-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-f11214.xml
146 lines (146 loc) · 7.06 KB
/
cod-al7b28_alalal-f11214.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 4</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 4</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Bd" n="cod-al7b28">Paris 1894, v. 28</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Bd" n="573"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-f11214"><!-- l3d30a4 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-f11214-Hd1e99">Articulus 4</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-f11214-Hd1e101" type="question-title">An sit unus et idem motus erga amicum
et inimicum ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-f11214-d1e104">
<lb ed="Bd" n="24"/>ARTICULUS IV.
<lb ed="Bd" n="25"/>An sit unus et idem motus erga amicum
<lb ed="Bd" n="26"/>et inimicum ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-f11214-d1e113">
<lb ed="Bd" n="27"/>Deinde quaeritur de hoc quod dicit,
<lb ed="Bd" n="28"/>ibi, circa Initium : <quote xml:id="alalal-f11214-Qd1e119"> An unus et idem
<lb ed="Bd" n="29"/>molus stt erga amicum et inimicum,
<lb ed="Bd" n="30"/>etc. </quote>
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-f11214-d1e127">
<lb ed="Bd" n="31"/>Hoc enim videtur impossibile, quod sit
<lb ed="Bd" n="32"/>idem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-f11214-d1e135">
<lb ed="Bd" n="33"/>1. Impossibile enim est unum motum
<lb ed="Bd" n="34"/>comparari et terminari ad duos
termi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="35"/>nos ; sed duo termini sunt amicus et
<lb ed="Bd" n="36"/>inimicus : ergo simul non possunt esse
<lb ed="Bd" n="37"/>unus motus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-f11214-d1e148">
<lb ed="Bd" n="38"/>2. Item, Linea in una parte non
ter<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="39"/>minatur ad duo puncta : ergo nec motus
<lb ed="Bd" n="40"/>ad duos terminos. Si forte dicas, quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="41"/>unus est ut terminus, alter ut finis : hoc
<lb ed="Bd" n="42"/>ridiculum est: quia dilectio inimici non
<lb ed="Bd" n="43"/>refertur ad dilectionem amici, vel ad
<cb ed="#Bd" n="b"/>
<lb ed="Bd" n="44"/>ipsum amicum, ut ad finem, sed potius
<lb ed="Bd" n="45"/>ad Deum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-f11214-d1e170">
<lb ed="Bd" n="46"/>Solutio Dicendum mihi videtur, quod
<lb ed="Bd" n="47"/>falsum est istud. Sunt tamen alii qui in
<lb ed="Bd" n="48"/>contrarium objiciunt sic, quod sensibilis
<lb ed="Bd" n="49"/>minus est potens quam intellectualis :
<lb ed="Bd" n="50"/>sed sensibili plura simul accipimus, quia
<lb ed="Bd" n="51"/>visu unum, et auditu alterum : vel visu
<lb ed="Bd" n="52"/>duo quandoque ut duo, ut cum crutur
<lb ed="Bd" n="53"/>unus oculorum : ergo multo magis
in<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="54"/>tellectuali contingit hoc fieri : voluntas
<lb ed="Bd" n="55"/>autem partium intellectualium est. Item
<lb ed="Bd" n="56"/>dicunt, quod hoc quod dicit
Philoso<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="57"/>phus, <quote xml:id="alalal-f11214-Qd1e198"> Scire quidem multa possumus,
<lb ed="Bd" n="58"/>intelligere vero minime : </quote> non est
ve<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="59"/>rum, sed probabile : quia hoc etiam in
<lb ed="Bd" n="60"/>ista scientia probabile induxit
Phileso<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="61"/>phus pro exemplo : multa enim inducit
<lb ed="Bd" n="62"/>exempla in ilo libro quae non ad
liqui<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="63"/>dum sunt vera. Ego autem puto hoc esse
<lb ed="Bd" n="64"/>errorem. Non enim simile est pluribus
<lb ed="Bd" n="65"/>organis et pluribus potentiis accipere
<lb ed="Bd" n="66"/>plura, et una potentia componente ac si
<lb ed="Bd" n="67"/>per plura. Omnia enim haec bene
conce<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="68"/>do ad hoc quod est uno motu non
com<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="69"/>ponente, sed directe in objectum
ten<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="70"/>dente, accipere plura : non enim una vis
<lb ed="Bd" n="71"/>visiva secundum numerum est in
utra<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="72"/>que pupilla, sed in principio suo est una,
<lb ed="Bd" n="73"/>scilicet in conjunctione nervi optici ad
<lb ed="Bd" n="74"/>partem sensus communis. Similiter cum
<lb ed="Bd" n="75"/>dicitur, Video album Diarri filium, vel
<lb ed="Bd" n="76"/>album dulce, erit acceptio sensus
com<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="77"/>munis componentis et dividentis : et in
<lb ed="Bd" n="78"/>talibus non accipiuntur plura ut plura,
<lb ed="Bd" n="79"/>sed plura in uno subjecto quod est
mag<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="80"/>nitudo quae per se objectum est sensus
<lb ed="Bd" n="81"/>communis. Et idem est in intellectu
<lb ed="Bd" n="82"/>componente : quia in illo plura
acci<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="83"/>piuntur in actu compositionis uno. Sed
<lb ed="Bd" n="84"/>non est ita in intellectu simplici. Et ideo
<lb ed="Bd" n="85"/>dictum Aristotelis verissimum est. Dato
<lb ed="Bd" n="86"/>autem, quod hoc posset esse ex parte
<lb ed="Bd" n="87"/>apprehensive deintus, non deforis, non
<lb ed="Bd" n="88"/>dabimus adhuc, quod koc in affectu sit
<lb ed="Bd" n="89"/>qui nihil confert : sed potius intentiones
<lb ed="Bd" n="90"/>boni vel mali elicitas ex
ccmprehensi<lb break="no" ed="Bd" n="91"/>ne, ipse prosequitur vel fugit.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>