-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-e77569.xml
354 lines (354 loc) · 17.9 KB
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-e77569.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 3</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 3</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bd" n="cod-al7b28">Paris 1894, v. 28</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bd" n="409"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-e77569"><!-- l3d23a3 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-e77569-Hd1e99">Articulus 3</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-e77569-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Utrum diffinitio fidei secundum
Dionysium et Magistrum Hugonem sit bene
assignata ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e104">
<pb ed="#Bd" n="409"/>
<cb ed="#Bd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="1"/>ARTICULUS III.
<lb ed="Bd" n="2"/>Utrum diffinitio fidei secundum
Diony<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="3"/>sium et Magistrum Hugonem sit bene
<lb ed="Bd" n="4"/>assignata ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e120">
<lb ed="Bd" n="5"/>Deinde quaeritur de hoc quod dicitur
<lb ed="Bd" n="6"/>in Litera, quod <quote xml:id="alalal-e77569-Qd1e126"> fides est virtus, qua
<lb ed="Bd" n="7"/>creduntur quie non videntur. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e132">
<lb ed="Bd" n="8"/>Inveniuntur alie diffinitiones juxta
<lb ed="Bd" n="9"/>istam sumpte : quae quia fere sunt
simi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="10"/>les, ideo duas ponemus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e142">
<lb ed="Bd" n="11"/>Dicit enim Dionysius in libro de
Divi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="12"/>nis nominibus, quod <quote xml:id="alalal-e77569-Qd1e148"> fides est unicum
<lb ed="Bd" n="13"/>credentium fundamentum eos collocans
<lb ed="Bd" n="14"/>veritati, et els veritatem in credibili
ve<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="15"/>ritate simplam veritatis scientiam
haben<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="16"/>tibus credulis !. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e160">
<lb ed="Bd" n="17"/>Hugo autem de sancto Victore sic :
<lb ed="Bd" n="18"/>
<quote xml:id="alalal-e77569-Qd1e166"> Fides est certitudo absentium infra
<lb ed="Bd" n="19"/>scientiam veritatis, et supra opinionem
<lb ed="Bd" n="20"/>constituta. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e174">
<lb ed="Bd" n="21"/>Aliae diffinitiones infra in secunda
par<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="22"/>te ponuntur,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e181">
<lb ed="Bd" n="23"/>1. Videtur autem non esse
fundamen<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="24"/>tum unicum : quia etiam humilitas
fun<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="25"/>dat. Si dicas, quod non fundat credentes
<lb ed="Bd" n="26"/>ut credentes, sed potius humiles : hoc
<lb ed="Bd" n="27"/>nihil est : quia jam secundum hoc
qua<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="28"/>libet virtus esset fundamentum, quia
cha<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="29"/>ritas fundat diligentem, et sic de aliis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e199">
<lb ed="Bd" n="30"/>2. Item, Hoc non videtur esse verum
<lb ed="Bd" n="31"/>quod dicit, Hos collocans veritati : quia
<lb ed="Bd" n="32"/>potius collocat in speculo, et in
enig<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="33"/>mate, quam in veritate.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e210">
<lb ed="Bd" n="34"/>3. Item, Infra scientiam veritatis est
<lb ed="Bd" n="35"/>fides : ergo non collocat veritati, hoc est,
<lb ed="Bd" n="36"/>in veritate : quia ita habet alia
transla<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="37"/>tho.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e222">
<lb ed="Bd" n="38"/>4. Item, Nec hoc verum videtur quod
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="39"/>dicit, Et eis veritatem, pro quo alia
trans<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="40"/>latio habet, <quote xml:id="alalal-e77569-Qd1e232"> et in ipsis veritatem </quote>. Si
di<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="41"/>cas, quod locat in nobis veritatem per
<lb ed="Bd" n="42"/>fidem : hoc nihil est : quia sic fides locat
<lb ed="Bd" n="43"/>per fidem, et idem operatur per seipsum :
<lb ed="Bd" n="44"/>et est principium operis, et medium vel
<lb ed="Bd" n="45"/>instrumentum : et hoc non potest esse.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e246">
<lb ed="Bd" n="46"/>5. Praeterea, Quid est dictum, per
<lb ed="Bd" n="47"/>fidem locari in nobis veritatem? quia
<lb ed="Bd" n="48"/>veritas est in specie, et non in fide, IT ad
<lb ed="Bd" n="49"/>Corinth. v, 7 : Per fidem ambulamus,
<lb ed="Bd" n="50"/>el non per speciem. Et ideo dum sumus
<lb ed="Bd" n="51"/>in corpore, peregrinamur a Domino,
<lb ed="Bd" n="52"/>sicut immediate ante dixerat Apostolus’®.
<lb ed="Bd" n="53"/>Ergo fides potius facit peregrinari a
ve<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="54"/>ritate, quam ponat eam in nobis, et
<lb ed="Bd" n="55"/>locet.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e270">
<lb ed="Bd" n="56"/>6. Item quaeritur ulterius, Quid est
<lb ed="Bd" n="57"/>quod dicit : In credibili veritate ? Si hoc
<lb ed="Bd" n="58"/>est in veritate credita, sicut innuit alia
<lb ed="Bd" n="59"/>translatio, quomodo verum est, quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="60"/>creduli, id est, fideles in veritate credita
<lb ed="Bd" n="61"/>habeant simplam scientiam veritatis,
<lb ed="Bd" n="62"/>cum tot sint articuli crediti secundum
<lb ed="Bd" n="63"/>utrumque symbolum ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e290">
<lb ed="Bd" n="64"/>Ulterius iterum quaeritur de alia
diffi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="65"/>nitione, quod fides est certitudo
absen<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="66"/>tium :
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e299">
<lb ed="Bd" n="67"/>1. Aut enim intelligit de absentibus
<lb ed="Bd" n="68"/>loco, aut de absentibus rationi. Si primo
<lb ed="Bd" n="69"/>modo : hoc nihil est : quia etiam
absen<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="70"/>tia loco possunt esse presentia rationi.
<lb ed="Bd" n="71"/>Si autem de absentibus rationi : hoc ad~
<lb ed="Bd" n="72"/>hue minus est : quia non potest esse
cer<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="73"/>tum rationi, quod non est prasens
ra<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="74"/>tioni.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e319">
<lb ed="Bd" n="75"/>2. Item quod dicit, Infra scientiam,
<lb ed="Bd" n="76"/>videtur in hoc deficere fides a certitudine
<lb ed="Bd" n="77"/>virtutis moralis, de qua dicit Philosophus,
<lb ed="Bd" n="78"/>quod virtus est omni arte certior : ergo
<lb ed="Bd" n="79"/>eliam certior est omni scientia. Si ergo
<lb ed="Bd" n="80"/>fides deficit a certitudine minus certi,
<lb ed="Bd" n="81"/>quam sit virtus moralis : sic videbitur
<lb ed="Bd" n="82"/>fides minus certa, quam virtus moralis,
<lb ed="Bd" n="83"/>quod. absit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e342">
<pb ed="#Bd" n="410"/>
<cb ed="#Bd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="1"/>3. Item, Quare dicit, Supra opinionem
<lb ed="Bd" n="2"/>constituta ? Est enim opinio habitus
cer<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="3"/>titudinis imperfect : quia formidat
con<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="4"/>trarium ex debilitate persuasionis : ergo
<lb ed="Bd" n="5"/>videtur, quod non sit habitus
comparabi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="6"/>lis fidei.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e362">
<lb ed="Bd" n="7"/>4. Ytem, Scire opinamur cum causam
<lb ed="Bd" n="8"/>cognoscimus primam, et quoniam illius
<lb ed="Bd" n="9"/>est causa, et quod impossibile est hoc
ali<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="10"/>ter se habere : numquid supra illam
scien<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="11"/>tiam est fides, vel infra? Videtur enim
<lb ed="Bd" n="12"/>quod supra: quia nos videmus, quod
cer<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="13"/>titudo fidei tam fortis est, quod antequam
<lb ed="Bd" n="14"/>negetur, eligitur a multis mors, sicut
<lb ed="Bd" n="15"/>fecerunt Martyres : sed hoc non fecerunt
<lb ed="Bd" n="16"/>Philosophi, qui multa vera sciverunt :
<lb ed="Bd" n="17"/>ergo debuit supra scientiam veritatis
di<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="18"/>cere constitutam, et non infra. Sep
con<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="19"/>tra : Fides probatur auctoritate, ut in
<lb ed="Bd" n="20"/>hac lectione dicitur. Et, ad Hebr. x1, 1
<lb ed="Bd" n="21"/>per totum, in Glossa. Locus autem ab
au<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="22"/>ctoritate debilis est, non faciens nisi
opi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="23"/>nionem : ergo videtur, quod fidei
certi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="24"/>tudo sit etiam infra opinionem
consti<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="25"/>tuta.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e406">
<lb ed="Bd" n="26"/>Solutio Dicendum, quod diffinitio
<lb ed="Bd" n="27"/>Augustini posita in Littera, etiam a
Ma<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="28"/>gistro disputatur in Litfera : et ideo
il<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="29"/>lam differimus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e417">
<lb ed="Bd" n="30"/>Ad primum autem dicimus, quod
diffi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="31"/>nilio Dionysii datur de fide secundum
<lb ed="Bd" n="32"/>proprium effectum, quem habet in
cre<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="33"/>dente : sic enim in eo quod ipsa est
pri<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="34"/>mum natura in edificio spirituali, fundat
<lb ed="Bd" n="35"/>et locat in veritate crediti sive articuli et
<lb ed="Bd" n="36"/>sperate beatitudinis : in eo autem quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="37"/>habet aliquid cognitionis, locat per
con<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="38"/>sensum certissimum veritatem crediti in
<lb ed="Bd" n="39"/>nobis : in hoc autem quod non est
veri<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="40"/>tas complexionis, sicut in proportione,
<lb ed="Bd" n="41"/>que dignitas vocatur, vel principium
<lb ed="Bd" n="42"/>syllogismi, ideo dicuntur in ipsa creduli
<lb ed="Bd" n="43"/>habere simplicem veritatis scientiam, id
<lb ed="Bd" n="44"/>est, simplum lumen, quod facit
aliquali<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="45"/>ter scire veritatem credibilis articuli. Et
<lb ed="Bd" n="46"/>sic patet, quod tria facit fides : scilicet
<lb ed="Bd" n="47"/>in eo quod est prima natura, fundat nos
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="48"/>in veritate : in eo autem quod est
cogni<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="49"/>tio quaedam certa, fundat veritatem in
<lb ed="Bd" n="50"/>nobis : in eo autem quod est simplex
<lb ed="Bd" n="51"/>lumen simile veritati prime, dat
simpli<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="52"/>cem scientiam veritatis credibilium.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e472">
<lb ed="Bd" n="53"/>Ad primum dicendum, quod humilitas
<lb ed="Bd" n="54"/>fundat, non ut jacta in fundamento, sed
<lb ed="Bd" n="55"/>potius ut faciens fossas profundas
eva<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="56"/>cuando se, in quibus fossis fundamenta
<lb ed="Bd" n="57"/>ponantur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e485">
<lb ed="Bd" n="58"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod veritatem
<lb ed="Bd" n="59"/>collocat in nobis in eo quod aliqualiter
<lb ed="Bd" n="60"/>tenet eam per cognitionis assensum, sed
<lb ed="Bd" n="61"/>non per speciem. Est enim veritas in
spe<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="62"/>culo et enigmate sicut objectum et finis,
<lb ed="Bd" n="63"/>licet non sit in ipsis sicut in propria
<lb ed="Bd" n="64"/>luce.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e504">
<lb ed="Bd" n="65"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod scientia
ve<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="66"/>ritatis dicitur ibi visio per speciem, et
ve<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="67"/>ritas liquida et aperta : sed non sumitur
<lb ed="Bd" n="68"/>hic ita, sed potius pro veritale quasi
ve<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="69"/>lata speculo et enigmate.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e517">
<lb ed="Bd" n="70"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod fides locat
<lb ed="Bd" n="71"/>in nobis veritatem per consensum et
co<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="72"/>gnitionem aliquam quam facit in nobis :
<lb ed="Bd" n="73"/>et bene concedo, quod non per fidem :
<lb ed="Bd" n="74"/>sed cognitio illa speculi est et
enigma<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="75"/>tis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e533">
<lb ed="Bd" n="76"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod veritas est
<lb ed="Bd" n="77"/>in utroque, sed differenter : sed in specie
<lb ed="Bd" n="78"/>non dicitur, eo quod ibi est impermixta
<lb ed="Bd" n="79"/>similitudinibus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e544">
<lb ed="Bd" n="80"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod leet multi
<lb ed="Bd" n="81"/>sint articuli, tamen unum subjicitur in
<lb ed="Bd" n="82"/>omnibus, quod est veritas prima : et ideo
<lb ed="Bd" n="83"/>dicitur fides simplex lumen, quod est
si<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="84"/>militudo illius veritatis, et non est
com<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="85"/>positum ex multis, sicut lumen scientiae
<lb ed="Bd" n="86"/>intellective.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e562">
<lb ed="Bd" n="87"/>Ad id quod objicitur de alia
diffinitio<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="88"/>ne, dicendum quod absentium dicitur ibi
<lb ed="Bd" n="89"/>quoad rationem : et hoc dupliciter. Est
<lb ed="Bd" n="90"/>enim absens rationi, id cujus cognitio
<lb ed="Bd" n="91"/>nullo modo est in ipsa: nec est ut ratio
<lb ed="Bd" n="92"/>probans, nec etiam ut objectum : et sic
<lb ed="Bd" n="93"/>absens rationi est ignoratum : et hoc
<lb ed="Bd" n="94"/>modo procedit ratio inducta. Secundo
<lb ed="Bd" n="95"/>modo dicitur absens rationi, quod qui-
<pb ed="#Bd" n="411"/>
<cb ed="#Bd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="1"/>dem inest ut objectum, sed non inest
ra<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="2"/>lio probans et convincens sensum : et
<lb ed="Bd" n="3"/>sic dicitur fides rectitudo absentium : et
<lb ed="Bd" n="4"/>ideo dicit Glossa, ad Galat. v, 6, quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="5"/>fides est certitudo invisibilium. Et
dicun<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="6"/>tur ibi invishilia, quae hic dicuntur
ab<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="7"/>sentia, scilicel quorun. ratio probans non
<lb ed="Bd" n="8"/>habetur : et tamen consensus fortissimus
<lb ed="Bd" n="9"/>est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e608">
<lb ed="Bd" n="10"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod virtus fidei
<lb ed="Bd" n="11"/>omni arte et omni virtute morali est
cer<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="12"/>lior : quia non intelligilur scientia
veri<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="13"/>tatis, scientia artis, sed potius
sontem<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="14"/>platio per speciem in verbo, quae omnem
<lb ed="Bd" n="15"/>certitudinem vincit per lumen quod
pro<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="16"/>cedit a verbo. Unde peccat illa objectio
<lb ed="Bd" n="17"/>eX aequivocatione scientiae veritatis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e629">
<lb ed="Bd" n="18"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod fides vincit
<lb ed="Bd" n="19"/>opinionem, de qua supra dictum est
<lb ed="Bd" n="20"/>quia dicit Augustinus, quod tria sunt qui-
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="21"/>bus juvatur intellectus in divinis,
scili<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="22"/>cet opinio, intellectus, et fides. Et quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="23"/>opinamur, debetur errori + quoniam
ne<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="24"/>scimus certum quid de illo pronuntiare,
<lb ed="Bd" n="25"/>scilicet utrum surgentes cum Domino
<lb ed="Bd" n="26"/>sint incinerati, an non. Quod autem
cre<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="27"/>dimus, debetur auctoritati, quae fulta est
<lb ed="Bd" n="28"/>revelatione Spiritus sancti :*et quod
in<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="29"/>telligimnus, hoc est rationis aperte : et
<lb ed="Bd" n="30"/>quoad hoc fides ponitur medium, ut
su<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="31"/>pra dictum est, et non aliter.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e664">
<lb ed="Bd" n="32"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod fides
manu<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="33"/>ducitur auctoritate patrum qui emerunt
<lb ed="Bd" n="34"/>eam : sed non conscntit propter hoc,
<lb ed="Bd" n="35"/>imo propter ipsam veritatem sine ratione
<lb ed="Bd" n="36"/>consentit. Et quoad hoc dicitur supra
<lb ed="Bd" n="37"/>consensum opinionis quee consentit
pro<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="38"/>pter rationem, timens tamen
contradi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="39"/>ctionem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-e77569-d1e684">
<lb ed="Bd" n="40"/>Et per hoc patet solutio ad totum.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>