-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b27_alalal-d59802.xml
264 lines (264 loc) · 13.1 KB
/
cod-al7b27_alalal-d59802.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 2</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 2</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bc" n="cod-al7b27">Paris 1894, v. 27</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bc" n="330"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-d59802"><!-- l2d19a2 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-d59802-Hd1e99">Articulus 2</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-d59802-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Utrum primus homo in corpore immor=
talis esse potuerit? et, Utrum Adam
am prime statu animam accepissel
passibilem vel corpus passibile?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="8"/>ARTICULUS HW.
<lb ed="#Bc" n="9"/>Utrum primus homo in corpore immor=
<lb ed="#Bc" n="10"/>talis esse potuerit? et, Utrum Adam
<lb ed="#Bc" n="11"/>am prime statu animam accepissel
pas<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="12"/>sibilem vel corpus passibile?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e117">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="13"/>Secundo queritur, Utrum homo
im<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="14"/>mortalis esse potuerit secundum corpus
<lb ed="#Bc" n="15"/>in primo statu '.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e126">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="16"/>Et videtur, quod sic : quia
<lb ed="#Bc" n="17"/>1. Peena non precedit culpam : mors
<lb ed="#Bc" n="18"/>autem maxima poenarum est : ergo ante
<lb ed="#Bc" n="19"/>peccatum hominis accedere non potuit :
<lb ed="#Bc" n="20"/>ergo ante peccatum homo immortalis
<lb ed="#Bc" n="21"/>fuit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e143">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="22"/>2. Item, Sapient. 1, 13-16 : Deus
mor<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="23"/>tem non fecit... Lmpii antem manibus ac
<lb ed="#Bc" n="24"/>verbis accersierunt illam. Ergo videtur,
<lb ed="#Bc" n="25"/>quod numquam fuisset mors acquisita,
<lb ed="#Bc" n="26"/>nisi verbis et manibusimpiorum, serpen~
<lb ed="#Bc" n="27"/>tis scilicet loqguentis, et Hevee manus
ex<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="28"/>tendentis: ergo ante impietatem illam
<lb ed="#Bc" n="29"/>homo fuit immortalis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e163">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="30"/>3. Item, Hoc secundum justitiam Dei
<lb ed="#Bc" n="31"/>esset animam remanere semper sub
re<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="32"/>gente se per obedientiam, et permanere
<lb ed="#Bc" n="33"/>corpus sub regimine suo ad imperium
<lb ed="#Bc" n="34"/>suum : ergo numquam ;fuisset corpus
<lb ed="#Bc" n="35"/>separatum ab anima: sed ipsa sub Dei
<lb ed="#Bc" n="36"/>obedientia semper permansisset, si non
<lb ed="#Bc" n="37"/>peccasset: ergo corpus per mortem
num<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="38"/>quam fuisset dissolutum,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e185">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="39"/>4. Item, Dicit Isidiorus, quod si homo
<lb ed="#Bc" n="40"/>non peccasset, nec ignis combureret, nec
<cb ed="#Bc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bc" n="41"/>spina pungeret, nec gladius secaret : ep,
<lb ed="#Bc" n="42"/>geo videtur, quod vere immortalis fuisset.:
<lb ed="#Bc" n="43"/>et hoc idem dicitur in Liééera, et ab Ay.”
<lb ed="#Bc" n="44"/>gustine habetur, ut patet.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e203">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="45"/>SED CONTRA:
<lb ed="#Bc" n="46"/>1. Homo habuit im primo statu corpus
<lb ed="#Bc" n="47"/>compositum ex contrariis : ergo pugna
<lb ed="#Bc" n="48"/>erat in corpore suo: ergo corpus poterat
<lb ed="#Bc" n="49"/>infirmari, et dissolvi compositum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e216">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="50"/>2. Item, Omne compositum ex
grayi<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="51"/>bus et levibus, componitur ex his
quo<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="52"/>rum motus secundum locum sunt contra.
<lb ed="#Bc" n="53"/>rii: hac autem quandoque separabuntur
<lb ed="#Bc" n="54"/>et distabunt, ut dicit Philosophus in TV de
<lb ed="#Bc" n="55"/>Celo et Mundo: ergo videtur, quod
ho<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="56"/>mo cum sic esset in primo statu
compo<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="57"/>situs, esset corruptibilis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e236">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="58"/>3. Item, Molle corpus habuit : ergo
<lb ed="#Bc" n="59"/>secabile et divisibile.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e244">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="60"/>4. Item, Philosophus dicit, quod
<lb ed="#Bc" n="61"/>omne generatum corrumpetur tempore
<lb ed="#Bc" n="62"/>determinato : corpus Ade erat quoddam
<lb ed="#Bc" n="63"/>simile generato: ergo corruptum fuisset
<lb ed="#Bc" n="64"/>tempore determinato.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e257">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="65"/>Sed quia he rationes nihil valent, eo
<lb ed="#Bc" n="66"/>quod Philosophi de hoc statu nature
<lb ed="#Bc" n="67"/>numquam aliquid cognovissent,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e266">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="68"/>Quaratur ulterius, Si animam in
<lb ed="#Bc" n="69"/>primo statu accepit passibilem, vel
cor<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="70"/>pus passibile ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e275">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="71"/>Videtur quod non: quia anima non
<lb ed="#Bc" n="72"/>proprie patitur nisi ex corporis passione:
<lb ed="#Bc" n="73"/>ergo videtur si tune corpus pati non
<lb ed="#Bc" n="74"/>potuit, quod nec anima cumpati.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e286">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="75"/>SED CONTRA :
<lb ed="#Bc" n="76"/>4. Cognoscere potuit: non autem
co<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="77"/>gnoscit nisi per receptionem cogniti, et
<lb ed="#Bc" n="78"/>recipere est quoddam pati : ergo animam
<lb ed="#Bc" n="79"/>habuit passibilem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e299">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="80"/>2. Item, Appetere potuit: et appetitus
<lb ed="#Bc" n="81"/>non fit nisi aliquid patiente potentia
ap<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="82"/>petitiva: ergo potuit pati.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e309">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="83"/>3. Item, Contraria nata sunt fieri circa
<lb ed="#Bc" n="84"/>idem : et gaudere potuit: ergo et tristari:
<lb ed="#Bc" n="85"/>ergo sentire poenam: quia tristitia est
<lb ed="#Bc" n="86"/>de sensu peene.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e320">
<pb ed="#Bc" n="331"/>
<cb ed="#Bc" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Bc" n="1"/>Sorutro. Disputatio ista per has
ratio<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="2"/>nes nihil valet. Videtur mihi, quod cum
<lb ed="#Bc" n="3"/>queritur, Utruam homo mortalis vel
im<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="4"/>mortalis fuerit in primo statu?
distin<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="5"/>guendum esse. Cum igitur dicitur
im<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="6"/>mortalis, potest fieri privatio actus
mor<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="7"/>tis: et sic conceditur ab omnibus, quod
<lb ed="#Bc" n="8"/>erat immortalis, manens in primo statu.
<lb ed="#Bc" n="9"/>Potest autem fieri privatio potentie
<lb ed="#Bc" n="10"/>moriendi: et hoc adhue dupliciter,
scili<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="11"/>cet potenti disposite ad moriendum per
<lb ed="#Bc" n="12"/>habitum immortalitatis: et adhuc
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="13"/>ceditur quod erat immortalis, quoniam
<lb ed="#Bc" n="14"/>non habebat hujusmodi potentiam ad
<lb ed="#Bc" n="15"/>moriendum, sed potius dispositionem
<lb ed="#Bc" n="16"/>contrariam morti: vel potest privare
po<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="17"/>tentiam solam quae materialis dicitur,
<lb ed="#Bc" n="18"/>et tantum est in materialibus et
natura<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="19"/>libus principiis: et hoc modo non
vide<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="20"/>tur fuisse immortalis, sed potius
morta<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="21"/>lis: quoniam potentiam materialem et
<lb ed="#Bc" n="22"/>naturalem habuit moriendi, licet esset
<lb ed="#Bc" n="23"/>ligata per contrarium habitum: et est
<lb ed="#Bc" n="24"/>sicut potentia aperiendi in ostio volubili
<lb ed="#Bc" n="25"/>quidem in cardine, sed clauso firmissimo
<lb ed="#Bc" n="26"/>repagulo ne aperiatur. De hoc infinite
<lb ed="#Bc" n="27"/>possunt adduci auctoritates '.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e385">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="28"/>AD RATIONES ergo quae videniur
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="29"/>bare, quod fuerit corruptibilis et
morta<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="30"/>is: dicendum primo, quod Philosophi
<lb ed="#Bc" n="31"/>de hac immortalitate nihil cognoverunt,
<lb ed="#Bc" n="32"/>nec aliquid locuti sunt: deinde potest
<lb ed="#Bc" n="33"/>dici, quod tenent ille rationes quoad
na<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="34"/>turalia principia Ade: sed illa exire in
<lb ed="#Bc" n="35"/>actum moriendi non poterant, eo quod
<lb ed="#Bc" n="36"/>erant ligata habitu immortalitatis per
<lb ed="#Bc" n="37"/>gratiam, ut infra patebit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e409">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="38"/>Ap ip quod ulterius querilur, Utrum
<lb ed="#Bc" n="39"/>fait passibilis? Dicendum, quod de
pas<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="40"/>sibilitate anime disputatum est in TIL
<lb ed="#Bc" n="41"/>Senientiarum, in tractatu de Passione
<lb ed="#Bc" n="42"/>anime Christ? tantum : tamen potest
<lb ed="#Bc" n="43"/>hic dici, quod pati dicitur a Greece naoew,
<lb ed="#Bc" n="44"/>quod est recipere Latine: et sic passibilis
<lb ed="#Bc" n="45"/>fuit et in corpore, et in anima: guia in
<lb ed="#Bc" n="46"/>anima recepit species, et in corpore ci-
<cb ed="#Bc" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Bc" n="47"/>bum. Dicitur etiam pati a contrario
affi<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="48"/>ciente passum et transmutante: et sic
<lb ed="#Bc" n="49"/>non potuit pati nec in anima propter
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="50"/>bitum gratie primi status, qui
contra<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="51"/>rius erat huic passioni, nec permisit eam
<lb ed="#Bc" n="52"/>cadere in eum. Dicitur etiam pati a
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="53"/>trario alterante et abjiciente a
substan<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="54"/>tia : et sic nullo modo erat passibilis, nec
<lb ed="#Bc" n="55"/>in corpore, nec in anima.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e453">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="56"/>Ad id autem quod objicitur, quod
con<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="57"/>traria nata sunt fieri circa idem,
dicen<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="58"/>dum quod non valet: si enim alterum
<lb ed="#Bc" n="59"/>inest per naturam ut igni caliditas, tunc
<lb ed="#Bc" n="60"/>non tenet. Item, Si alterum inest per
<lb ed="#Bc" n="61"/>confirmationem, iterum non tenet: quia
<lb ed="#Bc" n="62"/>beatis inest latitia, et non potest inesse
<lb ed="#Bc" n="63"/>tristitia: et dammnatis tristitia, et non
<lb ed="#Bc" n="64"/>potest inesse eis letitia. Ita Ade per
ex<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="65"/>perimentum infuit bonum et gaudium:
<lb ed="#Bc" n="66"/>et malum et contristans non potuit
<lb ed="#Bc" n="67"/>inesse, nisi prius peccaret, propter
ha<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="68"/>bitum innocentie se conservantem ab
<lb ed="#Bc" n="69"/>omni contristante et lesivo.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-d59802-d1e486">
<lb ed="#Bc" n="70"/>Tamen de impassibilitate potest fieri
<lb ed="#Bc" n="71"/>talis distinctio qualis habita est in
im<lb break="no" ed="#Bc" n="72"/>mortatitate.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>