-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c46176.xml
189 lines (189 loc) · 8.87 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c46176.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 12</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 12</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="244"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c46176"><!-- l1d37a12 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c46176-Hd1e99">Articulus 12</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c46176-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An Deus sit in se et habitet in se ? et,
Utrum potest concedi, quod Deus
nusquam est, et quod est alibi quam in
seipso ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="22"/>ARTICULUS XII.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="23"/>An Deus sit in se et habitet in se ? et,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>Utrum potest concedi, quod Deus
nus<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="25"/>quam est, et quod est alibi quam in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="26"/>seipso ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e117">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>Incidit autem dubium, Utrum Deus sit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>in se, vel habitet in se ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e124">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>4. Videtur autem, quod non :
preposi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="30"/>tiones enim transitive sunt : ergo
que<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="31"/>runt diversitatem : Deus autem ad se
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>nullam habet diversitatem : ergo non est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>in seipso,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e138">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>2. Item, Philosophus dicit, quod
om<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="35"/>nes ponebant hoc quod nihil est in
seip<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="36"/>so : ergo nec Deus est in seipso.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e147">
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>ULrerivs queritur, Utrum hoc
conce<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="38"/>dendum sit, quod Deus nusquam est ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e156">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>Videtur, quod non : quia contrarium
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>estin Letfera, ubi dicit Augustinus, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="41"/>nullus audet dicere, quod Deus nusquam
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>sit. Sed conrra : Quod non proprie est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>in aliquo loco, id nusquam est proprie :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>Deus non proprie est in loco aliquo :
er<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="45"/>go nusquam est proprie.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e174">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="46"/>Item gqueritur ulterius, Utrum
conce<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="47"/>dendum sit, quod Deus est alibi quam in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>selpso ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e183">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="49"/>Videtur, quod sic : quia est in crea~
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>turis omnibus, quae non sunt ipse : ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>est in aliis quam in se : ergo est alibi
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>quam in se.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e194">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="53"/>Utrerivus queritur, Utrum
conceden<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="54"/>dum sit, quod est in alio quam in se?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e202">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="55"/>Et videtur, quod sic : quia est in la-.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="56"/>pide : ergo est in alio quam in se.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e209">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="57"/>Solutio. Dicendum est, quod Deus est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="58"/>in seipso.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e216">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="59"/>Ad id autem quod contra objicitur,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="60"/>dicendum quod transitioni praepositionis
<lb ed="#Bb" n="61"/>sufficit diversitas modi intelligendi
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="62"/>dum attributa, ut dicatur in se esse,
se<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="63"/>cundum quod ipse dicitur ccelum Dei, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="64"/>Deus complens ccelum : sic enim est
cee<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="65"/>lum secundum quod continet se, ita quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="66"/>nihil sui est extra ipsum : contentum
au<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="67"/>tem est id quod est Deus, quod est intra
<lb ed="#Bb" n="68"/>suam majestatem, et essenti#e ambitum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="69"/>adequatum ei.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e242">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="70"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod nihil est in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="71"/>seipso uno et eodem modo acceptum :
-quia sic idem esset continens, et
conten<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="72"/>tum, et eadem ratione.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e251">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="73"/>Ad id quod ulterius queritur,
dicen<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="74"/>dum quod haec non videtur esse
conce<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="75"/>denda, Deus nusquam est : quia sicut
<lb ed="#Bb" n="76"/>dictum est supra, proprium Dei est esse
<lb ed="#Bb" n="77"/>ubique : et ideo hoc modo non convenit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="78"/>ei per translationem quod est adesse et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="79"/>inesse loco et locato, dando loco esse et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="80"/>continere, et locato replere et esse : un-
<pb ed="#Bb" n="245"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>de objectio supra facta supponit falsum :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>sed hoc verum est, quod non convenit ei
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>in loco esse ut locatum corpus querit
lo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="4"/>cum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e284">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod illa est
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="6"/>cedenda : quia comparativum adverbium
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>ponit comparationem inter ea quae
aequi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="8"/>voca sunt: quia non est habitudo eadem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="9"/>prepositionis cum dicitur Deus esse in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="10"/>seipso, et cum dicitur esse in omnibus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="11"/>rebus, uf patet ex pradictis. Et si esset
<lb ed="#Bb" n="12"/>eadem habitudo, videretur notari, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>esset alibi, et non in seipso : et hoc est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="14"/>falsum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c46176-d1e309">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod hanc bene
<lb ed="#Bb" n="16"/>concederem, Deus est in alio et in
seip<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="17"/>so : sed non hanc, Deusest in alio quam
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>in seipso: et hujus causa dicta est : quia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="19"/>comparatio querit univocam rationem in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="20"/>comparatis : et illa non est hic.
Preter<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="21"/>ea, querit unam negativam, et aliam
<lb ed="#Bb" n="22"/>affirmativam. Unde videtur sequi, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="23"/>non esset in seipso, si diceretur esse in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>alio quam in seipso: sicut est in aliis,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>cum dicitur, Socrates est alibi quam
Pa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="26"/>risiis, vel Socrates est in alia re quam in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>Ecclesia, vel quam sit ipse.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>