-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c63299.xml
151 lines (151 loc) · 7.25 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c63299.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 19</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 19</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="333"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c63299"><!-- l1d40a19 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c63299-Hd1e99">Articulus 19</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c63299-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Utrum electio secundum rationem
intelligentiae sit anie praedestinationem,
vel post ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c63299-d1e104">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="333"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>ARTICULUS XIX.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>Utrum electio secundum rationem
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="3"/>telligentiae sit anie praedestinationem,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="4"/>vel post ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c63299-d1e120">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>Tertio queritur, Utrum electio
secun<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="6"/>dum rationem intelligentiae sit ante
pre<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="7"/>destinationem, vel post?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c63299-d1e129">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="8"/>Videtur autem, quod ante : quia
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c63299-d1e135">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="9"/>1, Non eligilur in regnum, nisi
sepa<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="10"/>ratus a massa perditionis : ergo
prade<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="11"/>stinatio presupponit factam electionem.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="12"/>Sed contra : Dilectio secundum rationem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="13"/>videtur sequi praedestinationem.
Proga<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="14"/>Tio: Dilectio est boni: bonus autem non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>est nisi per gratiam: et gratia est ex
<lb ed="#Bb" n="16"/>predestinatione : ergo et dilectio :
dile<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="17"/>ctionem autem sequitur electio, quia non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>eligit nisi quos diligit : ergo electio etiam
<lb ed="#Bb" n="19"/>sequitur pradestinationem: quod enim
<lb ed="#Bb" n="20"/>est prius priore, prius est etiam
poste<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="21"/>riore.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c63299-d1e166">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="22"/>2. Item, Ad Ephes.1, 4et 5: Llegit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="23"/>nos in ipso ante mundi constitulionem,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>qui praedestinavit nos in adoptionem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="25"/>filiorum per Jesum Christum in ipsum,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="26"/>secundum propositum voluntatis sue:
<lb ed="#Bb" n="27"/>ergo propositum voluntatis, ratio est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>electionis : ergo est prius ipsa secundum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>rationem intelligentiae: propositum
au<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="30"/>tem voluntatis est praedestimatio: ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>predestinatio est prior electione, ut
vi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="32"/>detur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c63299-d1e192">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="33"/>Solutio. Dicendum mihi videtur, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="34"/>electio absolute sumpta praecedit
pra<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="35"/>destinationem, ut dicit prima ratio, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>dilectio sumpliciter dicta prascedit
utrum<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="37"/>que: et hoc sic patet : Dilectio declinat
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>ad separandum unum ab alio, et ad
dil<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="39"/>gendum in finem salutis : ergo precedit
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>dilectio electionem, et electio
predesti<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="41"/>nationem ex parte diligentis et eligentis
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>et praedestinantis. Simuliter dilectio est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>bon electio autem finahter boni :
pre<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="44"/>destinatio autem boni finaliter, et in
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>finem salutis directi: et sic patet
quali<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="46"/>ter objectum unius addit super objectum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>alterius : et sic iterum dilectio prior et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>simplhiior est electione, et electio
pra<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="49"/>destinatione.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c63299-d1e234">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="50"/>Av w quod in contrarium objicitur,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="51"/>dicendum quod illa dilectio de qua
ob<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="52"/>jreit, est dilectio ex presenti justitia, non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="53"/>dilectio aeterna.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c63299-d1e245">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="54"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod Apostolus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="55"/>non intendit, quod praedestinatio sit
<lb ed="#Bb" n="56"/>ratio elections in se, sed potius e
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="57"/>verso : sed vult dicere, quod sit ratio
<lb ed="#Bb" n="58"/>electionis ex parte effectus qui est
appo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="59"/>sitio gratiae, quia illus non est causa
<lb ed="#Bb" n="60"/>nisi proposituin Der. Unde, ad Roman. rx,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="61"/>11 et 12, dicit e contra: Ut secundum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="62"/>electionem propositum Dei maneret, non
<lb ed="#Bb" n="63"/>ex opertbus, sed ex voluntate' dictum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="64"/>est et: Quia major serviet minori: ubi
<lb ed="#Bb" n="65"/>expresse innuitur, quod electio
propo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="66"/>siti sive praedestinationis est ratio.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>