-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c50541.xml
168 lines (168 loc) · 8.62 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c50541.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 25</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 25</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="266"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c50541"><!-- l1d37a25 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c50541-Hd1e99">Articulus 25</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c50541-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An in uno loco spirituali possunt esse
duo spiritus sine coangustatione sui?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c50541-d1e104">
<cb ed="#Bb" n="d"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>ARTICULUS XXV.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>An in uno loco spirituali possunt esse
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>duo spiritus sine coangustatione sui?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c50541-d1e115">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>Deinde queritur de hoc quod dicit :
<cb ed="#Bb" n="e"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="41"/>
<quote xml:id="alalal-c50541-Qd1e123"> Si multi essent spiritus hic, non eo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>coangustarent locum, etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c50541-d1e129">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>Istud enim videtur esse contra
Dama<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="44"/>scenum dicentem sic : Est autem
intelli<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="45"/>gibilis locus, ubi intelligitur, et est
incor<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="46"/>porea natura, ubi nimirum est, et
opera<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="47"/>tur, et non corporaliter continetur, sed
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>intelligitur 1. Inde procedo sic : Sicut se
<lb ed="#Bb" n="49"/>habet locus corporalis ad corpus, ita se
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>habet locus intelligibilis ad spiritum : in
<pb ed="#Bb" n="267"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>Solutio.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>uno loco corporali non possunt esse
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="3"/>versa corpora sine coangustatione : ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="4"/>in uno loco spirituali non possunt esse
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>diversi spiritus sine coangustatione sui
<lb ed="#Bb" n="6"/>ut videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c50541-d1e167">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>Praeterea queritur juxta hoc, Quid
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="8"/>catur locus inielligibilis a Damasceno ?
<lb ed="#Bb" n="9"/>Si enim dicatur natura aliqua
intelligibi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="10"/>lis, ut est Deus, vel Angelus. Illud non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="11"/>videtur : quia unus Angelus non est
lo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="12"/>cus alterius Angeli, cum non sit terminus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>includens ipsum : similiter Magister
ne<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="14"/>gabit infra, quod Deus sit locus, et in
lo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="15"/>co proprie, cum non sit corporalis
natu<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="16"/>ra. Si vero dicatur locus intelligibilis,
lo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="17"/>cus in quo est intellectualis natura : tune
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>videtur idem esse locus intelligibilis, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="19"/>locus corporalis, et non esse distinctio
<lb ed="#Bb" n="20"/>inter locum corporalem, et locurn
spiri<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="21"/>tualem, ut videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c50541-d1e202">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="22"/>Soxutio. Dici potest, ut supra habitum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="23"/>est, quod res multipliciter sunt in loco :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>et quod locus dicitur multipliciter’: est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>enim locus proprie, et est locus per
trans<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="26"/>lationem aliquam a proprietate loci
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="27"/>ctus. Locus per translationem a
proprie<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="28"/>tate loci dictus, potest esse spiritualis
na<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="29"/>tura, sicut dicit Philosophus in III de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>Anima. Bene jam dicentes sunt, scilicet
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>Philosophi, animam esse locum
specie<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="32"/>rum rei, quod non tota sit intellectiva,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>et non actu, sed potentia est species. Et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>sumitur ibi locus a proprietate loci, que
<lb ed="#Bb" n="35"/>est salvare, eo quod species esse habent
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>incorruptibile in intellectu : quaemadmo-
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>dum in natura corporali res in proprio
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>loco salvatur : et quia specierum motus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>est ad intellectum possibilem, et
quie<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="40"/>scunt in ipso,et moventur ab ipso
immo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="41"/>bili existenti. Similiter possumus dicere,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>quod Deus locus intelligibilis est Angel:
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>et in sequenti capitulo dicit Beda, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>intra Deum currunt Angeli, quocumque
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>mittuntur ', eo quod continet eos et
am<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="46"/>bit ambitu virtutis continentis. Locus
au<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="47"/>tem proprie dicitur duobus modis, scilicet
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>diffinitive, et circumscriptive : et de
utro<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="49"/>que supra dictum est. Diffinitivus autem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>dicitur a Damasceno intellectualis locus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>ex relatione ad naturam intellectualem,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>que est Angelus : et ideo dividitur contra
<lb ed="#Bb" n="53"/>corporalem, quia corporalis dicitur ex
re<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="54"/>latione ad corporalem naturam
conten<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="55"/>tam per se vel per accidens in illo:
sic<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="56"/>ut accidentia dicimus in loco, quae
si<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="57"/>tualia sunt in loco. Et per hoc patet
so<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="58"/>lutio ad totum praeter primum,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c50541-d1e287">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="59"/>Ad guop dicendum, quod Magister
ac<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="60"/>cipit hic locum qui habet corporalem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="61"/>continentiam : cum enim spiritus non
re<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="62"/>pleat, cum quolibet corpore potest esse
<lb ed="#Bb" n="63"/>in eodem loco : et unus alium non
coan<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="64"/>gustabit : sed non sic est de loco
intelli<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="65"/>gibili, qui accipitur ex relatione loci ad
<lb ed="#Bb" n="66"/>intellectualem naturam diffinitam in ip~
<lb ed="#Bb" n="67"/>so, quae determinatur ad locum per
<lb ed="#Bb" n="68"/>opus : unam enim talem relationem
im<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="69"/>possibile est fieri ad duos Angelos : et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="70"/>ideo impossibile est duos Angelos esse
<lb ed="#Bb" n="71"/>in eodem loco.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>