-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c55375.xml
199 lines (199 loc) · 9.87 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c55375.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 3</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 3</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="294"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c55375"><!-- l1d39a3 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c55375-Hd1e99">Articulus 3</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c55375-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An Deus mutabilia sciat immutabiliter,
et opposita sciat eodem modo ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="67"/>ARTICULUS III.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="68"/>An Deus mutabilia sciat immutabiliter,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="69"/>et opposita sciat eodem modo ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="70"/>Ad secundum proceditur sic :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="71"/>Mutabilia scire immutabiliter, est
sci<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="72"/>re mutabilia aliter quam sunt: scire
<lb ed="#Bb" n="73"/>autem rem aliquam aliter quam est,
de<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="74"/>cipi est: ergo videtur, quod si Deus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="75"/>sciat mutabilia immutabiliter, quod ipse
<lb ed="#Bb" n="76"/>decipitur in eis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e131">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="77"/>Hic etiam cadit questio de scientia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="78"/>oppositorum, utrum illa sciat eodem
mo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="79"/>do ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e141">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="80"/>Videtur quod sic : quia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="81"/>1. Ipse eodem modo scit rem quando
<lb ed="#Bb" n="82"/>est, et quando non est: esse autem
<pb ed="#Bb" n="295"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>rem et non esse, sunt opposita
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="2"/>dum affirmationem et negationem : ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>ipse scit simul contradictoria, ut
vide<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="4"/>tur : ergo multo magis alia opposita.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e163">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>2. Item. Si tpse scit rem ut est,
opor<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="6"/>tet quod ipse sciat eam sub differentiis
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>temporis : ergo scit me lecturum
quan<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="8"/>do lecturus sum, et scit me legisse
quan<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="9"/>do legi, et scit me legere quando lego :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="10"/>omne autem quod cadit sub differentia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="11"/>temporis, est mutabile : ergo Deus scit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="12"/>mutabile temporaliter et mutabiliter, ut
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>videtur. Si autem tu dicas, quod non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="14"/>scit temporaliter res, sequitur ex hoc
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>quod nullam haberet scientiam de re
<lb ed="#Bb" n="16"/>quando est et quando non est, sed
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="17"/>distincte et confuse sciret res: et hoc
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>est imperfectum, et Deo non
attribuen<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="19"/>dum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e198">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="20"/>SED CONTRA :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="21"/>1. Omnis acceptio est secundum
potesta<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="22"/>tem accipientis, et non accepti : scientia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="23"/>est acceptio quedam, ut dicit
Philoso<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="24"/>phus : ergo est secundum potestatem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>accipientis, et non accepti: Deus autem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="26"/>sciens est immutabilis : ergo sua
scien<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="27"/>tia est immutabilis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e218">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>2. Praeterea, in Littera negatur hoc:
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>ergo videtur, quod sua scientia non sit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>de mutabilibus mutabiliter.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e227">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>Solutio. Leve est hoc solvere
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="32"/>dum supra dicta, scilicet quod ly
muta<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="33"/>biliter potest determinare verbum ex
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>parte materiae super quam transit
scien<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="35"/>tia, et sic scit Deus mutabilia
mutabili<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="36"/>ter, et temporalia temporaliter, et
oppo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="37"/>sita oppositis modis: vel potest referri
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>ad verbum per comparationem ad
scien<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="39"/>tem, et sic scit mutabilia immutabiliter,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>et temporalia intemporaliter, et
opposi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="41"/>ta uno modo simplici.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e253">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>decipitur : quia etiam apud nos scientia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>mutabilium ex parte scientis immuta-—
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>bilis est, quia ratio mutabilium
immu<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="46"/>tabilis est : sed cum ratio sit intentio rei
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>mutabilis, scitur rei mutabilitas per
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="48"/>tentionem illam quando refertur ad rem
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="49"/>cui accidit mutabilitas. Et hujus causa
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>est propter hoc quod per hoc quod est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>immutabilis, non refertur ad rem, sed
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>refertur ad ipsam secundum quod est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="53"/>ratio et intentio rei quae est mutabilis :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="54"/>et sic patet, qualiter in omnibus
muta<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="55"/>bile scitur immutabiliter.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e289">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="56"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod opposita
<lb ed="#Bb" n="57"/>scit Deus uno, quod est ratio rei sive
<lb ed="#Bb" n="58"/>sit, sive non sit : quia sibi res non
pot<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="59"/>est preterire, sed semper eodem modo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="60"/>manet, non tamen eodem modo transit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="61"/>ejus scientia super rem: vel ut fidelius
<lb ed="#Bb" n="62"/>dicatur, non uno modo comparatur ad
<lb ed="#Bb" n="63"/>ipsum res: et ideo scitrem esse cum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="64"/>est, et scit eam non esse cum non est,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="65"/>ex hoc quod comparatur res ad esse
<lb ed="#Bb" n="66"/>velad non esse : et hoc est magis de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="67"/>scientia complexorum sive
enuntiabi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="68"/>lium, de quibus posterius queretur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e320">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="69"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod ipse
intem<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="70"/>poraliter scit omnia quae cadunt sub
<lb ed="#Bb" n="71"/>temporis differentia: et hoc ideo est,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="72"/>quia differentia temporis accidit rei
se<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="73"/>cundum quod est in esse proprio, et non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="74"/>secundum quod est in Deo per ideam.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="75"/>Quod autem certus estin sciendo res
<lb ed="#Bb" n="76"/>distincte, hoc est ideo, quia non tantum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="77"/>scit rem, sed etiam quamlibet
composi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="78"/>tionem et divisionem rei cum qualibet
<lb ed="#Bb" n="79"/>vel a qualibet re : et hoc incomplexe et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="80"/>incomposite, ut infra dicetur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55375-d1e349">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="81"/>Et si tu objicias, quod noster
intelle<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="82"/>ctus non sic est de complexo sicut de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="83"/>incomplexo. Resronsio, quod hoc est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="84"/>ideo, quia intellectus noster per
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="85"/>stantiam non est suum intelligibile, nec
<lb ed="#Bb" n="86"/>ipse dat modum intelligibili, sed potius
<lb ed="#Bb" n="87"/>accipit ab ipso, et ideo variatur
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="88"/>dum illud : non autem sic de intellectu
<lb ed="#Bb" n="89"/>divino, qui est id per quod intelligit, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="90"/>dat intelligibili et esse in se, et omnem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="91"/>compositionem et divisionem.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>