-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c45715.xml
151 lines (151 loc) · 6.9 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c45715.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 10</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 10</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="242"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c45715"><!-- l1d37a10 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c45715-Hd1e99">Articulus 10</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c45715-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An idem sit essentialiter, praesentialiter,
et potentialiter inesse ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e104">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="242"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>ARTICULUS X.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>An idem sit essentialiter, praesentialiter,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>et potentialiter inesse ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e117">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="4"/>Deinde queritur de hoc quod dicit,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>ibi, B, circa medium: <quote xml:id="alalal-c45715-Qd1e123"> Jia et Deus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="6"/>cum sit in omnibus essentialiter et totus,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e131">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="8"/>Potest enim queri, Utrum idem sit
es<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="9"/>sentialiter inesse quod presentialiter
<lb ed="#Bb" n="10"/>inesse, et potentialiter inesse?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e141">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="11"/>Si enim idem est : tunc videtur, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="12"/>sufficiebat dicere essentialiter imesse, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>non oportebat addere presentialiter et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="14"/>potentiahbter. Videtur autem quod sit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>idem per Boetium, Anselmum et
Augu<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="16"/>stinum, qui exponunt unum pro alio, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="17"/>per aliud.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e159">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>Uxrerius queritur, Utrum melius est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="19"/>creaturam esse in Deo, vel Deum in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="20"/>creatura esse ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e168">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="21"/>1. Videtur autem, quod melius est
crea<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="22"/>turam esse in Deo : quia hoc est
xter<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="23"/>num, aliud autem ex tempore.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e177">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>2. Item, Creatura in Deo est creatrix
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>essentia, creator autem in creatura
re<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="26"/>linquit essentiam creatam : ergo nobilius
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>et melius est creaturam esse in Creatore,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>quam e converso.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e190">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>SED CONTRA :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>Omne simpliciter melius est, quam est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>secundum quid : creatura autem in
Crea<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="32"/>tore non est nisi secundum quid : cum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>autem Creator est in creatura, habet
es<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="34"/>se simpliciter : ergo melius est
Creato<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="35"/>rem esse in creatura, quam e converso.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e208">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>Solutio dicendum, quod hujusmodi
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>questiones parum valent.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e216">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>Ad primum bene concedo, quod non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>est idem : et qualiter variantur
hujus<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="40"/>modi modi, satis patet. Ad id quod
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="41"/>tra objicitur, dicendum quod Sancti ex-
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>ponunt unum per aliud, per hoc quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>sequitur unum ad aliud : ad inesse enim
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>presentialiter et potentialiter, sequitur
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>inesse essentialiter : quia aliter in Deo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="46"/>esset contractior natura quam potentia,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>ut supra expeditum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e242">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod comparatio
<lb ed="#Bb" n="49"/>nulla est : quia inesse dicitur equivoce :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>quia creatura est in Creatore secundum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>quid tantum, scilicet secundum ideam,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>ut causam in causa operante per
intelle<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="53"/>ctum: Creator autem est in creatura
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="54"/>tinens et salvans et replens : et ideo
ni<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="55"/>hil valet.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c45715-d1e262">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="56"/>Si autem tu queras, Quod sit melius
<lb ed="#Bb" n="57"/>et verius esse creature ?
<lb ed="#Bb" n="58"/>Ad hoc solutum est supra distinctione
<lb ed="#Bb" n="59"/>XXXV.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>