligno, non de ipso’.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>