-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c55654.xml
191 lines (191 loc) · 9.26 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c55654.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 4</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 4</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="296"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c55654"><!-- l1d39a4 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c55654-Hd1e99">Articulus 4</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c55654-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An Deus sciat actu infinita ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e104">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="296"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>ARTICULUS IV.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>An Deus sciat actu infinita ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e115">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>Deinde queritur de hoc quod dicit,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="4"/>ibi, A, sub finem :<quote xml:id="alalal-c55654-Qd1e121"> Pater et Filius
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>cum Spiritu sancto simul omnia sciunt
<lb ed="#Bb" n="6"/>ef vident. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e129">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>Potest enim adhuc dubium esse, licet
<lb ed="#Bb" n="8"/>supra expeditum sit, utrum Deus sciat
<lb ed="#Bb" n="9"/>actu infinita ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e139">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="10"/>Videtur autem quod sic: quia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="11"/>1. Cuilibet finito possibilis est
addi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="12"/>tio: sed scientiae Dei non potest fieri
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>additio : ergo ipsa est infinita.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e150">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="14"/>2. Item, Augustinus in libro XII de
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>Civitate Det dicit, quod species
nume<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="16"/>rorum infinite in se, non sunt infinite
<lb ed="#Bb" n="17"/>illius scientia, cujus scientiae non est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>numerus . Ergo videtur, quod actu sciat
<lb ed="#Bb" n="19"/>infinita.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e166">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="20"/>SED CONTRA :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="21"/>1. Quidquid scitur, scientis
comprehen<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="22"/>sione finitur, praecipue si perfecte scit :_
<lb ed="#Bb" n="23"/>ergo si Deus scit infinitum, ipse sciendo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>finit ipsum : ergo non est infinitum
sim<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="25"/>pliciter.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e182">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="26"/>2. Praeterea, Infinitum in se non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>potest intelligi qualiter alii sit finitum :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>ergo nec Deo erit finitum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e191">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>3. Item, Species numerorum non sunt
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>infinite actu, sed potentia : si ergo Deus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>scit ipsas esse infinitas, ipse scit quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="32"/>non est, quod est impossibile.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e202">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>Ad hoc dicunt quidam, quod triplex
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>est scientia, scilicet intelligentiea, et
vi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="35"/>sionis, et approbationis : et scientia
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="36"/>telligentig# est, qua intelligitur res
sim<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="37"/>pliciter. Vistonis autem scientia est,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>que transit super res secundum quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>sunt vel non sunt sub differentia
hu<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="40"/>jus compositionis vel illius. Approba-
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="41"/>tionis autem scientia est, quae est de,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>bonis quorum Deus auctor est. Sed con-,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>cra hoc objicitur : Ila scientia quae
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="44"/>citur intelligentia, aut est finita per
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>intelligibilis rationem idealem, aut non.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="46"/>Si dicas, quod sic: sed unicuique idew
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>respondet ideatum, vel potest
responde<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="48"/>re: ergo ili idee quae est infiniti,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="49"/>respondet ideatum, vel potest
responde<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="50"/>re: ergo infinitum potest esse actu :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>quod ego intelligere non possum, si est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="52"/>verum.,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e251">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="53"/>Item, si dicas quod illa idea "non est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="54"/>ad hoc ut educi possit ideatum sub ipsa,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="55"/>sed quod Deus illa cognoscat infinitum,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="56"/>Contra: Aut cognoscit ut est, aut
ali<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="57"/>ter. Si aliter, non habet veram
scien<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="58"/>tiam ipsius. Si autem ut est, cum ipsum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="59"/>nec sit nec possit esse nisi in potentia,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="60"/>intelligentia non erit nisi in potentia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="61"/>infiniti : et de hoc non contendimus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e273">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="62"/>Solutio. Mihi videtur, quod actu
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="63"/>finitum semper. est imperfectum, nec
<lb ed="#Bb" n="64"/>in Deo est, nec in natura: sed
infini<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="65"/>tum ut est finitum, bene concedo quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="66"/>cognoscit Deus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e286">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="67"/>Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod
im<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="68"/>possibile est Deo fieri additionem ali~
<lb ed="#Bb" n="69"/>quam: quia ipse est majus aliquid
<lb ed="#Bb" n="70"/>quam cogitare possumus: quod non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="71"/>intelligitur dimensive, vel multitudine,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="72"/>cum ipse sit unum solum et simplex :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="73"/>sed quia nihil boni cogitari potest, quin
<lb ed="#Bb" n="74"/>ipse sit illud, et plus quam cogitari
<lb ed="#Bb" n="75"/>potest : infinitum autem nihil boni et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="76"/>perfecti est, sed potius imperfectum :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="77"/>ideo non intelligitur sic: quia, ut
su<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="78"/>pra diximus, etiam intelligi potest
qua<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="79"/>liter infinitum includat infinitum : tamen
<lb ed="#Bb" n="80"/>multa sunt gue cogitamus, quae non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="81"/>sunt Deus: nec hoc est imperfectionis,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="82"/>sed perfectionis : et sua scientia hoc
<lb ed="#Bb" n="83"/>modo infinita est: quia nihil potest
<lb ed="#Bb" n="84"/>cogitari vel esse, quod si esset, non esset
<lb ed="#Bb" n="85"/>in scientia ipsius, et modo secundum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="86"/>quod est in scientia sua: quia ipse in-
<pb ed="#Bb" n="297"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>telligendo se infinita posse, intelligit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>infinita secundum quod sunt infinitain
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>potentia.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c55654-d1e343">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="4"/>AD SOLUTIONEM autem inductam
re<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="5"/>spondeo, quod aut non intelligo eam, positum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="6"/>aut intelligentia non dicit nisi relationem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>intellectus ad rem, prout est
quocum<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="8"/>que modo, scilicet in potentia, vel in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="9"/>ratione ideali comparationem habente ad
<lb ed="#Bb" n="10"/>id quod erit in actu, sicut supra est ex-
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>