-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-ee5296.xml
280 lines (280 loc) · 14.3 KB
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-ee5296.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 6</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 6</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bd" n="cod-al7b28">Paris 1894, v. 28</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bd" n="28"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-ee5296"><!-- l3d2a6 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-ee5296-Hd1e99">Articulus 6</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-ee5296-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An Christus tantum assumpsit quod
plantavit, ita quod de eodem numero
assumpsit ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e104">
<lb ed="Bd" n="3"/>ARTICULUS VI.
<lb ed="Bd" n="4"/>An Christus tantum assumpsit quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="5"/>plantavit, ita quod de eodem numero
<lb ed="Bd" n="6"/>assumpsit ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e115">
<lb ed="Bd" n="7"/>Sexto loco incidit dubium de hoc quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="8"/>dicit, ibi, A, in fine :<quote xml:id="alalal-ee5296-Qd1e121"> Omnia quae in
<lb ed="Bd" n="9"/>nostra natura plantavit Deus, Verbum
<lb ed="Bd" n="10"/>assumpsit, etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e129">
<lb ed="Bd" n="11"/>Hujus enim gratia queruntur tria
<lb ed="Bd" n="12"/>propter hereses excludendas. Unum
<lb ed="Bd" n="13"/>illorum est, si tantum assumpsit quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="14"/>plantavit, ita quod de eodem numero
<lb ed="Bd" n="15"/>assumpsit.
<lb ed="Bd" n="16"/>Secundo, Si non idem numero, sed
<lb ed="Bd" n="17"/>origine assuinpserit, ulrum tale quale
<lb ed="Bd" n="18"/>plantavit assumpsit ?
<lb ed="Bd" n="19"/>Tertio, Qualiter assumpsit ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e152">
<lb ed="Bd" n="20"/>Circa primum fuit heresis quaedam quae
<lb ed="Bd" n="21"/>dixit, quod substantia corporis Christi
<lb ed="Bd" n="22"/>per omnes partes ut lux quaedam
de<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="23"/>scendit, non commixta partibus nature
<lb ed="Bd" n="24"/>corrupt corruptione vitii, nec libidine
<lb ed="Bd" n="25"/>coitus infecta : et erroris sui
fulcimen<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="26"/>tum poterat habere, vel habebat
hujus<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="27"/>modi :
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e172">
<lb ed="Bd" n="28"/>1, Medicina et vulnus sunt diversarum
<lb ed="Bd" n="29"/>qualitalum : cum igitur substantia
Chri<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="30"/>sti medicina fuerit, cum vulnere non
de<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="31"/>bet esse ejusdem qualitatis : sed
vulne<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="32"/>ris fuit corruptio vilii : ergo qualitas
sub<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="33"/>stantiae Christi semper mansit sine
hu<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="34"/>jusmodi corruptione.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e190">
<lb ed="Bd" n="35"/>2. Item, Habetur in libro Sapientiae,
<lb ed="Bd" n="36"/>vu, 30: Sapientiam non vineit malitia.
<lb ed="Bd" n="37"/>Et ibidem, y. 25: Nihil inguinatum in
<lb ed="Bd" n="38"/>eam incurrié : cum igitur sapientia
Pa<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="39"/>tris Christus sit, videtur quod in sui
cor<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="40"/>poris substantiam numquam aliquid
in<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="41"/>quinatum incurrit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e208">
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="42"/>3. Item, Major puritas quae possit esse
<lb ed="Bd" n="43"/>sub Deo, Christo debetur : sed major
<lb ed="Bd" n="44"/>puritas est numquam substantiam
corpo<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="45"/>ris ejus peccato subjacuisse, quam
ali<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="46"/>quando etiain in alio subjacuisse : ergo
<lb ed="Bd" n="47"/>numquam subjacuit : ergo sicut lux
te<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="48"/>nebris impermixta per omnes descendit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e228">
<lb ed="Bd" n="49"/>4, Item, Augustinus dicit, quod aliter
<lb ed="Bd" n="50"/>fuit Christus in lumbis Abrahe, et aliter
<lb ed="Bd" n="51"/>Levi. Levi enim qui per concubitum
ven<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="52"/>turus erat inmatrem, fuit ibi per
concu<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="53"/>piscentiae legem, et per corpulentam
<lb ed="Bd" n="54"/>substantiam : Christus autem qui per
<lb ed="Bd" n="55"/>concubitum non erat venturus in
ma<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="56"/>trem, fut ibi per corpulentam
substan<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="57"/>liam tantum : ergo videtur, quod
simil<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="58"/>ter fuit in aliis: ergo haec corpulenta
<lb ed="Bd" n="59"/>substantia sine permixtione alterius
in<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="60"/>fects substantiw descendit : ergo
descen<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="61"/>dit ut lux.a primo parente.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e259">
<lb ed="Bd" n="62"/>5. Item, Primus homo non totus
cor<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="63"/>ruptus erat, aliter enim non fuisset
pos<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="64"/>sibilis ad medicinam : sed magis decuit
<lb ed="Bd" n="65"/>uta parte integra formaretur substantia
<lb ed="Bd" n="66"/>Christi, quam a corrupta: ergo Christi
<lb ed="Bd" n="67"/>substantia tota semper descendit integra,
<lb ed="Bd" n="68"/>corruptioni non permixta.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e278">
<lb ed="Bd" n="69"/>SED CONTRA:
<lb ed="Bd" n="70"/>1, Omnes partes primi hominis subjict
<lb ed="Bd" n="71"/>debebant rationi aequaliler nulla
excep<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="72"/>ta, et omnes vires mentis subjici
debe<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="73"/>bant Deo: ergo cum punitus sit in hoc
<lb ed="Bd" n="74"/>quod corpus sibi in hoc non
subjicieba<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="75"/>tur propter hoc quod ratio non
subjicie<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="76"/>batur Deo, in omnibus partibus corporis
<lb ed="Bd" n="77"/>debuit puniri, et totum corpus corrumpi :
<lb ed="Bd" n="78"/>ergo nulla pars mansit non corrupta.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e302">
<lb ed="Bd" n="79"/>2. Item, In generatione Seth non fut
<lb ed="Bd" n="80"/>nisi usus generationis actus: ergo
quid<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="81"/>quid substantiae Adae yenit in Seth, per
<lb ed="Bd" n="82"/>illum actum descendit: sed substantia
<lb ed="Bd" n="83"/>unde postea originaliler formatum est
<lb ed="Bd" n="84"/>corpus Christi, ab Adam venit in Seth :
<lb ed="Bd" n="85"/>ergo per illam actum descendit: ergo
<lb ed="Bd" n="86"/>per concubitum. Et quidquid descendit
<lb ed="Bd" n="87"/>per concubitum, lege concupiscentia est
<lb ed="Bd" n="88"/>corruptum, ut dicit Augustinus : ergo
<lb ed="Bd" n="89"/>substantia corporis Christi ibi existens,
<lb ed="Bd" n="90"/>non ut in Christo permixta, fuit corrupta.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e331">
<pb ed="#Bd" n="29"/>
<cb ed="#Bd" n="a"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="1"/>3. Item, In serie patrum aut fuit
simi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="2"/>litudo partium, aut dissimilitudo. Si
pri<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="3"/>mo modo, habeo propositum : quia cum
<lb ed="Bd" n="4"/>in serie eorum descenderit Christus,
sub<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="5"/>stantia corporis Christi non fuit
imper<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="6"/>mixta substantiae corporum aliorum. Si
<lb ed="Bd" n="7"/>autem fuit dissimilitudo in partibus,
dis<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="8"/>similis substantia dissimilis est actus
<lb ed="Bd" n="9"/>transfusionis, et dissimile est
receptacu<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="10"/>lum in quo servatur et custoditur : sed
<lb ed="Bd" n="11"/>hujusmodi actum diversum transfusionis,
<lb ed="Bd" n="12"/>et dissimile receptaculum impossibile est
<lb ed="Bd" n="13"/>invenire, etiam fingere volentibus : ergo
<lb ed="Bd" n="14"/>substantia corporis Christi a substantia
<lb ed="Bd" n="15"/>corporis aliorum non fuif distincta.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e370">
<lb ed="Bd" n="16"/>4. Praeterea, Secundum hoc Christus
<lb ed="Bd" n="17"/>non descendisset nisi ab Adam, et a
<lb ed="Bd" n="18"/>nullo aliorum, si haec substantia servata
<lb ed="Bd" n="19"/>distincta fuit in aliis tantum : quod est
<lb ed="Bd" n="20"/>contra Psalmum dicentem : <quote xml:id="alalal-ee5296-Qd1e383"> Ego hodie
<lb ed="Bd" n="21"/>genui te</quote>. Quod una Glossa exponit etiam
<lb ed="Bd" n="22"/>de nalivitale temporali.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e391">
<lb ed="Bd" n="23"/>Solutio Dicendum, quod substantia
<lb ed="Bd" n="24"/>corporis Christi non distincla transfusa
<lb ed="Bd" n="25"/>est usque ad substantiam corporis
glorio<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="26"/>se Virginis : quod etiam ideo in utero
<lb ed="Bd" n="27"/>sanclificatum est, et postea a Spiritu
<lb ed="Bd" n="28"/>sanclo purgatum : ut vilium
propagatio<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="29"/>nis omnino ab ipso deleretur, quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="30"/>Christus sibi sociare dignatus est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e411">
<lb ed="Bd" n="31"/>Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod
me<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="32"/>dicina fuit corpus assumptum ut
assump<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="33"/>tum, et hoc non in qualitate medicine,
<lb ed="Bd" n="34"/>sed secundum originalem materiam
tan<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="35"/>tum fuit in pluribus : et hoc sufticiebat.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e425">
<lb ed="Bd" n="36"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod nibil
inqui<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="37"/>nalum cucurrit in sapientiam umquam :
<lb ed="Bd" n="38"/>sed materia propaginis non habebat
re<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="39"/>lationem ad Christum nisi secundum
<lb ed="Bd" n="40"/>Materiam, et non secundum
corruptio<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="41"/>nem ab ipsa purgandam per
sanctifica<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="42"/>tionem in utero, et adventum Spiritus
<lb ed="Bd" n="43"/>Sancti : et ideo etiam incurrere non
po<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="44"/>tuit: sed tantum usque ad matrem cur
<lb ed="Bd" n="45"/>rebat : sed incurrere in Christum non
<lb ed="Bd" n="46"/>potuit.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e451">
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="47"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod Christo
de<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="48"/>betur major puritas quae sub Deo
intelli<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="49"/>gi possit, ila quod salvetur finis
redem<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="50"/>ptionis quae facta est per ipsum.
Impu<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="51"/>ritatem autem nullam facit, si de materia
<lb ed="Bd" n="52"/>in origine vitiata Christus puram
mate<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="53"/>riam sui corporis accepit. Ex hoc enim
<lb ed="Bd" n="54"/>Christus numquam peccato subjacuit :
<lb ed="Bd" n="55"/>licet ceteri cum quibus convenit in-
ma<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="56"/>teria, peccato subjacuerint.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e477">
<lb ed="Bd" n="57"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod Augustinus
<lb ed="Bd" n="58"/>accipit materiam quae est in lumbis non
<lb ed="Bd" n="59"/>absolute, sed cum comparatione ad eos
<lb ed="Bd" n="60"/>quorum est materia: et sic recipit
con<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="61"/>jungibilitatem cum libidine necessario
<lb ed="Bd" n="62"/>in quibusdam, et in quibusdam est
im<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="63"/>possibilis ad talem conjunctionem.
Mate<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="64"/>ria enim ut relata ad Christum non
pot<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="65"/>est subjacere legi concupiscentiae, ut
re<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="66"/>lata ad Levi non potest non subjacere.
<lb ed="Bd" n="67"/>Si autem absolute consideratur materia
<lb ed="Bd" n="68"/>lumborum, tota subjacet legi
concupi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="69"/>scentiae : et hoc modo Joquitur
Augusti<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="70"/>nus, sicut infra patebit, cum de
decima<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="71"/>tione Christi queretur,
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-ee5296-d1e512">
<lb ed="Bd" n="72"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod primus
ho<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="73"/>mo materialiter fuit totus corruptus :
<lb ed="Bd" n="74"/>unde medicina non fuit in ipso nisi
se<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="75"/>cundum potentiam tantum, scilicet quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="76"/>in assumptione poterat purificari : et ideo
<lb ed="Bd" n="77"/>illa objectio fundatur super frivolum.
<lb ed="Bd" n="78"/>Quod autem dicit, quod si totum
corru<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="79"/>plum fuit, tune fuit impossibile ad
cu<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="80"/>rationem, dicendum, quod hoc etiam
<lb ed="Bd" n="81"/>falsum est : quia non fuit ita corruptum,
<lb ed="Bd" n="82"/>quin corruptio separabilis esset ab ipso,
<lb ed="Bd" n="83"/>non sicut in demone a quo corruptio
<lb ed="Bd" n="84"/>separari non potest
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>