-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-ee2863.xml
226 lines (226 loc) · 11.2 KB
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-ee2863.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 10</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 10</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bd" n="cod-al7b28">Paris 1894, v. 28</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bd" n="15"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-ee2863"><!-- l3d1a10 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-ee2863-Hd1e99">Articulus 10</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-ee2863-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An Pater, et Spiritus sanctus potuerunt
incarnari ? et, Utrum possunt
assumere eumdem hominem ? et, Utrum
possunt assumere plures homines ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e104">
<lb ed="Bd" n="7"/>ARTICULUS X.
<lb ed="Bd" n="8"/>An Pater, et Spiritus sanctus potuerunt
<lb ed="Bd" n="9"/>incarnari ? et, Utrum possunt
assume<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="10"/>re eumdem hominem ? et, Utrum
pos<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="11"/>sunt assumere plures homines ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e117">
<lb ed="Bd" n="12"/>Deinde quaeritur de hoc quod dicit
Ma<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="13"/>gister: <quote xml:id="alalal-ee2863-Qd1e123"> Si vero quaeritur, Utrum
Pa<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="14"/>ter, vel Spiritus sanctus, etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e129">
<lb ed="Bd" n="15"/>Ibi enim dicitur, quod Pater et
Spiri<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="16"/>tus sanctus potuerunt et possunt
incar<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="17"/>nari. Et videtur hoc esse falsum :
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e139">
<lb ed="Bd" n="18"/>1. Rationibus supra dictis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e144">
<lb ed="Bd" n="19"/>2. Item, Tanta est Dei potentia,
quan<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="20"/>taest ejus sapientia: et tanta est ejus
<lb ed="Bd" n="21"/>sapientia, quanta est ejus scientia: sed
<lb ed="Bd" n="22"/>numquam scivit Patrem incarnandum
es<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="23"/>se vel Spiritum sanctum : ergo numquam
<lb ed="Bd" n="24"/>potuit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e160">
<lb ed="Bd" n="25"/>3. Item, Nihil umquam potest vel
po<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="26"/>tuit fieri, cujus non precessit ratio in
<lb ed="Bd" n="27"/>mente divina: sed hujus numquam fuit
<lb ed="Bd" n="28"/>aliqua ratio: ergo numquam fieri
po<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="29"/>tuit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e173">
<lb ed="Bd" n="30"/>Utreriws quaeritur, Utram Pater et
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="31"/>Spiritus sanctus possent assumere
eum<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="32"/>dem hominem, sive humanam naturam
<lb ed="Bd" n="33"/>eumdem quam assumpsit Filius.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e186">
<lb ed="Bd" n="34"/>Et videtur, quod sic : Luce, 1, 37: Non
<lb ed="Bd" n="35"/>erit impossibile apud Deum omne
ver<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="36"/>bum: ergo assumere camdem naturam
<lb ed="Bd" n="37"/>potuerunt.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e197">
<lb ed="Bd" n="38"/>SED CONTRA:
<lb ed="Bd" n="39"/>Ponatur, quod assumpserint: unio
ta<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="40"/>lis est quae Deum facit hominem, et
ho<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="41"/>minem Deum in persona: ergo Pater est
<lb ed="Bd" n="42"/>hic homo, et Filius est hic homo, et
Spi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="43"/>ritus sanctus est hichomo : sed
quecum<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="44"/>que unict eidem sunt eadem, ipsa sunt
<lb ed="Bd" n="45"/>eadem: ergo Pater est Filius et
Spiri<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="46"/>tus sanctus, et e converso, quod falsum
<lb ed="Bd" n="47"/>est: ergo eumdem assumere non
potue<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="48"/>runt.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e224">
<lb ed="Bd" n="49"/>Uxrerivs iterum quaeritur, Si
potue<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="50"/>runt assumere plures, vel etiam omnem
<lb ed="Bd" n="51"/>hominem ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e233">
<lb ed="Bd" n="52"/>Et videtur quod sic: Tantum enim
be<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="53"/>neficium contulisset assumptio unius,
sic<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="54"/>ut alterius. Cum ergo Deus non sit
in<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="55"/>vidus, et communicabile fuerit hoc
bene<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="56"/>ficlum, videtur quod cuilibet homini
de<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="57"/>buit prestari.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e249">
<lb ed="Bd" n="58"/>Solutio Dicendum cum Magistro, et
<lb ed="Bd" n="59"/>Augustino, quod Pater et Spiritus sanctus
<lb ed="Bd" n="60"/>potuerunt et possunt incarnari: sed non
<pb ed="#Bd" n="16"/>
<cb ed="#Bd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="1"/>congruit, nec necesse fuit. Unde cum
<lb ed="Bd" n="2"/>Deus nihil nisi congraum faciat et
de<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="3"/>cens, ipse hoc non fecit: si tamen
face<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="4"/>ret et fecisset, congruentissimum esset.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e271">
<lb ed="Bd" n="5"/>Ad aliud autem quod primo objicitur,
<lb ed="Bd" n="6"/>dicendum, quod ante habite rationes sunt
<lb ed="Bd" n="7"/>rationes majoris congruentia# secundum
<lb ed="Bd" n="8"/>investigationem humanam: non autem
<lb ed="Bd" n="9"/>removent potestatem divinam, nec
limi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="10"/>tant in aliquo: quia Deus, ut dicit
Dio<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="11"/>nysius, est supra mentem, et supra
ra<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="12"/>lionem, ex quo neque digne cogitatur,
<lb ed="Bd" n="13"/>neque digne dicitur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e293">
<lb ed="Bd" n="14"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod tanta est
<lb ed="Bd" n="15"/>potentia, quanta est scientia ipsius,
se<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="16"/>cundum quod utrumque essentialter
<lb ed="Bd" n="17"/>consideratur in ipso. Sed si utrumque
<lb ed="Bd" n="18"/>referatur ad objecta extra, ipsa amphor
<lb ed="Bd" n="19"/>erit potentia quam scientia: quaedam
<lb ed="Bd" n="20"/>enim potest quae non seit, quia non
fa<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="21"/>ciet ea, id est, quorum rationem non
ha<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="22"/>bet apud se: quae si faceret, sine dubio
<lb ed="Bd" n="23"/>rationem eorum prehaberet. Et sic etiam
<lb ed="Bd" n="24"/>est de voluntate quae licet sit tanta,
<lb ed="Bd" n="25"/>quanta sit potentia et scientia, tamen
<lb ed="Bd" n="26"/>respectu objectorum minor est. Unde
di<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="27"/>cit Augustinus, quod quaedam
subjiciun<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="28"/>tur potenti et non scientiae, et quaedam
<lb ed="Bd" n="29"/>scientiae et non voluntati.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e330">
<lb ed="Bd" n="30"/>Aviv quod ulterius quaeritur, sine
pre<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="31"/>judicio dico ratione inducta non potuisse
<lb ed="Bd" n="32"/>fieri, quod Pater et Spiritus sanctus
eum<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="33"/>dem hominem assumpserint propter
con<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="34"/>fusionem in personis : quia cum unio sit
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="35"/>in persona, videretur sequi quod omnes
<lb ed="Bd" n="36"/>essent una persona. Dico autem non
pos<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="37"/>se fieri: quia licet Deus potuerit hoc
fa<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="38"/>cere, tamen ex parte nature assumptex
<lb ed="Bd" n="39"/>fieri non potuit, et hoc non est
impoten<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="40"/>tia divina, sed potius creature, propter
<lb ed="Bd" n="41"/>inconveniens quod sequi videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e362">
<lb ed="Bd" n="42"/>Ad aliud quod ulterius quaeritur,
<lb ed="Bd" n="43"/>Utrum omnem hominem assumere
po<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="44"/>tuerunt, supra responsum est quod hoc
<lb ed="Bd" n="45"/>iterum ex parte individuorum non esset
<lb ed="Bd" n="46"/>conveniens: quia omnes homines
uni<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="47"/>rentur in tres homines, ut probatum est
<lb ed="Bd" n="48"/>supra, et sic periret decor universi, et
<lb ed="Bd" n="49"/>potentia multiplicationis humani generis,
<lb ed="Bd" n="50"/>et ctiam (quod his inconvenientius est)
<lb ed="Bd" n="51"/>numerus electorum, et non fieret
restau<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="52"/>ratio ruine Angelorum. Si autem triam
<lb ed="Bd" n="53"/>hominum natura assumeretur, esset
su<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="54"/>perfluum: cum redemptio sit finis
as<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="55"/>sumptionis humane nature, et per unius
<lb ed="Bd" n="56"/>assumptionem possit fieri redemptio
infi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="57"/>nitorum mundorum si essent. Non autem
<lb ed="Bd" n="58"/>ideo dico superfluum, quia si fieret vel
<lb ed="Bd" n="59"/>factum esset, indecorum esset : imo
quid<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="60"/>quid facit Deus, decentissimum est: sed
<lb ed="Bd" n="61"/>assigno rationem convenientia ex parte
<lb ed="Bd" n="62"/>creatures. Decentissime enim Deus
dis<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="63"/>posuit nasum sub fronte: si autem sub
<lb ed="Bd" n="64"/>dorso posuisset, nihilominus
decentissi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="65"/>mum esset: licet non videamus decorem
<lb ed="Bd" n="66"/>ex parte dispositionis corporis humani.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee2863-d1e419">
<lb ed="Bd" n="67"/>Littera illius capituli per se patet.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>