-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-al7b29_alalal-g53884.xml
366 lines (366 loc) · 19.3 KB
/
cod-al7b29_alalal-g53884.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Articulus 2</title>
<author ref="#Albert">Albertus Magnus</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Articulus 2</title>
<date when="2022-06-21">June 21, 2022</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="Be" n="cod-al7b29">Paris 1894, v. 29</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0"
url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2022-06-21" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#Be" n="268"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="alalal-g53884"><!-- l4d11a2 -->
<head xml:id="alalal-g53884-Hd1e99">Articulus 2</head>
<head xml:id="alalal-g53884-Hd1e101" type="question-title">Qualis est hujusmodi transmutatio vel
conversia ?</head>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e104">
<lb ed="#Be" n="62"/>ARTICULUS II.
<lb ed="#Be" n="63"/>Qualis est hujusmodi transmutatio vel
<lb ed="#Be" n="64"/>conversia ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e113">
<lb ed="#Be" n="65"/>Secundo queritur, Cujusmodi mutatio
<lb ed="#Be" n="66"/>vel converso sit ista quae est in
sacra<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="67"/>mento ?
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e122">
<lb ed="#Be" n="68"/>Videtur enim, quod non sit a tota sub- |
<lb ed="#Be" n="69"/>stantia.
<lb ed="#Be" n="70"/>1. Si enim sit mutatio a tota
substan<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="71"/>tia, non manebit postea actus illius
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="72"/>stantie’ proprius : ergo a destructione
<lb ed="#Be" n="73"/>concedentis, si maneat actus substantia
<lb ed="#Be" n="74"/>proprius, non est mutatioa tota
substan<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="75"/>tia : sed manet actus substantiae qui est |
<lb ed="#Be" n="76"/>reficere : ergo manet substantia vel
ali<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="77"/>quid substantiae : et sic non est mutatioa
<lb ed="#Be" n="78"/>tota substantia.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e149">
<lb ed="#Be" n="79"/>2. Item, Damascenus dicit, quod sicut
<lb ed="#Be" n="80"/>ex duplici sumus substantia, scilicet
ani<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="81"/>ma et carne : ita duplex est cibus:
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="82"/>stantiae enim panis conjunxit divinitatem
<lb ed="#Be" n="83"/>ut faceret nobis edulium : ergo videtur,
<lb ed="#Be" n="84"/>quod substantia panis manet.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e165">
<lb ed="#Be" n="85"/>3. Item, In aliis sacramentis sicut in
<lb ed="#Be" n="86"/>baptismo, confirmatione, etc., manet
<lb ed="#Be" n="87"/>substantia materia : ergo videtur, quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="88"/>etiam hic manere debeat : cum ergo
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="89"/>stantia panis sit materia, materia debet
<lb ed="#Be" n="90"/>ibi manere, et non est mutatio ab ipsa,
<lb ed="#Be" n="91"/>ut videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e183">
<pb ed="#Be" n="269"/>
<cb ed="#Be" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="1"/>4. Item, Fundamento non manente,
<lb ed="#Be" n="2"/>nihil eorum quae sunt superedificata,
<lb ed="#Be" n="3"/>manent : accidens autem edificatur
<lb ed="#Be" n="4"/>quoad esse super substantiam, sicut
su<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="5"/>per fundamentum : ergo substantia non
<lb ed="#Be" n="6"/>manente, nec accidens illius substantice
<lb ed="#Be" n="7"/>manet : sed manet accidens : ergo manet
<lb ed="#Be" n="8"/>substantia illius accidentis, ut videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e207">
<lb ed="#Be" n="9"/>5. Item, Communiter dicitur, quod
ac<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="10"/>cidentalis forma manet, ideo quia aliter
<lb ed="#Be" n="11"/>non duceret in rationem cibi : et hoc est
<lb ed="#Be" n="12"/>contra rationem sacramenti, de cujus
ra<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="13"/>tione est quod sit sensibile signum aliud
<lb ed="#Be" n="14"/>faciens venire in notiliam. Constat
au<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="15"/>tem, quod licet accidens. faciat ad
cogni<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="16"/>tionem ejus quod quid est, tamen
unum<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="17"/>quodque verius cognoscitur forma
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="18"/>stantiali, quam accidentali : ergo ratio et
<lb ed="#Be" n="19"/>cognitio cibi quae in sacramento
accipien<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="20"/>da est, verlus et melius accipitur per
for<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="21"/>mam substantialem, quam accidentalem :
<lb ed="#Be" n="22"/>ergo magis debet manere forma
substan<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="23"/>tialis, quam accidentalis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e242">
<lb ed="#Be" n="24"/>Item, Omne quod mutatur, est aliter
<lb ed="#Be" n="25"/>se habens quam prius : sed quod
causa<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="26"/>tur.a tota substantia, non habet se aliter
<lb ed="#Be" n="27"/>post mutationem, quia annihilatum est :
<lb ed="#Be" n="28"/>ergo non debet esse transmutatio a tota
<lb ed="#Be" n="29"/>substantia, ut videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e258">
<lb ed="#Be" n="30"/>6. Item, Non videtur esse
intelligi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="31"/>bile, quod aliquid mutetur a tota
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="32"/>stantia : quod enim mutatur,hoc aliter se
<lb ed="#Be" n="33"/>habet quam prius : quod autem aliter se
<lb ed="#Be" n="34"/>habet quam prius, aliud est nunc quam -
<lb ed="#Be" n="35"/>prius fuit: ergo oportet, quod maneat
<lb ed="#Be" n="36"/>aliquid ejus nunc ut prius: non igitur
<lb ed="#Be" n="37"/>est mulatio a tota substantia, ut videtur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e279">
<lb ed="#Be" n="38"/>7. Praeterea, Detur, quod mutetur
<lb ed="#Be" n="39"/>aliquid a tota substantia ipsius : ergo
<lb ed="#Be" n="40"/>nihil manet : nec enim forma, nec
ma<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="41"/>teria : cujus autein nihil manet, nihil
<lb ed="#Be" n="42"/>illius in aliquid convertitur : substantie
<lb ed="#Be" n="43"/>autem panis si mutatio est a tota sub-:
<lb ed="#Be" n="44"/>stantia, nihil manet: ergo nihil ejus
con<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="45"/>vertitur in aliud : ergo substantia panis
<lb ed="#Be" n="46"/>non convertitur in corpus Christi, quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="47"/>est contra omnes, quia nulla est hic
<lb ed="#Be" n="48"/>transsubstantiatio nisi panis et vini in
<lb ed="#Be" n="49"/>corpus Christi, ut videtur omnibus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e308">
<cb ed="#Be" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="50"/>8. Item, Aliud est hoc esse hoc, et
<lb ed="#Be" n="51"/>aliud est hoc transmutari in hoc, et aliud
<lb ed="#Be" n="52"/>est hoc esse post hoc. Cum igitur dicitur
<lb ed="#Be" n="53"/>panis transmutari in corpus Christi,
<lb ed="#Be" n="54"/>oportet quod secundum unum illorum
<lb ed="#Be" n="55"/>sensuum dicatur, scilicet quod panis sit
<lb ed="#Be" n="56"/>corpus Christi sine transmutatione, et
<lb ed="#Be" n="57"/>hoc est falsum : quia panis et corpus
<lb ed="#Be" n="58"/>Christi disparata sunt, et unum
remove<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="59"/>tur ab altero, ut homo et asinus. Aut
<lb ed="#Be" n="60"/>quod mutatur in illud : et cum omne
<lb ed="#Be" n="61"/>quod transmutatur, prius sit in fieri
<lb ed="#Be" n="62"/>quam in facto esse, oporteret quod
quan<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="63"/>doque panis fieret corpus Christi, quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="64"/>est falsum, quia sic corpus Christi esset
<lb ed="#Be" n="65"/>in potentia et in exitu de potentia ad ac~
<lb ed="#Be" n="66"/>tum, et inciperet esse de novo’: omne
<lb ed="#Be" n="67"/>enim quod exit de potentia ad actum,
<lb ed="#Be" n="68"/>est novum et generatum vel simpliciter
<lb ed="#Be" n="69"/>vel secundum aliquid sui. Et haec omnia
<lb ed="#Be" n="70"/>fides circa corpus Christi abhorret. Si
<lb ed="#Be" n="71"/>autem tertio modo dicatur, quod idem
<lb ed="#Be" n="72"/>sit transmutari in hoc quod est hoc esse
<lb ed="#Be" n="73"/>post illud. Contra : Non est intelligibile,
<lb ed="#Be" n="74"/>quod de pane post panem fiat corpus
<lb ed="#Be" n="75"/>Christi sine mutatione media : ergo
vide<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="76"/>tur, quod non sit ille sensus.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e371">
<lb ed="#Be" n="77"/>9. Praeterea, Sisic panis erit corpus
<lb ed="#Be" n="78"/>Christi, tune quandoque verum erit
di<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="79"/>cere, panis est corpus Christi : quidquid
<lb ed="#Be" n="80"/>enim erit in futuro verum, in aliquo
<lb ed="#Be" n="81"/>presenti verificabitur : numquam autem
<lb ed="#Be" n="82"/>verum erit dicere, panis est corpus
Chri<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="83"/>sti: ergo haec numquam fuit vera, panis
<lb ed="#Be" n="84"/>erit corpus Christi.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e391">
<lb ed="#Be" n="85"/>10. Praeterea, Cum dicitur, Hoc fit
<lb ed="#Be" n="86"/>hoc, quid supponit ly hoc? Si panem,
<lb ed="#Be" n="87"/>tunc panis erit corpus Christi, quod jam
<lb ed="#Be" n="88"/>improbatum est : si aliud, tune aliud
<lb ed="#Be" n="89"/>quam panis convertitur in corpus Christi,
<lb ed="#Be" n="90"/>quod falsum est.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e407">
<lb ed="#Be" n="91"/>Sorvutio. Dicendum sine prejudicio,
<lb ed="#Be" n="92"/>quod in materia ista et in materia de
<lb ed="#Be" n="93"/>Trinitate non sunt sufticientia verba quae
<lb ed="#Be" n="94"/>exprimant modum divine operationis :
<lb ed="#Be" n="95"/>sed balbutiendo in quantum possumus,
<lb ed="#Be" n="96"/>excelsa Dei resonamus : unde puto, quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="97"/>verius ista transmutatio vocatur transsub-
<pb ed="#Be" n="270"/>
<cb ed="#Be" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="1"/>stantiatio, sicut etiam quidam
antiquo<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="2"/>rum dixerunt : et modus ejus est quod
<lb ed="#Be" n="3"/>sit a tota substantia panis quoad
for<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="4"/>mam, et quoad materiam, ita scilicet,
<lb ed="#Be" n="5"/>quod de toto composito quoad
essentia<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="6"/>les partes nihil maneat.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e442">
<lb ed="#Be" n="7"/>Ad primum ergo dicendum, quod non
<lb ed="#Be" n="8"/>oportet, quod actus proprius substantie
<lb ed="#Be" n="9"/>non maneat; non manente substantia :
<lb ed="#Be" n="10"/>actus enim substantiae est mediantibus
<lb ed="#Be" n="11"/>viribus et potentiis : potenti aulem
<lb ed="#Be" n="12"/>sunt proprietates quae non sunt de esse
<lb ed="#Be" n="13"/>primo, sed secundo : et ideo in ista
<lb ed="#Be" n="14"/>transsubstantiatione manet actus cibandi
<lb ed="#Be" n="15"/>et reficiendi in potentiis, fundatus in his
<lb ed="#Be" n="16"/>que immediate consequuntur
composi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="17"/>tionem panis, quae sunt sapor, et
quan<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="18"/>titas, et hujusmodi : sed si illa non
ma<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="19"/>nerent, tunc verum esset, quod actus
<lb ed="#Be" n="20"/>proprius panis etiam non maneret.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e476">
<lb ed="#Be" n="21"/>Si autem objiciatur per auctoritatem
<lb ed="#Be" n="22"/>qua dicit Damascenus, quod destructa
<lb ed="#Be" n="23"/>substantia non manet ejus actus
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="24"/>prius, videtur dicendum quod ipse
intel<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="25"/>ligit de destructione in toto quoad
es<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="26"/>sentialia et potentias consequentes
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="27"/>stantiam : talis autem destructio non est
<lb ed="#Be" n="28"/>hic, et ideo mutatione facta a toto
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="29"/>stantiae, adhuc manet actus substantiae.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e498">
<lb ed="#Be" n="30"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod dictum
Da<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="31"/>masceni intelligitur quoad formas et
<lb ed="#Be" n="32"/>accidentia panis, quibus Deus
Domini<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="33"/>cum conjunxit corpus : ergo non quoad
<lb ed="#Be" n="34"/>substantiam panis manentem.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e511">
<lb ed="#Be" n="35"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod non est hic
<lb ed="#Be" n="36"/>simile et in aliis sacramentis : guia in
<lb ed="#Be" n="37"/>aliis sacramentis actus divinus non est
<lb ed="#Be" n="38"/>supra materiam, quae oculis subjicitur,
<lb ed="#Be" n="39"/>sed potius super animam_ suscipientis
<lb ed="#Be" n="40"/>sacramentum, et illam transmutat
alte<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="41"/>rando ad gratiam : in isto autem
sacra<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="42"/>mento propter rem contentam in
sacra<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="43"/>mento extra suscipientem, de qua dictum
<lb ed="#Be" n="44"/>est supra, actus divinus est supra
mate<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="45"/>riam qu oculis subjicitur in
sacramen<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="46"/>to. Et ideo illa transsubstantiatur.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e540">
<lb ed="#Be" n="47"/>Av atiup dicendum, quod substantia
<cb ed="#Be" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="48"/>fundat accidens quoad esse: sed duplex
<lb ed="#Be" n="49"/>est usus accidentis. Unus est in
mate<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="50"/>ria : et in hoc necesse est, quod fundetur
<lb ed="#Be" n="51"/>in substantia. Alter est ad opus divinum
<lb ed="#Be" n="52"/>ostendendum : et in hoc non est
neces<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="53"/>se quod fundetur in substantia, sed
suf<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="54"/>ficit sibi continentia virtutis divine
cu<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="55"/>jus opus demonstrat, ut signum ostendit
<lb ed="#Be" n="56"/>signatum : et sic est hic: unde non
opor<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="57"/>tet, quod subjecto sublato non maneat
<lb ed="#Be" n="58"/>accidens. De hoc tamen infra queretur
<lb ed="#Be" n="59"/>in sequenti distinctione capituli ultimi *.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e573">
<lb ed="#Be" n="60"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod forma
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="61"/>stantialis proprie est unius secundum esse,
<lb ed="#Be" n="62"/>et diversorum specie non est forma
<lb ed="#Be" n="63"/>substantialis una, et ideo non facit
inno<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="64"/>tescere nisi illud cujus est forma
pro<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="65"/>prie : et ideo si forma substantialis
ma<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="66"/>neret, duceret in panis substantiam, et
<lb ed="#Be" n="67"/>non in substantiam corporis Christi, et
<lb ed="#Be" n="68"/>sic esset occasio erroris. Sed de
acciden<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="69"/>tali forma non est sic: quia accidens est
<lb ed="#Be" n="70"/>proprium plurium, et potest ducere in
<lb ed="#Be" n="71"/>ipsum cujus ipsum est proprium,
preci<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="72"/>pue consignificando proprietates
diver<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="73"/>sas, sicut illa est, quod ex multis granis
<lb ed="#Be" n="74"/>colligitur panis, et corpus Christi verum
<lb ed="#Be" n="75"/>de multis guttis sanguinis et multis
mem<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="76"/>bris, mysticum autem de multis
fideli<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="77"/>bus, et sic de aliis qua in parte sua tacta
<lb ed="#Be" n="78"/>sunt. Et ideo accidens verius ducit in
<lb ed="#Be" n="79"/>rationem cibi, quam alterius modi ens,
<lb ed="#Be" n="80"/>sive fuerit forma accidentalis, sive forma
<lb ed="#Be" n="81"/>substantialis : et ideo manet ad usum
sa<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="82"/>cramenti.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e625">
<lb ed="#Be" n="83"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod hic dicitur
<lb ed="#Be" n="84"/>aliquid mutari, ita quod mutari sit idem
<lb ed="#Be" n="85"/>quod a tota substantia transsubstantiari,
<lb ed="#Be" n="86"/>et in tali mutatione non est necesse,
<lb ed="#Be" n="87"/>quod aliquid unum habeat se
diversi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="88"/>mode, sed tantum quod ipsum secundum
<lb ed="#Be" n="89"/>se totum convertatur in aliud totum:
<lb ed="#Be" n="90"/>sed ratio illa est de mutatione physica,
<lb ed="#Be" n="91"/>et tales plures solute sunt in pracedenti
<lb ed="#Be" n="92"/>articulo questionis.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e650">
<lb ed="#Be" n="93"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod medius
in<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="94"/>telleetus est hic, scilicet quod convertitur
<pb ed="#Be" n="271"/>
<cb ed="#Be" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#Be" n="1"/>in illud : sed non sequitur, qued sit in
<lb ed="#Be" n="2"/>potentia in illo : quia, sicut prius dictum.
<lb ed="#Be" n="3"/>est, ista transsubstantiatio non habet
<lb ed="#Be" n="4"/>fieri proprie dicta, nec habet ad hoc
sub<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="5"/>jectum commune utrique terminorum,
<lb ed="#Be" n="6"/>sed est simplex conversio totius in
to<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="7"/>tum.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e676">
<lb ed="#Be" n="8"/>Ad aliud dicendum, quod cum dicitur,
<lb ed="#Be" n="9"/>panis fit corpus Christi, in sensu in quo
<lb ed="#Be" n="10"/>ista recipitur, demonstratur substantia
<lb ed="#Be" n="11"/>panis quae oculis subjicitur sub
acciden<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="12"/>tibus sensibilibus ; et non sequitur id
<lb ed="#Be" n="13"/>quod ulterius infertur : quia fieri est hic
<lb ed="#Be" n="14"/>transsubstantiari a tota tubstantia.
</p>
<p xml:id="alalal-g53884-d1e694">
<lb ed="#Be" n="15"/>Et bene concedo, quod haec non est
<lb ed="#Be" n="16"/>vera, panis erit corpus Christi: et de
<lb ed="#Be" n="17"/>hoc infra est questio in hoc eodem
capi<lb break="no" ed="#Be" n="18"/>tulo : nec sequitur, quod aliquando sit
<lb ed="#Be" n="19"/>verum dicere, quod panis est corpus
<lb ed="#Be" n="20"/>Christi: ideo quia illud fieri dicitur a
<lb ed="#Be" n="21"/>tota substantia transmutari, et tunc nec
<lb ed="#Be" n="22"/>panis manet, nec aliquid de substantia
<lb ed="#Be" n="23"/>panis, gratia cujus verificetur ista, panis
<lb ed="#Be" n="24"/>est corpus Christi.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>