-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-e52727.xml
202 lines (202 loc) · 10.2 KB
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-e52727.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 4</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 4</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bd" n="cod-al7b28">Paris 1894, v. 28</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bd" n="271"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-e52727"><!-- l3d15a4 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-e52727-Hd1e99">Articulus 4</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-e52727-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An secundum unam aliquam partem
simul inesse poterit acerbitas magni
doloris, et experimenium magne jJucun~
ditatis ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-e52727-d1e104">
<lb ed="Bd" n="80"/>ARTICULUS IV.
<lb ed="Bd" n="81"/>An secundum unam aliquam partem
si<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="82"/>mul inesse poterit acerbitas magni
do<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="83"/>loris, et experimenium magne jJucun~
<lb ed="Bd" n="84"/>ditatis ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e52727-d1e117">
<lb ed="Bd" n="85"/>Tertio quaeritur, Utrum secundum
<lb ed="Bd" n="86"/>unam aliquam partem simul inesse
pot<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="87"/>erit acerbitas magni doloris, et
experi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="88"/>mentum magne jucunditatis ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e52727-d1e128">
<lb ed="Bd" n="89"/>1. Videtur, quod non: quia
<pb ed="#Bd" n="272"/>
<cb ed="#Bd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="1"/>1. Contraria eidem secundum idem
si<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="2"/>mulinesse non possunt : maximus autem
<lb ed="Bd" n="3"/>dolor, et maxima delectatio
contrarian<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="4"/>tur: ergo simul inesse non possunt.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e52727-d1e147">
<lb ed="Bd" n="5"/>Si forte dicas, quod aliud fuit in
Chri<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="6"/>sto quam in aliis hominibus : quia
Chri<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="7"/>stus unitus fuit deitati: et ideo secundum
<lb ed="Bd" n="8"/>rationem sibi inesse potuit maxima
de<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="9"/>lectatio fruitionis, et secundum unionem
<lb ed="Bd" n="10"/>ad corpus maximus sensus doloris in
ea<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="11"/>den parte anime. Contra: Quidquid
<lb ed="Bd" n="12"/>informat indtvisibile, informat ipsum
to<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="13"/>tum: sicut si possibile esset albedinem
<lb ed="Bd" n="14"/>esse in puncto, non possemus dicere,
<lb ed="Bd" n="15"/>quod ipsum posset esse album
secun<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="16"/>dum quod est principium, et nigrum
<lb ed="Bd" n="17"/>secundum quod est finis: quia cum
al<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="18"/>bedo sit esse secundum naturam,
que<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="19"/>rit subjectum secundum naturam et non
<lb ed="Bd" n="20"/>secundum rationem. Principium autem
<lb ed="Bd" n="21"/>et finis non diversificant punctum, nisi
<lb ed="Bd" n="22"/>secundum rationem. Ergo similiter cum
<lb ed="Bd" n="23"/>anima non dividitur ita quod una pars
<lb ed="Bd" n="24"/>sil conjuncta, et alia pars non sit
con<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="25"/>juncta, per consideralionem
conjunctio<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="26"/>nis ad hoc et ad illud non est
diversifi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="27"/>cata nisi secundum rationem: sed dolor
<lb ed="Bd" n="28"/>et delectatio sunt passiones secundum
<lb ed="Bd" n="29"/>rely : ergo quacumque insit alicui
po<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="30"/>tentiae anime, informabit eam totam:
<lb ed="Bd" n="31"/>ergo altera non habebit locum nisi
po<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="32"/>nalur potentia illa substantialiter habere
<lb ed="Bd" n="33"/>partes diversas, quod absurdum esset :
<lb ed="Bd" n="34"/>ergo videtur, quod in eadem potentia
<lb ed="Bd" n="35"/>summus dolor cum summa delectatione
<lb ed="Bd" n="36"/>inesse non potuit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e52727-d1e219">
<lb ed="Bd" n="37"/>2. Item, Idem actus non potest intelligi
<lb ed="Bd" n="38"/>terminari ad duo ut terminos, nec in
ac<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="39"/>tibus anime, nec in actibus corporis :
<lb ed="Bd" n="40"/>quia jam unum efficeretur duo : sicut
li<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="41"/>hea una non potest terminari ad duo
<lb ed="Bd" n="42"/>puncta in parte una nisi efficeretur duae
<lb ed="Bd" n="43"/>linew Sed tristitia doloris et jucunditas
<lb ed="Bd" n="44"/>gaudii si simul inessent, inessent ut
ob<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="45"/>jecta circa quae esset actus ipsius : ergo
<lb ed="Bd" n="46"/>idem actus terminaretur ad duo, ut ad
<lb ed="Bd" n="47"/>terminos, quod etiam intelligi non
pot<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="48"/>est: ergo non insunt simul secundum
<lb ed="Bd" n="49"/>eamdem partem animae.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e52727-d1e250">
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="50"/>SED CONTRA :
<lb ed="Bd" n="51"/>Aut ratio Christi apprehendit dolorem
<lb ed="Bd" n="52"/>passionis aut non. Si non apprehendit :
<lb ed="Bd" n="53"/>ergo non ordinavit: ergo meritorius non
<lb ed="Bd" n="54"/>fuit, quod hereticum est dicere. Si
ap<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="55"/>prehendit: sed constat, quod etiam
dej<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="56"/>tatem sibi conjunctam apprehendit, quia
<lb ed="Bd" n="57"/>ab illius apprelensione numquam re.
<lb ed="Bd" n="58"/>tracta fuit: ergo in eadem potentia fuit
<lb ed="Bd" n="59"/>apprehensio duorum, unius ut summe
<lb ed="Bd" n="60"/>contraril, altcrius ut summe
convenien<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="61"/>tis. Constat autem, quod sequitur
expe<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="62"/>rimentuin doloris ex mortis
apprehen<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="63"/>sione, et summum gaudium ex
appre<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="64"/>hensione deitatis: et simul, ut videtur,
<lb ed="Bd" n="65"/>quia apprehensiones erant simul.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e52727-d1e289">
<lb ed="Bd" n="66"/>Solutio Sine prajudicio dici potest,
<lb ed="Bd" n="67"/>quod contraria inesse simul contingit
<lb ed="Bd" n="68"/>duobus modis, scilicet quod utrumque
<lb ed="Bd" n="69"/>insit ut forma et actus, et quod unum
<lb ed="Bd" n="70"/>sit ordinatuin in alterum ut maztcria,
<lb ed="Bd" n="71"/>et preecipue in potentiis anime hoc
con<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="72"/>tingit. Quod primo modo non possunt
<lb ed="Bd" n="73"/>inesse contraria, satis videntur probare
<lb ed="Bd" n="74"/>prius habite rationes. Secundo autem
<lb ed="Bd" n="75"/>modo et contraria possunt inesse, et
se<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="76"/>qui potest affectus : verbi gratia, in omni
<lb ed="Bd" n="77"/>penitente dolor est in ratione, quia
ali<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="78"/>ter non esset laudabilis : et tamen dicit
<lb ed="Bd" n="79"/>Augustinus : <quote xml:id="alalal-e52727-Qd1e321"> Semper doleat, et de dolore
<lb ed="Bd" n="80"/>gaudeat: </quote> ergo gaudium potest esse de
<lb ed="Bd" n="81"/>dolore, ita quod dolor sit materia
gau<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="82"/>dii, et ita ultrumque potest inesse. Ita
<lb ed="Bd" n="83"/>dico in Christo, quod mors fuit in
ra<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="84"/>tione apprehensa ut erat opus
redemp<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="85"/>tionis, et sic mors apprehendebatur ut
<lb ed="Bd" n="86"/>materia gaudiit: et ita utraque potest
<lb ed="Bd" n="87"/>inesse, et sic videtur logui Psalmus xvm,
<lb ed="Bd" n="88"/>6: Ficsultavit ut gigas ad currendam
<lb ed="Bd" n="89"/>viam. Et hoc modo poterat simul inesse
<lb ed="Bd" n="90"/>affectus doloris in judicio mortis, et
ju<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="91"/>cunditas ex fine mortis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e52727-d1e351">
<lb ed="Bd" n="92"/>Et per hoc patet solutio ad totum.
<lb ed="Bd" n="93"/>Vel, possemus dicere, quod dolor de
<lb ed="Bd" n="94"/>morte carnis non con!rariatur jucunditati
<lb ed="Bd" n="95"/>fruitionis aternce vel redemptionis
hu<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="96"/>mang: quia non sunt de eodem, et sic
<lb ed="Bd" n="97"/>possunt inesse simul. Sed haec solutio
<pb ed="#Bd" n="273"/>
<cb ed="#Bd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="1"/>non valet tantum quantum prima : quia
<lb ed="Bd" n="2"/>licet non contrarientur, tamen trahunt
<lb ed="Bd" n="3"/>per effectum ad contraria, sicut occupari .
<lb ed="Bd" n="4"/>circa inferiora vel superiora: et ideo
<lb ed="Bd" n="5"/>prior solutio est melior meo judicio, et
<lb ed="Bd" n="6"/>in hoc sensu procedit objectio facta in
<lb ed="Bd" n="7"/>contrarium
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>