-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-e26673.xml
121 lines (121 loc) · 5.49 KB
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-e26673.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 6</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 6</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bd" n="cod-al7b28">Paris 1894, v. 28</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bd" n="135"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-e26673"><!-- l3d6a6 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-e26673-Hd1e99">Articulus 6</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-e26673-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An Christus possit dici compositus ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-e26673-d1e104">
<lb ed="Bd" n="8"/>ARTICULUS VI.
<lb ed="Bd" n="9"/>An Christus possit dici compositus ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e26673-d1e111">
<lb ed="Bd" n="10"/>Sunt autem pauca dubia contra hanc
<lb ed="Bd" n="11"/>opinionem, ideo quod liquide contineat
<lb ed="Bd" n="12"/>veritatem. Sed iamen dubium potest
<lb ed="Bd" n="13"/>esse de prima sui positione, quod dicit
<lb ed="Bd" n="14"/>Christum esse compositum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e26673-d1e124">
<lb ed="Bd" n="15"/>i. Omne enim compositum
compo<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="16"/>mentia sua unit in tertic : haec autem
<lb ed="Bd" n="17"/>unio facta est In personam sternam :
<lb ed="Bd" n="18"/>ergo non est compositus Christus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e26673-d1e136">
<lb ed="Bd" n="19"/>2, item, In omni composito utrumque
<lb ed="Bd" n="20"/>componentium est pars: deitas autem
<lb ed="Bd" n="21"/>non potest dici pars: quia cum omnis
<lb ed="Bd" n="22"/>pars minus aliquid sit suo tote, jam
<lb ed="Bd" n="23"/>deitas haberet aliquid majus et melius,
<lb ed="Bd" n="24"/>quod inconvenientissimum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e26673-d1e152">
<lb ed="Bd" n="25"/>Item, Cum omnis pars sit imperfecta
<lb ed="Bd" n="26"/>respectu totius, jam deitas esset
imper<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="27"/>fecta, quod iterum faisum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e26673-d1e161">
<lb ed="Bd" n="28"/>Ad Hoc dicendum, quod ista opinio
<lb ed="Bd" n="29"/>non acciptt compositionem secundum
<lb ed="Bd" n="30"/>naturam, sed secundum nomen iantum,
<lb ed="Bd" n="31"/>ul sit compositum idem quod cum alio
<lb ed="Bd" n="32"/>positum in eodem quod fuit ante: licet
<lb ed="Bd" n="33"/>hoc modo non omnino fuerit sicut nunc
<lb ed="Bd" n="34"/>est ; et ite persona Christi est
composi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="35"/>ta, quia modo est in duabus naturis, et
<lb ed="Bd" n="36"/>tribus subsiantiis : unde haec opinic
<lb ed="Bd" n="37"/>neulram naturarum dicit esse partem :
<lb ed="Bd" n="38"/>guia deitas pars esse non potest, ut
pro<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="39"/>bant objectiones : humanitas autem licet
<lb ed="Bd" n="40"/>habeat partes, non tamen est pars: quia
<lb ed="Bd" n="41"/>omnis pars habet compartem, eo quod
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="42"/>nulla una pars facit ictum : unde
huma<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="43"/>nitas non potest esse pars.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e26673-d1e200">
<lb ed="Bd" n="44"/>Et sic patet solutio ad objecitiones
<lb ed="Bd" n="45"/>que procedunt, ac si compositio proprie
<lb ed="Bd" n="46"/>secundum naturam compositi
accipere<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="47"/>tur. Hanc autem compositionem quidam
<lb ed="Bd" n="48"/>vocant exegitivam, sicut diximus in
ex<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="49"/>positione precedentis opinionis.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>