-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c76344.xml
151 lines (151 loc) · 7.1 KB
/
cod-al7b26_alalal-c76344.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 2</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 2</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bb" n="cod-al7b26">Paris 1894, v. 26</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bb" n="403"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-c76344"><!-- l1d45a2 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-c76344-Hd1e99">Articulus 2</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-c76344-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Quid est voluntas divina ? et, An sit idem
cum Det essentra ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-c76344-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="75"/>ARTICULUS II.
<lb ed="#Bb" n="76"/>Quid est voluntas divina ? et, An sit idem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="77"/>cum Det essentra ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c76344-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="78"/>Deinde queritur, Quid sit voluntas
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="79"/>vina ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c76344-d1e120">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="80"/>Videtur autem, quod non sit essentia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="81"/>divina : quia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="82"/>1. Quecumque sunt eadem, omne id
<lb ed="#Bb" n="83"/>quod attribuitur uni, potest attribui
alte<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="84"/>ri: sed multa sunt in voluntate, que
<lb ed="#Bb" n="85"/>non sunt in essentia : sicut omnia bona
<lb ed="#Bb" n="86"/>creata quae sunt in voluntate Dei
conti<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="87"/>nente et volente ea, non tamen omnia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="88"/>sunt in essentia : ergo voluntas et
essen<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="89"/>tia non sunt idem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c76344-d1e145">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="90"/>2. Item, Quecumque sunt eadem
om<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="91"/>nino, idem additum utrique adhuc non
<pb ed="#Bb" n="404"/>
<cb ed="#Bb" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="1"/>facit diversa, sed remanent idem : si ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="2"/>voluntas Dei est essentia Dei, et voluntas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="3"/>hujus est essentia hujus: sed voluntas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="4"/>hujus est, demonstrato homuine creato :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="5"/>ergo Deus est essentia hujus, quod
fal<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="6"/>sum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c76344-d1e169">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="7"/>3. S1 forte dicatur, quod voluntas
dif<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="8"/>fert ab essentia, non in se, sed in
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="9"/>notato. Contra: De ratione voluntatis
<lb ed="#Bb" n="10"/>non est ut aliquid connotet : possum enim
<lb ed="#Bb" n="11"/>dicere, Deus vult se esse trinum et unum,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="12"/>et vult generare Filum : et nihil
conno<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="13"/>tatur extra Deum : ergo videtur, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="14"/>hoc non sit substantiale voluntati, quod
<lb ed="#Bb" n="15"/>aliquid connotet: ergo videtur, quod
vo<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="16"/>luntas Dei non sit essentia Dei.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c76344-d1e193">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="17"/>SED CONTRA
<lb ed="#Bb" n="18"/>Quidquid non est totum quod habet,
il<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="19"/>lud non est simplex : voluntas habetur
<lb ed="#Bb" n="20"/>ex Deo, et ipse non est sua voluntas :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="21"/>ergo Deus non est simplex, quod falsum
<lb ed="#Bb" n="22"/>est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c76344-d1e209">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="23"/>Solutio. Dicendum, quod voluntas est
<lb ed="#Bb" n="24"/>essentia Dei : sed differt in modo
signili<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="25"/>candi, sicut sepius supra de atiributis
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="26"/>vinis ostensum est : et ideo non valet
ob<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="27"/>jectum primum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c76344-d1e222">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="28"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod verum est,
<lb ed="#Bb" n="29"/>ubi id quod additur utrique, in eadem
<lb ed="#Bb" n="30"/>ratione additur in qua illa sunt eadem :
<lb ed="#Bb" n="31"/>sed hoc non fit hic : sed potuus cum
di<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="32"/>citur voluntas hujus, ly hajus dicit
ob<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="33"/>jectum voluntatis secundum rationem
in<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="34"/>telligendi quae differt ab essentia : et ideo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="35"/>non oportet, quod sit essentia hujus : et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="36"/>bene sequitur sic : Intellectus et voluntas
<lb ed="#Bb" n="37"/>sunt idem in re: sed realiter intellectus
<lb ed="#Bb" n="38"/>Dei non differt a Dei voluntate: ergo
<lb ed="#Bb" n="39"/>realiter essentia Dei et intellectus sunt
<lb ed="#Bb" n="40"/>idem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-c76344-d1e253">
<lb ed="#Bb" n="41"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod voluntas Dei
<lb ed="#Bb" n="42"/>non semper connotat volitum extra, vel
<lb ed="#Bb" n="43"/>etiam respectum ad volitum extra : quia
<lb ed="#Bb" n="44"/>eterna est, et respectu aeternorum : sed
<lb ed="#Bb" n="45"/>ab essentia semper differt in modo
signi<lb break="no" ed="#Bb" n="46"/>ficandi et intelligendi, quia sicut supra
<cb ed="#Bb" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bb" n="47"/>probatum est, substantia, voluntas, et
<lb ed="#Bb" n="48"/>intellectus non sunt synonyma.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>